Join CruisersForum Today
Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Is a Cummins ISB a bad way to go ?
Old 03-17-2011, 04:40 PM   #1
michguy is offline
Senior Member
michguy's Avatar
National RV Owners Club
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Spring Lake, Michigan
Posts: 133
I desperately need your advice. I have received so many conflicting responses to questions re: the Cummins ISB engines that I don't know how to proceed. We are going to buy a 36 ft. - 40 ft. used Diesel Pusher. I see so many of these with Cummins 300 HP Diesel engines. I've been assuming that all of these are the ISB engines, and that I shouldn't buy a coach with this engine. My question is, "Why not?" Is the engine overtaxed ? Is it more apt to break down ? If I pull a 2007 Saturn Aura, am I asking too much from it. I do intend to travel in the Rockies, the Adirondacks, the Alleghenies, Blue Ridge, Wasatch and various California ranges as well. But, that will not be my exclusive use. I'm aware that I won't climb the mountains with the same gusto as those with a 400 L model, but that doesn't concern me. What does, is if the engine is subject to more major repairs and problems than the ISC's & ISL's. Please, somebody give me some answers. I'm passing up some fine coaches due to this situation.
Thank you,
Michguy

__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 03-17-2011, 05:18 PM   #2
RustyJC is offline
Moderator Emeritus
RustyJC's Avatar


Texas Boomers Club
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cypress, Texas USA
Posts: 6,626
Where exactly are you getting your information regarding the reliability of the Cummins ISB engines? In the size coach you're considering, some might consider them underpowered, but much of that depends on your expectations. The 5.9 liter and later 6.7 liter Cummins B-series engine has a long history dating back to the early 1980s. They've been used in both on-road and off-road applications powering not only motorhomes but agricultural equipment, military applications, generator and pump sets, school buses medium duty trucks and much more. Unless an engine has been modified with aftermarket components for more power, Cummins' factory calibrations are designed to keep the engine out of trouble, even if you climb the Rockies with the accelerator pedal on the floor.

If you'll cite the particular problems you're hearing about, we'll be glad to address them.

Rusty

__________________
2011 Dodge Ram 3500 Laramie Cummins 6.7L/6 speed auto/4.10LS crew cab LB dually
2004 Doubletree Mobile Suites 36RE3 5th wheel
Come join us on a TEXAS BOOMERS rally!
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-17-2011, 05:20 PM   #3
Automobilist is offline
Senior Member
Automobilist's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 92024
Posts: 391
Our previous diesel pusher was a 2001 35' Forest River with the ISB / 5 speed Allison. Way, way, WAY underpowered. 260hp & 520 lb ft torque. Not nearly enough to push 22k of coach. The basic motor is fine, works great in Dodge pickups. Torque is where its at in motorhomes, and the ISB doesn't cut it. Our current coach has a Cat 7.2L, with 860 lb ft of torque. Realistically, I wouldn't tow much of anything with an ISB.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-17-2011, 06:29 PM   #4
fun time is offline
Senior Member


Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oh.
Posts: 417
I have owned two and currently have a 36ft. Meridian with the 300hp. Never had a problem, great fuel milage. Enough said. You have to make the decision and no one can make it for you.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-17-2011, 06:32 PM   #5
srydve is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 218
I have a 34' Kountry Star with a 300 hp ISB, I pull an extended cab Ranger pick up. I have no complaints with any aspect of the ISB. Sure you could have a unit with a bigger motor and more power and torque, if you're the type that hates anyone going by you in the passing lane then you won't be happy with the ISB. If on the other hand you can be satisfied with getting there in reasonable fashion I don't believe there's any reason to avoid one.
__________________
Dave
2004 Newmar KSDP 3353
Surrey B.C.
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-17-2011, 06:34 PM   #6
hooverbill is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 311
[QUOTE=Automobilist;811635]Our previous diesel pusher was a 2001 35' Forest River with the ISB / 5 speed Allison. Way, way, WAY underpowered. 260hp & 520 lb ft torque. Not nearly enough to push 22k of coach. QUOTE]

Agree. That's not enough for a pick up much less a MH. I had a Chevy with the Duramax that had 100 more HP and 130 more ft/lbs of torque. I don't know, but maybe the ISB is considerably cheaper than an ISC or ISL.
__________________
2009 AC Allegiance 40X
Spartan Chassis
Cummins ISL
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-17-2011, 06:44 PM   #7
RustyJC is offline
Moderator Emeritus
RustyJC's Avatar


Texas Boomers Club
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cypress, Texas USA
Posts: 6,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by michguy View Post
I'm aware that I won't climb the mountains with the same gusto as those with a 400 L model, but that doesn't concern me. What does, is if the engine is subject to more major repairs and problems than the ISC's & ISL's.
To address your specific question as you stated above, no, it's not.

