Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > POWER TRAIN GARAGE FORUMS > Caterpillar Engine Forum
Click Here to Login
Register FilesVendors Registry Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-25-2013, 05:32 AM   #57
def
Senior Member
 
def's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: The heart of Dixie..Roll Tide!
Posts: 151
Send a message via Yahoo to def
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbo2013 View Post
Oil is unknown, just bought this coach, dealer said it was recently changed, the filters are new looking and the oil looks clean on the dip stick.

I change it anyway soon.
You say the oil looks clean.....

Isn't the oil black with the typical diesel engine soot?

My 3126 soots the oil rather soon after an oil change and it changes to black. I use Mobil Delvac 1300 15w-40 year round. My engine has never required the oil to be topped up and the engine is clean on the outside (no oil leaks).
__________________
2000 HR Endeavor, 3126 CAT, Freightliner, "The Highway Hilton" pulling a BMW.
def is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-25-2013, 05:35 AM   #58
def
Senior Member
 
def's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: The heart of Dixie..Roll Tide!
Posts: 151
Send a message via Yahoo to def
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRE UP View Post
Well,
10.8 is without a doubt, outstanding. Mine couldn't get 10.8 sitting in its parking place right here at home.
Scott
Same here Fire Up.

BTW, last time I fueled was in Ohio. I paid less than $3.00/gallon.

Merry Christmas

__________________
2000 HR Endeavor, 3126 CAT, Freightliner, "The Highway Hilton" pulling a BMW.
def is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 06:11 AM   #59
Senior Member
 
jimbo2013's Avatar
 
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRE UP View Post
I'm simply stating the fact that my coach/engine is considerably louder with the Aero installed than it was prior.
Scott, your install looks good, just odd the way they made the pipes go across the whole coach and exit the opposite side of the exhaust manifold that will not be as efficient perhaps.

I wonder if that may contribute to lack of poorer mpg than it could be, but I'm no expert, just a guess.



I guess where we disagree is yours is considerably louder than stock mine is not (considerably)

And "hes4all" agrees on that point

Quote:
Originally Posted by def View Post
You say the oil looks clean.....

Isn't the oil black with the typical diesel engine soot?.
I know exactly what you mean, my last diesel was like that, this oil is not yet that black......

Quote:
Originally Posted by hes4all View Post
I have the Aero XL on my ISL 400 and it is louder than stock. I knew it would be by just looking at it. But it is not that loud to where it bothers me and my buddy who RV's with me says he can't hear it when he follows me in his coach.
If it helps with MPG then it was worth it in my opinion?
Agree

Merry Christmas guys
__________________
Newmar Ventana 3933 | Miata close behind
1,060 Watts of Solar | 8 T-105 RE Batteries | Outback controls
HR 38 Endeavor
jimbo2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 06:57 AM   #60
Senior Member
 
Iwillbeit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Brooksville FL
Posts: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAT2000 View Post
Ill take the Cat sounding like its suppose too and better mileage, you want quiet get a gas job! Lol beside at near idle they all sound the same diesel that is! More power!!! Ho ho ho!
No.. I don't want a gas job, I just want a quiet diesel motor. More power is easily achieved by buying a bigger motor to began with. Never understood buying a 4 cylinder and then spending money on all the gadget items trying to make it run with a V8. I guess we all have our different beliefs and ways. You go to your church, and I'll go to mine.
Iwillbeit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 07:14 AM   #61
Senior Member
 
CAT2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iwillbeit View Post

No.. I don't want a gas job, I just want a quiet diesel motor. More power is easily achieved by buying a bigger motor to began with. Never understood buying a 4 cylinder and then spending money on all the gadget items trying to make it run with a V8. I guess we all have our different beliefs and ways. You go to your church, and I'll go to mine.
I'm not sure replacing a muffler is spending money on gadget items, it needs one.

Merry Christmas!
CAT2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 10:48 AM   #62
Senior Member
 
Foretravel Owners Club
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 511
From the sound of the replies, seems the only solution is to install two restrictive mufflers, that would help some engines.
Dave M
__________________
Foretravel, 2001, 36' ISM500 "Hot Rod"
F150 w/EZ Golf Cart or
CanAM 800 Max Limited ATV
Genset is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 10:58 AM   #63
Senior Member
 
palehorse89's Avatar
 
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,310
Made me laugh out loud!

Maybe the answer lyes in post #49 here http://www.irv2.com/forums/f123/2000...-185763-4.html
__________________
2012 Essex 4544 2011 Jeep JK, M&G Braking, 2014 MTI 27' Hog Hauler, Wireless brake control, 2006 Ultra & 1989 Springer, 2003 Harley-Davidson
FLHR Road King Anniversary
palehorse89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 04:47 PM   #64
Senior Member
 
FIRE UP's Avatar


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Out there, somewhere
Posts: 9,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iwillbeit View Post
No.. I don't want a gas job, I just want a quiet diesel motor. More power is easily achieved by buying a bigger motor to began with. Never understood buying a 4 cylinder and then spending money on all the gadget items trying to make it run with a V8. I guess we all have our different beliefs and ways. You go to your church, and I'll go to mine.
Iwillbeit,
I pretty much agree with you Sir. I don't know who's involved in specking out motor homes, chassis specs, and the like but, I too would give a lot for a larger motor, IN OUR SAME COACH!!!! In that 27,000 lb. (curb weight) coach, the CAT C-7 330 HP engine is fine for FLAT GROUND and, even towing our 5300 lb. (curb weight) GMC Sierra Extended cab 4x4, but, when it even SEES a grade, it starts slowing down.

