 |
|
08-07-2009, 04:29 AM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,147
|
I hope this is not a dumb question, but if it is just consider the source
Is it possible to program the UP to work different in the higher altitudes than at sea level or lower altitudes?
I seem to be getting better mpg averages, according to my Scangauge, in the higher altitudes than I am in the lower altitudes.
I know there are probably other variables in play but was just curious about the difference
Thanks,
Ron
__________________
2002 32' Adventurer 8.1 Workhorse
2 black cats+Sweetie Pie no toad
Florida
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
08-07-2009, 10:22 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Official iRV2 Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Centralia, WA
Posts: 603
|
To answer your question, no there is no difference made in the program to account for altitude. The reason you are seeing better MPG at higher elevations is because there is less air which equals less fuel used to maintain proper air/fuel ratios.
__________________
Jon Brazel - Engine Performance Technician
Brazel's RV Performance Center & RV Park
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-07-2009, 10:38 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,147
|
Thanks Jon,
I guess that would also explain why you can get by with the lower octane at the higher altitudes.
That would also explain how some people can show better gas mileage than we do down here at sea level.
Ron
__________________
2002 32' Adventurer 8.1 Workhorse
2 black cats+Sweetie Pie no toad
Florida
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-07-2009, 12:28 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 669
|
I really haven't travelled here in the mountains in my MH very much, Rather, I drove up from TX and enjoyed the ride with more power than prior to UP. That being said, my Saturn Vue gets 4-7 mpg better mileage here at altitude than back home at 750'. Also, it is a LOT cooler here than back home!
__________________
Denny & Kylene, Abby (Golden) and Josie (Sheltie),
2004 Itasca Suncruiser 38R, W22, Ultrapower
2012 Jeep Wrangler Sport Unlimited
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-07-2009, 03:21 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tucson
Posts: 602
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonBrazel
To answer your question, no there is no difference made in the program to account for altitude. The reason you are seeing better MPG at higher elevations is because there is less air which equals less fuel used to maintain proper air/fuel ratios.
|
Jon, are you saying that at the SAME SPEED, you will use less fuel at altidude?...rgr...
__________________
2004 Winnebago 33V, WH
2010 Honda CRV
Jim, Lynda, and our 6/2010 model Weimaraner, Quincy, aka Q Man
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-07-2009, 06:08 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Commercial Member
Newmar Owners Club Texas Boomers Club
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jarrell, TX 76537
Posts: 3,792
|
I think want Jon is saying is... As your altitude changes the O2 sensors, knock sensors etc will use the fuel enrichment maps to try and compensate for the changes. Remember the ECM, O2 sensors Knock sensors etc are trying to maintain a 14.7:1 fuel ratio with no ping.
You will NOT gain HP you will actually lose 2% to 3% per 1,000 ft of altitude. So, had you had a stock tune with say 265 hp at the rear wheels and were at 8,000 ft and we use 2% you would lose approx 42 hp.
__________________
Dale/aka-Oemy Oemy's UltraPower Performance
Ultra Power'd/Ultra Trac'd/Magnum Plug Wires/AC 41-101's/DIY CAI/Koni's
2004 Mountain Aire MACA 3651-1997 Honda CRV - Toad
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-07-2009, 07:28 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 176
|
I always thought driving at altitude equaled better milage because of less wind resistance and humidity. Sea level the air is thick and heavy because of the atmosphere pressure and humidity. It is the same reason a golf ball travels further at altitude. I wish I could figure out how to get to altitude without going up hill.
__________________
Paul
W20/Trek28RB2
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-07-2009, 07:28 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tucson
Posts: 602
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oemtech
I think want Jon is saying is... As your altitude changes the O2 sensors, knock sensors etc will use the fuel enrichment maps to try and compensate for the changes. Remember the ECM, O2 sensors Knock sensors etc are trying to maintain a 14.7:1 fuel ratio with no ping.
