Join CruisersForum Today
Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Ultra Power programming
Old 08-07-2009, 04:29 AM   #1
Ron & Dee is offline
Senior Member
Ron & Dee's Avatar
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,147
I hope this is not a dumb question, but if it is just consider the source

Is it possible to program the UP to work different in the higher altitudes than at sea level or lower altitudes?

I seem to be getting better mpg averages, according to my Scangauge, in the higher altitudes than I am in the lower altitudes.

I know there are probably other variables in play but was just curious about the difference

Thanks,

Ron

__________________
2002 32' Adventurer 8.1 Workhorse
2 black cats+Sweetie Pie no toad
Florida
  Reply With Quote
   
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-07-2009, 10:22 AM   #2
JonBrazel is offline
Senior Member
JonBrazel's Avatar
Official iRV2 Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Centralia, WA
Posts: 603
Blog Entries: 6
To answer your question, no there is no difference made in the program to account for altitude. The reason you are seeing better MPG at higher elevations is because there is less air which equals less fuel used to maintain proper air/fuel ratios.

__________________
Jon Brazel - Engine Performance Technician
Brazel's RV Performance Center & RV Park
www.brazelsrv.com * 877-786-1576
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-07-2009, 10:38 AM   #3
Ron & Dee is offline
Senior Member
Ron & Dee's Avatar
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,147
Thanks Jon,

I guess that would also explain why you can get by with the lower octane at the higher altitudes.

That would also explain how some people can show better gas mileage than we do down here at sea level.

Ron
__________________
2002 32' Adventurer 8.1 Workhorse
2 black cats+Sweetie Pie no toad
Florida
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-07-2009, 12:28 PM   #4
golden is offline
Senior Member


Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 669
I really haven't travelled here in the mountains in my MH very much, Rather, I drove up from TX and enjoyed the ride with more power than prior to UP. That being said, my Saturn Vue gets 4-7 mpg better mileage here at altitude than back home at 750'. Also, it is a LOT cooler here than back home!
__________________
Denny & Kylene, Abby (Golden) and Josie (Sheltie),
2004 Itasca Suncruiser 38R, W22, Ultrapower
2012 Jeep Wrangler Sport Unlimited
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-07-2009, 03:21 PM   #5
rgrstndgby is offline
Senior Member


Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tucson
Posts: 602
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonBrazel View Post
To answer your question, no there is no difference made in the program to account for altitude. The reason you are seeing better MPG at higher elevations is because there is less air which equals less fuel used to maintain proper air/fuel ratios.


Jon, are you saying that at the SAME SPEED, you will use less fuel at altidude?...rgr...
__________________
2004 Winnebago 33V, WH
2010 Honda CRV
Jim, Lynda, and our 6/2010 model Weimaraner, Quincy, aka Q Man
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-07-2009, 06:08 PM   #6
oemtech is offline
Senior Member
oemtech's Avatar


Commercial Member
Newmar Owners Club
Texas Boomers Club
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jarrell, TX 76537
Posts: 3,792
Send a message via AIM to oemtech
I think want Jon is saying is... As your altitude changes the O2 sensors, knock sensors etc will use the fuel enrichment maps to try and compensate for the changes. Remember the ECM, O2 sensors Knock sensors etc are trying to maintain a 14.7:1 fuel ratio with no ping.

You will NOT gain HP you will actually lose 2% to 3% per 1,000 ft of altitude. So, had you had a stock tune with say 265 hp at the rear wheels and were at 8,000 ft and we use 2% you would lose approx 42 hp.
__________________
Dale/aka-Oemy Oemy's UltraPower Performance
Ultra Power'd/Ultra Trac'd/Magnum Plug Wires/AC 41-101's/DIY CAI/Koni's
2004 Mountain Aire MACA 3651-1997 Honda CRV - Toad
  Reply With Quote
   
Smile
Old 08-07-2009, 07:28 PM   #7
TrekPR is offline
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 176
I always thought driving at altitude equaled better milage because of less wind resistance and humidity. Sea level the air is thick and heavy because of the atmosphere pressure and humidity. It is the same reason a golf ball travels further at altitude. I wish I could figure out how to get to altitude without going up hill.
__________________
Paul
W20/Trek28RB2
  Reply With Quote
   
Cool
Old 08-07-2009, 07:28 PM   #8
rgrstndgby is offline
Senior Member


Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tucson
Posts: 602
Quote:
Originally Posted by oemtech View Post
I think want Jon is saying is... As your altitude changes the O2 sensors, knock sensors etc will use the fuel enrichment maps to try and compensate for the changes. Remember the ECM, O2 sensors Knock sensors etc are trying to maintain a 14.7:1 fuel ratio with no ping.