Of all the research I've done, I've only found that Country Coach, Travel Supreme and, Alpine have made what I call smaller coaches, with larger engines. I've seen all three brands, in a 34' with 400 and 450 HP engines. The rest of the manufacturers always under power their coaches, in my opinion. I mean, I've seen 39' and 40' coaches with 330 HP engines. Geeze, talk about under powered. But, trying to squeeze a few more here, a tad there out of an engine that's close to it's peak in HP and torque output already, I'm not sure it's worth the cost.

I do have a friend that has a '98 Fleetwood Discovery 36' that came with the 275 HP Cummins and, he later installed the Banks kit for it and, basically, it's everything I can do to keep up with him, on grades or flat. That kit, on his anyway, made a serious difference. Sure can't figure out why CAT won't accept a kit like that.
__________________
2004 ITASCA HORIZON 36GD, 2011 GMC Sierra 1500 4x4 Toad '20 Honda NC750X DCT
2018 Goldwing Tour DCT Airbag
Retired-29.5 yrs, SDFD, Ham - KI6OND
Me, Karla and the Heidi character, (mini Schnauzer)!
FIRE UP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 05:43 PM   #65
Senior Member
 
CAT2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 107
It's not a bigger HP engine that will get you up the hill it's torque. The ability to move weight at a constant speed not how fast you can accelerate to a speed.
CAT2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 08:07 PM   #66
Senior Member
 
jauguston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bellingham,WA
Posts: 973
2000,

Are you trying to tell us that two coaches one with 250hp and one with 350 hp will go up a hill the same speed due to some other factor? I don't think so.
__________________
2005 Sportscoach Elite 40' C-7 350 Cat w/MP-8
Suzuki Samurai toad w/VW 1.6 turbo diesel
800w solar system
jauguston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 08:46 PM   #67
Senior Member
 
CAT2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by jauguston View Post
2000,

Are you trying to tell us that two coaches one with 250hp and one with 350 hp will go up a hill the same speed due to some other factor? I don't think so.
I'm telling you that It's torque that is the factor and depending on the gear ratio of the transmission and rear end that creates foot pounds of torque to the wheels that pushes you along. It's not HP.

Horsepower doesn't exist, it's a mathematical number from rpm, torque and a constant.

Torque is practical unit, like lbs, grams or miles its measurable, HP is a theory unit, it can't be used directly torque can.

Take a race car high HP gets up to speed fast but low torque can't pull Hugh loads, take a diesel truck low HP high torque huge pulling power. Farm tractor, a 100 HP tractor is considered pretty big and can pull huge implements through heavy soils because of torque.

Just saying!
CAT2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 08:52 PM   #68
Senior Member
 
Steve Ownby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cosby, Tn
Posts: 6,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAT2000 View Post
It's not a bigger HP engine that will get you up the hill it's torque. The ability to move weight at a constant speed not how fast you can accelerate to a speed.
The relationship between torque and HP is hard to explain and understand. Torque is a measurement of twisting force and is responsible for acceleration. HP is what gets you up the hill. That's why you climb in what ever gear puts you up at your HP peak.
__________________
Steve Ownby
Full time since 2007
2003 Monaco Signature
Steve Ownby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 09:10 PM   #69
Senior Member
 
CAT2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Ownby View Post

The relationship between torque and HP is hard to explain and understand. Torque is a measurement of twisting force and is responsible for acceleration. HP is what gets you up the hill. That's why you climb in what ever gear puts you up at your HP peak.
HP is about speed, how fast you accelerate, 0-60 time not getting you up the hill, my Cat does not run at HP peak to pull me at 55mph up a grade. If it starts dropping that speed it drops a gear for more torque to push it up. If you have ever noticed tractor trailers with 500, 600 HP engines aren't screaming up hills it's not the HP that gets them to the top it's the torque.
CAT2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2013, 09:45 PM   #70
Senior Member
 
B D HOWie's Avatar
 
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Forest River Owners Club
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 239
Jimbo2013 said:
Scott, your install looks good, just odd the way they made the pipes go across the whole coach and exit the opposite side of the exhaust manifold that will not be as efficient perhaps.

I wonder if that may contribute to lack of poorer mpg than it could be, but I'm no expert, just a guess.

Jimbo
I am confused by last sentence. Less efficient is better gas mileage??
Paul[/QUOTE]
__________________
Big Dog House On Wheels
2013 Coachmen Freelander 28QB
on 2012 E4500 Chevrolet chassis
B D HOWie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.