Join CruisersForum Today
Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Why are fill-timing coaches less desirable?
Old 10-04-2011, 07:37 AM   #1
H.Huester is offline
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 37
Have read numerous comments on the net indicating that coaches used for full-timing are less desirable than those just vacationed in. Some folks are even pretty adamant that they would NEVER own a coach that has been full-timed. Why is that?

More wear and tear on the coach/house systems?
More interior/exterior personalization?
Potential for more quick (possibly jerry-rigged) fixes?
A general funk from people living for a long time in such a small space?

Please share your thoughts.

Thanks
H.Huester

__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 10-04-2011, 08:35 AM   #2
BigV is offline
Senior Member
BigV's Avatar


Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lakebay, WA
Posts: 174
DW and I looked at a lot of coaches. Ones that had full time residents had a lot more wear and tear on them. Some things very visible like worn carpet, drawer sliders, worn locks, broken down furniture etc...

As far as jerry-rigged fixes we found the same no matter what. Some people just don't take pride in repairs.

We did wind up buying one that had been full timed. Main reason is we got it CHEAP and decided to go through it ourselves from end to end. Found a lot of factory installed problems and only a couple of bad repairs. We are into it for less money that if we had bought one that was not a FT and I feel have a better coach.

If you have the ability to work on them yourself you might consider them a bargain, if not you wont be happy.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-04-2011, 08:57 AM   #3
Dr4Film is offline
Senior Member
Dr4Film's Avatar


Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 1,194
Send a message via Skype™ to Dr4Film
I have owned my 2002 Windsor PBT since December 2003. Have lived in it full-time from the very first day I brought it home. Prior to that I lived in a 1992 Airstream Landyacht for one year.

The previous owners had used it to travel around the country to promote a new business called Creative Memories. I had no problem purchasing a coach which had been lived in for 1.5 years or more.

Whenever looking to purchase anything used, it is a matter of how well has it been maintained. However, to NOT buy a rig just because it had been lived in full-time is ridiculous.

I would much rather have a coach that had been used daily versus one that had sat in storage in extreme heat and cold situations with the systems not being used. Too many problems when they come out of storage. I've seen it too many times. I can always replace carpet, cabinet hardware, furniture, etc. However, it becomes very expensive to replace critical systems that have been abused by not using them. Such as the rooftop A/C's, Inverter/Converter, refrigerator, electrical, generator, engine, etc. Those are some pretty expensive repairs or replacements.

Dr4Film ----- Richard
__________________
2002 Monaco Windsor PBT 40Ft. (R HOME) - 26Ft. 2006 Pace Trailer (R JUNK).
Trailer Has 06 VUE (R TOWD) 04 Victory Alen Ness Edition (R RYDE) & Junk.
Full-Timer 9 Yr's & Still Lov'n It. Now in Anchorage Alaska for Two Months.
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-04-2011, 09:09 AM   #4
Twomed is offline
Senior Member
Twomed's Avatar
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: On the road
Posts: 382
Internet myth??? Have seen good and bad in week end and FT. I always depends on maint and care given by the owner. Worn items can be replaced easily. Abused items will end to be expensive "gotchas"! JMHO
__________________
Happy Trails
06 Dynasty Countess III
07 Hummer H3
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-04-2011, 09:34 AM   #5
RickO is offline
Community Moderator
RickO's Avatar


Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Litchfield Park, Arizona
Posts: 5,158
I agree that it seems to be a common belief that rigs used for FT have been somehow "worn out" and should be avoided... I even had John DeMartini of DeMartini Motors tell me that.

However, with a few years experience under my belt now I tend to disagree. I found that living in my coach made it easy and important to keep it maintained. When any little thing isn't working properly I have the time to fix it right away rather than put it off because we only have the weekend.

I suppose it can work either way but I sure wouldn't avoid rigs that had been used for FT.

Rick
__________________
Rick, Nancy, Peanut & Lola our Westie Dogs & Bailey the Sheltie.

2007 Itasca Ellipse 40FD
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-06-2011, 10:37 AM   #6
Gary RVRoamer is offline
Community Moderator
Gary RVRoamer's Avatar


Fleetwood Owners Club
Freightliner Owners Club
Florida Cooters Club
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Silver Springs, FL. USA
Posts: 9,581
I don't think it makes any difference, except for possible cosmetic wear and tear from more use. Fulltimers tend to take better care of their rigs, since they are using them day-in and day-out and depend on them 100%. But that doesn't mean all fulltimer rigs are well cared for, or that all weekender rigs are not.

