|
|
09-26-2006, 11:46 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wyandotte, Michigan
Posts: 232
|
Ok, just suspose you find a floor plan you like on X brand motor home and you have to decide which engine to use, the 8.1 Vortec or one of the optional diesel engines. Lets say the diesel option is an extra $7,000.00 and in your area, diesel costs 50-60 cents/gal. more than gas. Would you pay extra for the diesel or would you just pocket then extra money and go with the tried and true 8.1? Unless I had more money than I knew what to do with, I think I would go with the 8.1, because not only would it cost less, but I wouldn't have to pay the extra sales tax on the $7,000.00 upcharge, and paying 60 cents a gallon extra kind of wipes out the extra value of increased MPG from the diesel. Furthermore, if a 8.1 is well maintained and will last for 250,000 miles, how many people actually keep their motor homes for 250,000 miles? Well, what would you do under these circumstances? Chuck/Bagman57
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
09-26-2006, 11:46 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wyandotte, Michigan
Posts: 232
|
Ok, just suspose you find a floor plan you like on X brand motor home and you have to decide which engine to use, the 8.1 Vortec or one of the optional diesel engines. Lets say the diesel option is an extra $7,000.00 and in your area, diesel costs 50-60 cents/gal. more than gas. Would you pay extra for the diesel or would you just pocket then extra money and go with the tried and true 8.1? Unless I had more money than I knew what to do with, I think I would go with the 8.1, because not only would it cost less, but I wouldn't have to pay the extra sales tax on the $7,000.00 upcharge, and paying 60 cents a gallon extra kind of wipes out the extra value of increased MPG from the diesel. Furthermore, if a 8.1 is well maintained and will last for 250,000 miles, how many people actually keep their motor homes for 250,000 miles? Well, what would you do under these circumstances? Chuck/Bagman57
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 12:28 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Thor Owners Club KZ RV Club
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington, Columbia River
Posts: 838
|
For me that is an easy answer as I once had a diesel and the wife and I prefer the gas and of course me the 8.1. But now that there is other options on the floor plan I would have to consider the rear gas when the time comes.
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 01:03 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern Ont. Canada
Posts: 865
|
My vote would be for the gas engine also. From what I have seen the guys with diesels don't keep them and run up the miles. Many are sold with rather low miles, so why the diesel? My last MH, a gasser, had over 135,000 miles and was still going strong.
__________________
98 Gulf Stream
460 w/banks
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 01:21 PM
|
#5
|
Moderator Emeritus
Nor'easters Club Workhorse Chassis Owner iRV2 No Limits Club
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 30,785
|
If the time comes would go gas and UFO wonder what Newmar has up its sleeve for 2007 08.
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 01:36 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Crossville, TN USA
Posts: 1,124
|
You can buy a lot of gas for $7000.0 I would stay with the gas engine.
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 01:56 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wyandotte, Michigan
Posts: 232
|
I wouldn't exactly call this a scientific poll, but thus far the score is 5 (gas) vs 0 (diesel). Bagman57.
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 04:22 PM
|
#8
|
Junior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 15
|
My vote is for gas. Frank
__________________
2003 Allergo 35 Da 2000 accord toad nightshift auto tow bar
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 06:44 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Valley, California
Posts: 1,743
|
Had a Diesel... Didn't like it....
Have a 8.1 with the ultrapower upgrade and I love it
__________________
2020 F-150 4x4 3.5 Super Crew Cab
2024 Starcraft 189RG
God Bless Us All
|
|
|
09-27-2006, 12:50 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: oak hills ca
Posts: 91
|
Well Ill have to throw my 2cents in and add that the total cost of the motorhome would have to be considered as the diesel is a 7k option but maby adds just 5k to the real cost of the rig. Then you have to consider what the diesel adds to the resale figure and you might find out that that diesel platform only costs a few thousand bucks real money. ALMOST the same cost of that UltraPower performance add on. Just a thought...
__________________
Warren and Julia
Hurricane UT
|
|
|
09-27-2006, 01:08 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Thor Owners Club KZ RV Club
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington, Columbia River
Posts: 838
|
Now add in the soot, it is getting better, more expensive fuel, higher maintenance, i.e., oil changes, filters, etc., noise level. But now with rear engine gas GVW will not be so much of an issue anymore. It will be like do you want an RCA or a Zenith.
|
|
|
09-27-2006, 02:11 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wyandotte, Michigan
Posts: 232
|
If the diesel version of the "UFO" gets 20% better fuel economy, but gas cost 20% less per gallon (Michigan fuel costs), I see the only advantage of the diesel being a longer cruising range. The gas version should have a higher ccc. Bagman57
|
|
|
09-27-2006, 02:51 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Damon Owners Club
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 223
|
Probably go with the 8.1 as well. Even $5000 upgrade charge might not be worth it if you don't put a lot of miles on the coach.
Now if the right deal comes along on a diesel UFO (set on dealer lot a while...) then we'll have to see. Most uf us do not order a coach and buy what is on the dealer lot....
__________________
Sean & Eddie
2007 Damon Tuscany 4055
Koa the puppy
|
|
|
09-27-2006, 04:39 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,566
|
Another vote for the 8.1 gas...at least for now....
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|