Go Back   iRV2 Forums > TRUCK CONVERSIONS, MDT's & HDT's FORUMS > Bus Conversions
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 10-04-2008, 10:51 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6
Which is best a transmission retarder or exhaust brake? Will both work with cruise control? What are the advantages of each?
__________________

__________________
Leo B is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 10-04-2008, 10:51 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6
Which is best a transmission retarder or exhaust brake? Will both work with cruise control? What are the advantages of each?
__________________

__________________
Leo B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 05:06 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Bikeboy57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 156
Trans retarder usually has five or six degrees of braking, most jakes have high and low.

Trans retarder in the rigs I have driven seems to kick in a little smoother.

Need to make sure the trannie has it's own cooler when using a retarder for mountain descents.

The exhaust brake and cruise control fought each other in both rigs I've owned.
__________________
Richard, Rhonda, Ty, and Alex

1995 Newell, 470HP Detroit Diesel Series 60
Bikeboy57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 05:50 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6
Thanks Richard!
__________________
Leo B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 05:38 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1
Leo,

From what I have learned the trans retarder is the least desired because it generates lots of heat for the engine radiator to get rid of. You should be at zero throttle when using it so the stock radiator "should" suffice. Still, I hear most recommending that an aux trans cooler/radiator/heat exchanger be added. Heating up the trans much over 220 will severely shorten the life of the trans.

The problem with Jakes is that they must be properly adjusted every couple years...like the valves. Is that a problem? They don't work much if not set properly but that doesn't hurt much. They make a ton of noise but most drivers seem to like it as it is a throaty growl. Communities bordering freeways and in deep valleys are sick of the racket and some hills have "NO JAKES" signs posted for noise abaitment. Those signs are ignored in favor of living thru the downhill.

The best ever is the Telma Retarder. Google that one. Almost standard equip in Europe and here on school buses.

Good luck.

John
__________________
johned is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 06:06 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6
Thanks John!
__________________
Leo B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2009, 09:30 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 311
Transmissions with output retarders should use a separate oil/water cooler of tube and shell design. Max temp to the cooler allowed is 300F. Retarders are allowed to go to 330F intermittently. The retarder cooling systems are tested with either a 0-30-0 cooling test until temps stabilize, or 0-40-0.

An exhaust brake (a jake is a compression brake) when used with an Allison six speed is normally interfaced with the trans ECU to request a preselect shift schedule to D4 when the exhaust brake is energized. This is because exhaust brakes need engine RPM to be efficient. The retarder absorbs much more engine HP than the exhaust brake, but it is expensive.

There's nothing wrong with the Telma either, if it's electrical connections are hooked up correctly and the driveline that contains it retains properly angularity and phasing after the Telma is installed.
__________________

__________________
dbarton291 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Retarder or just exhaust brake on '93 C.C. Magna? David Jarrett Vintage RV's 1 09-06-2008 07:35 AM
Brake Retarder vs. Pac-Brake Gadget Man MH-General Discussions & Problems 9 06-30-2008 09:38 AM
Engine Brake, Exhaust Brake again, sorry! redeldo Monaco Owner's Forum 11 03-03-2008 01:14 PM
Engine Brake, Exhaust Brake again, sorry! MH-General Discussions & Problems 11 12-31-1969 07:00 PM
Brake Retarder vs. Pac-Brake Fleetwood Products Owner's Forum 9 12-31-1969 07:00 PM

» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.