Rusty
__________________
2011 Dodge Ram 3500 Laramie Cummins 6.7L/6 speed auto/4.10LS crew cab LB dually
2004 Doubletree Mobile Suites 36RE3 5th wheel
Come join us on a TEXAS BOOMERS rally!
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-17-2011, 08:25 PM   #8
JManatee is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North East, CT (Tolland County)
Posts: 126
We have the ISB 325hp in an 38' (33k gcwr) and tow a honda CRV, we have towed all over the north east. Including the white mountain area... Its not a race car, but I am often passing trucks on hills.

We average just under 10mpg. I am happy with my ISB
__________________
2008 Monaco Cayman XL 38PBD
Twenty years from now you'll be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by things you did. Explore, Dream, Discover. Mark Twain
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-17-2011, 08:54 PM   #9
gknott is offline
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rocky Mtn House, Alberta
Posts: 44
We had a 98' 36' discovery w/ ISB 275hp and 660 torque and 6sd trans. Pulled Jeep Grande Cherokees
Had lots of power,not many hills it wouldn't pull in 4th at 1800 to 2000 RPM.(25000#GCVW).Good fuel economy
__________________
2010 tuscany 4051 425 ISL
2010 Buick Enclave Dianne, Gerald & Sam the cat.
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-18-2011, 09:05 AM   #10
Parkerrs is offline
Senior Member
Parkerrs's Avatar
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dallas, Ga.
Posts: 224
Good fuel economy = Yes
Will "do" the job = Yes

More problems or repairs = No
More costly repairs = No
Major trouble = no

The C and L series have much more torque and pull like a bull. They also give worse fuel economy which is the trade off for the power. The B is a fine engine, but until you drive similar length and wieght coaches with each engine you can't make an informed decision.

Drive similar coaches with each engine and then decide for yourself what you can live with. I've been told the units with the B get around 10mpg, I know from experience the L will get in the 7-7.8mpg range and I haven't talked with anyone running a C.

All three are good engines and will do the job for the life of the coach when properly maintained.
__________________
Tommy Parker
2007 Newmar Kountry Star 3914, ISL400
2001 Jeep Cherokee toad, M&G brake/2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-18-2011, 09:47 AM   #11
ernieh is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 514
A good rule of thumb is nothing less than 20ft/lbs of torque per foot of coach. Anything less is going to be pretty slow going in the hills with a toad. 23 to 25 per foot will take you anywhere "with style".
__________________
ernieh
2003 Journey DL, 2007 Wrangler Toad
Coming soon, 2012 Phaeton 36QSH
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-18-2011, 10:40 AM   #12
southland is offline
Member
southland's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: south west tn.
Posts: 76
I have a 300 ISB in a 35 ft unit. No problems other than fuel (my Fault).
No oil burned during a 10k mile trip.
Did wish for another 50 or so horses while in the mountains but got there just the same.
Fuel mileage is good for a MH.
Good luck with your choice.
Jerry
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-18-2011, 12:15 PM   #13
Dacotah is offline
Senior Member
Dacotah's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 138
Before we bought our 2001 38' Sportscoach, we did some engine research and like most of the comments here, it depends on who you ask. We have the 275 HP ISB and it is very economical; without towing we get 11.2 MPG at 64 mph, but we live in Florida without any hillls. I expect the mountains will be very slow, but on the flat land it has enough power for us. We havew owned many gas coaches over a 20 year span but this is our first diesel. My research showed that the ISB is very reliable, easy to work on and parts are inexpensive. Also, Cummins has great support for do it yourselfers like myself, and I joined the Cummins power club which gives 10% off on parts and labor. An older coach like mine with only one slide out does not weigh as much as the new four slide ones either. DACOTAH
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 03-18-2011, 03:48 PM   #14
michguy is offline
Senior Member
michguy's Avatar
National RV Owners Club
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Spring Lake, Michigan
Posts: 133
Thank you everybody. I'm certainly not afraid of the 300 HP ISB's anymore. It would be nice to have power to burn, but the increase in fuel economy means that I'll have more money to burn.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cummins Engine getting dirt in it lrodsangel Cummins Engines 27 05-23-2011 11:41 PM
Kudos to Coach-net, Cummins NW & Spartan Chassis Customer Service Spikester Class A Motorhome Discussions 2 11-11-2010 08:18 PM
Cummins steps up JFC Monaco Owner's Forum 1 12-25-2009 08:56 AM
2008 Cummins ISB 6.7L Garbageman Winnebago Industries Owner's Forum 4 11-14-2007 05:19 AM
Cummins unveils '07 engine lineup Tom N Class A Motorhome Discussions 8 03-01-2006 04:10 PM

Download our Mobile App






1% for the Planet
» Upcoming Rallies
No events scheduled in
the next 365 days.
» iRV2 on facebook

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 AM.