|
|
04-24-2011, 06:11 AM
|
#29
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Oakton, Va
Posts: 1,160
|
I agree with Moxy. I have a 260HP ISB with a 5 speed Allison 1000 trans and it is well suited for my 36' MH weighing about 21,000lbs and a 3,500lb toad. Don't use the ISB for a lot more weight than that or you may wish for more HP and torque. I get 11MPG and that gets more important the more prices rise. My experience is that HP is matched to MHs and the MHs with more HP weigh more and the results are about the same. Reliability is about as high on my list as MPG and the ISB surely has that. There are so many built.
__________________
Jim Walker
N Virginia
2014 Palazzo 33.2
Cummins 6.7 ISB, Allison 2100 6 Speed
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
05-02-2011, 07:49 PM
|
#30
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ernieh
A good rule of thumb is nothing less than 20ft/lbs of torque per foot of coach. Anything less is going to be pretty slow going in the hills with a toad. 23 to 25 per foot will take you anywhere "with style".
|
Where did those numbers come from??
In my Journey 39F there was a Cat 350 (350 hp) engine - it sure was not underpowered - and using your formula 350 divided by 39 gives 8.97 Hp per foot
If I look Tiffin web site for the Allergo Bus I see 450 hp for a 43 foot unit or 10.43 HP per foot
PHESPE
|
|
|
05-02-2011, 11:38 PM
|
#31
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,979
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHESPE
Where did those numbers come from??
In my Journey 39F there was a Cat 350 (350 hp) engine - it sure was not underpowered - and using your formula 350 divided by 39 gives 8.97 Hp per foot
If I look Tiffin web site for the Allergo Bus I see 450 hp for a 43 foot unit or 10.43 HP per foot
PHESPE
|
I made no mention of horsepower because it means nothing as far a work is concerned. Torque is what moves you and your coach probably has over 800 ft. lbs.
__________________
ernieh
2019 Phaeton 37BH
|
|
|
05-03-2011, 05:41 PM
|
#33
|
Moderator Emeritus
Nor'easters Club Workhorse Chassis Owner iRV2 No Limits Club
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 30,785
|
Just had a friend have his Transmission Control Unit go on Bounder 2001 Cummins engine and cost him $3100 big ones, without a, at least, 30 day warranty, DP's can be expensive.
Tried to have him get a rebuilt or look elsewhere but he didn't want to go that route.
|
|
|
05-03-2011, 05:52 PM
|
#34
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fall City, WA
Posts: 531
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHESPE
Really not true - but rather than get into a war of words may I suggest you do a little research on the subject.
PHESPE
|
Phespe;
Erine's rule uses TORQUE. You twisted it to horsepower. They are not the same. Use the correct factor, and you'll probably get a better result.
__________________
2012 Montana 3582RL
|
|
|
05-03-2011, 06:03 PM
|
#35
|
Senior Member
Fleetwood Owners Club
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,031
|
Quote:
Just had a friend have his TCU go
|
A google sears of TCU only came up with Texas Christian University
Nothing on a Cummins search either. Other then a ECU
__________________
99 Discovery 34Q ISB
2014 MKS AWD EcoBoost Toad
Fulltime Since "99"
|
|
|
05-03-2011, 06:23 PM
|
#36
|
Moderator Emeritus
Nor'easters Club Workhorse Chassis Owner iRV2 No Limits Club
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 30,785
|
Check edit.
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 03:58 PM
|
#37
|
Junior Member
Freightliner Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 27
|
Re Cummins 300HP ISB Engine
We have a Model 36G Itasca Meridian GVWR: 27,910 Lbs
Freightliner XC-S chassis - Cummins 300HP Engine Marketing Model Name: ISB-300
Service Model Name: ISB850 Eng. Config. # D403061BV04
Built: 11 OCT 2005
We purchased it as a pre-owned vehicle last October and have been completely satisfied with the performance. We are on the coast in So. Calif and have made the trip to Idyllwild, CA at 6,300' and over the Cajon Pass with no problems at all.
We just acquired our "toad", a Honda CR-V and have yet to take any trips since we got our Blue Ox installed but on flat ground with the CR-V being towed, you can't tell it's there unless you look at the tow monitor.
Personally, IMHO, those folks complaining about the engine being underpowered must expect Ferrari performance from a workhorse.
__________________
Wayne (KQ6WG), Bonnie & Sofie (Rottweiler) - '06 Itasca Meridian 36G -Cummins 300HP/Allison 2000 SBW - Onan 7.5KW - '08 Honda CRV (toad) - M&G proportional brake system Last RV - Hans Christian 38T Cutter Rigged Sailboat - Homebase - Fullerton, CA
|
|
|
05-05-2011, 03:21 PM
|
#38
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 778
|
There has never, ever been one recorded case of an ISB having cylinder wall cavitation pitting. ISC and ISL cannot say the same thing. ISB 5.9 and present 6.7 engines do not require the use of a heavy duty antifreeze with chemical additives to protect against cavitation pitting of the cylinder wall. In case you do not know what that is, it is a perforation of the cylinder wall by violent implosions of vacuum bubbles against the cylinder wall. Coolant eventually enters the oil. A VERY expensive repair in an ISC or ISL.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|