You will NOT gain HP you will actually lose 2% to 3% per 1,000 ft of altitude. So, had you had a stock tune with say 265 hp at the rear wheels and were at 8,000 ft and we use 2% you would lose approx 42 hp.
|
.................................................. .................................................
yea, I understand all that, I thought it sounded like he was implying that due to the diminished O2,and subsequent lessened fuel demand, that speed could be maintained on less fuel.. That would put those guys onto something really special... rgr...
__________________
2004 Winnebago 33V, WH
2010 Honda CRV
Jim, Lynda, and our 6/2010 model Weimaraner, Quincy, aka Q Man
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-09-2009, 09:28 AM
|
#9
|
|
iRV2 Marketing
Winnebago Owners Club Workhorse Chassis Owner Coastal Campers Carolina Campers
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conway, SC
Posts: 20,573
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron & Dee
I seem to be getting better mpg averages, according to my Scangauge, in the higher altitudes than I am in the lower altitudes.
|
Ron, The thinner atmosphere up at that altitude reduces the coefficient of friction on the frontal area of your vehicle thereby increasing your fuel economy!
__________________
03 Adventurer 38G, Workhorse W22
F&R Track Bars, Safety+ , Ultrapower, Allison UP Grade Brake, S&B CAI, Taylor Extremes, SGII-X Gauge
TST 507, Blue Ox, SMI, Koni FSD, CrossFire
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-09-2009, 03:29 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,147
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DriVer
|
And then if things weigh less at higher altitudes, it would take less energy to move them
Ron
__________________
2002 32' Adventurer 8.1 Workhorse
2 black cats+Sweetie Pie no toad
Florida
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-09-2009, 09:07 PM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 176
|
I tried for for 30 minutes to figure out how to add icons in the original post especially the whistling one. Where am I going wrong?
__________________
Paul
W20/Trek28RB2
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-09-2009, 10:05 PM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Commercial Member
Newmar Owners Club Texas Boomers Club
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jarrell, TX 76537
Posts: 3,792
|
Don't use the Quick Reply.. use the Post Reply.
If you use Quick Reply an want to add a "smiley" you will have to Edit it in the first hour. But you wil have to do a full Edit by clciking the Edit button on the Edit screen. Confused
OBTW - I posted this with Quick Edit and then went back and did the Edit/Edit to add the
__________________
Dale/aka-Oemy Oemy's UltraPower Performance
Ultra Power'd/Ultra Trac'd/Magnum Plug Wires/AC 41-101's/DIY CAI/Koni's
2004 Mountain Aire MACA 3651-1997 Honda CRV - Toad
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-10-2009, 05:46 AM
|
#13
|
|
iRV2 Marketing
Winnebago Owners Club Workhorse Chassis Owner Coastal Campers Carolina Campers
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conway, SC
Posts: 20,573
|
If a person chooses to use the "Post Reply" button to the left of the bottom of the posts in this topic one could expect a right column full of smilies. Now you can also get to those if you click on the "Advanced" button as well and the bottom of the edit screen. Click on the [more] for a whole bunch more of content in the smile library.
__________________
03 Adventurer 38G, Workhorse W22
F&R Track Bars, Safety+ , Ultrapower, Allison UP Grade Brake, S&B CAI, Taylor Extremes, SGII-X Gauge
TST 507, Blue Ox, SMI, Koni FSD, CrossFire
|
|
|
|
| |
|
08-10-2009, 11:53 AM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner National RV Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,040
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DriVer
|
Then we must also remember to include the effects of increase in relative tire pressure at higher altitudes which would result in lower rolling resistance....
__________________
2003 34' Dolphin 5342,
W22, UP, UPGBrake, F and R Track Bars, Rear IPD sway bar, Koni FSDs, Safe-T-Plus
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|

»
Recent Discussions

»
Upcoming Rallies
No events scheduled in the next 365 days.
|
»
iRV2 on facebook
|