To me, it would not make any difference in a buy decision - I would go on the physical evidence in front of me.
__________________
Gary Brinck
2004 American Tradition; 2007 GMC Acadia
Homebase in the Ocala Nat'l Forest near Ocala, FL
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-06-2011, 09:55 PM   #7
nbounder is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 306
There's another piece to this - Fleetwood tells you in the manual not to 'full time' in it. Why? because as we breath and move around, we perspire, even a teeny bit. This moisture is absorbed by the walls, ceiling, rugs, etc, and can make it easy pickins for bugs, etc to prosper and multiply. Mold will grow a lot better in dampish environments.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-06-2011, 10:04 PM   #8
BigV is offline
Senior Member
BigV's Avatar


Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lakebay, WA
Posts: 174
If that's the case they should never sell an RV in Washington.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-06-2011, 10:34 PM   #9
83Eagle is offline
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 78
After looking at a variety of Motor homes over the course of 3-4 years before we were given our current rig I can see the positives and negatives on both sides of the part-time used rig vs. the full-time used rig.

I inspected rigs in storage that I could not believe the damage to as well as rigs that were like new. Same went for the 4 rigs I looked at that were used full-time. 2 of them were beyond my ability to make what I consider usable, and 2 of them were nearly brand new.

Looking back I am really glad we waited until my wife's Grandparents were willing o part with their Mallard before investing in a motor home. I was happy that I knew where it was coming from, and that they had owned it since 1998. I also liked the record-keeping. It was not cool that it basically sat for 5 years (took that long of asking to buy it before they decided to part with it). Great thing was that it was primarily stored indoors when not in use ever since they owned it. That made an amazing difference when comparing it with others we had looked at.

Really it all depends on the owner and the level of care they took in the rig. Honestly our Mallard isn't without issues, but they are all cosmetic (curtains, etc...) or general maintenance items (for which I am learning more and more about). Love that I was able to find inexpensive indoor storage for it though. That is awesome.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-07-2011, 06:15 AM   #10
go6car is offline
Senior Member
go6car's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 199
In my opinion, a big part of that is the "funk" part. But this is not necessarily limited to full time rigs, or even to motorhomes. (I looked at a used popup years ago and it smelled like........people. As soon as you opened the door. I'm not sure how to actually describe this smell, but if you ever have the same experience you'll know exactly what I mean. ). I've also been in some full time units listed for sale that had no smell at all. Others, you could immediately tell had pets of some kind in there. It all depends.

Less interior carpeting and fabric furniture, etc. does help. With all things pre-owned, it's all about the care and maintenance of the individual rig (and all it's critical components). Things like carpeting, window treatents and furniture can be replaced, but it's an added expense (sometimes pretty significant) that you'd have to figure in to your individual budget.

Also might depend on how sensitive your individual nose is, too!
__________________
2008 Ford F150 FX4
2009 Outback Sydney 29 RLS
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-08-2011, 06:06 AM   #11
Tha_Rooster is offline
Senior Member
Tha_Rooster's Avatar


Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 989
I agree with the funk smell due to pets or just down right nasty. It doesn't matter FT or part time rving if they did not take care of it and clean they will look worn and smell. I have looked at a lot of units in my time and quit a few you could not make it past the door.
__________________
2007 Fleetwood Revolution LE 40V
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-08-2011, 06:14 AM   #12
JimM68 is online now
Senior Member
JimM68's Avatar


Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,391
"full time" doesn't mean moving all the time, either. All sorts of different full timers out their. I'm sure some have 2 rusted in place TT's, one in Arizona, one in NY, live in each 6 months and fly between them.

Full time doesn't always mean always on the move.
__________________
JimM

2008 Monaco Knight 40 SKQ | The "68"
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-08-2011, 06:35 AM   #13
tomwalt is offline
Senior Member
tomwalt's Avatar
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Tiffin Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 386
I don't think the FT vs. PT should be a factor. Look at how the owner maintained it (vs. polished it up to get rid of it).
Over the years I've seen very clean as well as funk units - from both FT and PT owners.
__________________
Tom and Amy from Northern Virginia.
2000 Allegro Chevy 454/Workhorse/TST/Crossfire
Life is a DIY project - enjoy it.
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-08-2011, 06:49 AM   #14
Ramblin is online now
Senior Member
Ramblin's Avatar


Workhorse Chassis Owner
National RV Owners Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Carolina Campers
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,022
I bought my coach (02 National Dolphin LX) from a couple who had full-timed in it for a few years, then had parked it for a few years. It was in great condition, and was well taken care of.

I'd not hesitate to buy a coach that had been full-timed. Every situation will be different, and shoud be evaluated individually.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best repair of gas fill hose leak? Kountry87Air MH-General Discussions & Problems 7 10-07-2010 01:36 PM
Sanitize tank without a fill? Wannabe Damon 5 10-01-2010 04:30 PM
Adding gravity fill to fresh water tank? jbobst National RV Owner's Forum 2 09-15-2010 07:31 PM
How to sanatize fresh tank if you don't have a gravity water fill (2010+ Models) gdbontly Excel Owner's Forum 11 09-14-2010 02:12 PM
Water Gravity Fill Problem MNGolfer MH-General Discussions & Problems 4 05-18-2006 10:27 AM

Download our Mobile App






1% for the Planet
» Upcoming Rallies
No events scheduled in
the next 365 days.
» iRV2 on facebook

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:52 PM.