You will NOT gain HP you will actually lose 2% to 3% per 1,000 ft of altitude. So, had you had a stock tune with say 265 hp at the rear wheels and were at 8,000 ft and we use 2% you would lose approx 42 hp.
.................................................. .................................................

yea, I understand all that, I thought it sounded like he was implying that due to the diminished O2,and subsequent lessened fuel demand, that speed could be maintained on less fuel.. That would put those guys onto something really special... rgr...
__________________
2004 Winnebago 33V, WH
2010 Honda CRV
Jim, Lynda, and our 6/2010 model Weimaraner, Quincy, aka Q Man
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-09-2009, 09:28 AM   #9
DriVer is online now
iRV2 Marketing
DriVer's Avatar


Winnebago Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Coastal Campers
Carolina Campers
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conway, SC
Posts: 20,573
Blog Entries: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron & Dee View Post
I seem to be getting better mpg averages, according to my Scangauge, in the higher altitudes than I am in the lower altitudes.
Ron, The thinner atmosphere up at that altitude reduces the coefficient of friction on the frontal area of your vehicle thereby increasing your fuel economy!
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-09-2009, 03:29 PM   #10
Ron & Dee is offline
Senior Member
Ron & Dee's Avatar
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by DriVer View Post
Ron, The thinner atmosphere up at that altitude reduces the coefficient of friction on the frontal area of your vehicle thereby increasing your fuel economy!
And then if things weigh less at higher altitudes, it would take less energy to move them

Ron
__________________
2002 32' Adventurer 8.1 Workhorse
2 black cats+Sweetie Pie no toad
Florida
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-09-2009, 09:07 PM   #11
TrekPR is offline
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 176
I tried for for 30 minutes to figure out how to add icons in the original post especially the whistling one. Where am I going wrong?
__________________
Paul
W20/Trek28RB2
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-09-2009, 10:05 PM   #12
oemtech is offline
Senior Member
oemtech's Avatar


Commercial Member
Newmar Owners Club
Texas Boomers Club
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jarrell, TX 76537
Posts: 3,792
Send a message via AIM to oemtech
Don't use the Quick Reply.. use the Post Reply.

If you use Quick Reply an want to add a "smiley" you will have to Edit it in the first hour. But you wil have to do a full Edit by clciking the Edit button on the Edit screen. Confused

OBTW - I posted this with Quick Edit and then went back and did the Edit/Edit to add the
__________________
Dale/aka-Oemy Oemy's UltraPower Performance
Ultra Power'd/Ultra Trac'd/Magnum Plug Wires/AC 41-101's/DIY CAI/Koni's
2004 Mountain Aire MACA 3651-1997 Honda CRV - Toad
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-10-2009, 05:46 AM   #13
DriVer is online now
iRV2 Marketing
DriVer's Avatar


Winnebago Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Coastal Campers
Carolina Campers
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conway, SC
Posts: 20,573
Blog Entries: 66
If a person chooses to use the "Post Reply" button to the left of the bottom of the posts in this topic one could expect a right column full of smilies. Now you can also get to those if you click on the "Advanced" button as well and the bottom of the edit screen. Click on the [more] for a whole bunch more of content in the smile library.
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-10-2009, 11:53 AM   #14
M&EM is offline
Senior Member


Workhorse Chassis Owner
National RV Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by DriVer View Post
Ron, The thinner atmosphere up at that altitude reduces the coefficient of friction on the frontal area of your vehicle thereby increasing your fuel economy!
Then we must also remember to include the effects of increase in relative tire pressure at higher altitudes which would result in lower rolling resistance....

__________________
2003 34' Dolphin 5342,
W22, UP, UPGBrake, F and R Track Bars, Rear IPD sway bar, Koni FSDs, Safe-T-Plus
  Reply With Quote
   
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
use of Ultra Power on 8.1L GM Gas ret4fish Workhorse Custom Chassis Motorhome Forum 95 02-10-2009 04:09 PM
Loss of Shore/Generator Power RVersOnline Alpine Coach Forum 6 06-26-2008 07:59 PM
No AC power from Generator or Shore power Dale777 Alpine Coach Forum 15 12-20-2007 01:46 AM
Ultra Power air box Craig H MH-General Discussions & Problems 3 05-07-2007 04:40 AM
No Eletrical Power from Power Tech Generator Field Trip Newmar Owner's Forum 5 09-27-2005 05:23 PM

Download our Mobile App






1% for the Planet
» Upcoming Rallies
No events scheduled in
the next 365 days.
» iRV2 on facebook

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 AM.