Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > THE CHASSIS CLUB FORUMS > Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-10-2009, 11:25 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 186
85 Octane

Anybody run the cheap 85 octane gasoline found in the midwest? I have a 2008 V10 and was just wondering if I needed to stick with the 87 octane or if the cheap stuff is OK.

Thanks
__________________
2009 Winnebago Sightseer 35J
John Mo is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 07-10-2009, 01:49 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
DandS's Avatar
 
Newmar Owners Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 920
Copied from owners manual of my v-10 : "Your vehicle is designed to use
“Regular” unleaded gasoline with
pump (R+M)/2 octane rating of 87.
We do not recommend the use of
gasolines labeled as “Regular” that
are sold with octane ratings of 86 or lower in high altitude areas."


That said, not sure if it would do damage or not, but I guess I would rather be safe than sorry !
__________________
Dave
2010 Canyon Star 3647
2010 Ford Escape
DandS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 02:03 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
wa8yxm's Avatar
 
Damon Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24,024
As I understand it you do not need as high an octane rating in higher altitudes.... That said, rig did not run well on 85.. You can always add a little premimum to the tank to bring it up (That is, in fact, how multi-octane pumps often do it, mix super premium with regular to get the rating you select)
__________________
Home is where I park it!
wa8yxm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 02:09 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
LVJ58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,296
I have on occasion used the lower octane fuel in our coach but generally pay more for the higher octane in those areas mentioned. Never noticed any appreciable difference in fuel mileage nor did I experience any pre-ignition knock from the engine. I agree though best to stick with the octane recommended by the engine manufacturer.
__________________
Jim & SherrySeward

2000 Residency 3790 v10 w/tags 5 Star tune & Banks system Suzuki XL7 toad
LVJ58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 07:11 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North East Indiana
Posts: 1,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mo View Post
Anybody run the cheap 85 octane gasoline found in the midwest? I have a 2008 V10 and was just wondering if I needed to stick with the 87 octane or if the cheap stuff is OK.

Thanks
Unless you can't get 87 what would be the advantage of running 85. I live in the Midwest and have never seen 85 octane fuel, with the exception of Sunoco.
Izzyblueye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 09:35 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 186
I stuck with the 87, figuring that was what was "recommended." But I did wonder if the engine electronics were advanced enough that the 85 would be OK and compensated for. Sounds like it would work, but not really a good idea. Thanks.
__________________
2009 Winnebago Sightseer 35J
John Mo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 01:02 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,968
In Wisconsin the only 85 octane fuel I've seen is E85 (ethanol). It isn't recommended for vehicles that require 87 octane regular fuel. It's only supposed to be used in "Flex Fuel" (ethanol compatible) vehicles.
__________________
Hikerdogs
2013 Adventurer 32H
Hikerdogs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 01:09 PM   #8
Member
 
John90XJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 97
I did a trip through Utah and Nevada a couple months ago and followed the manufacturer's manual and filled the tank with 87 octane while in UT.

On a previous trips while driving the Jeep, and not the motorhome, I've done the 7-8,000 foot passes with the 85 in the tank and noticed no difference whatsoever.

I would have to guess the octane rating wouldn't make that big a difference but it doesn't seem to be worth the $5 in savings each fill-up to find out. I'd rather play it safe.
__________________
2001.5 Discovery 38D
F402770
John90XJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 01:39 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
two2go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 1,056
Altitude changes the burn characteristic of gasoline. I don't know the chemistry, but going higher allows octane to be reduced. All regular in most of Colo. is 85 octane and is fine for any engine that runs on regular 87 at lower altitudes, so save your money unless you really experience a problem. I saw 86 octane at a station that was about 3000', the first time I saw an intermediate octane. I had an Audi that required 89 per the manual, but it ran fine on 85 in Denver. The engine computer compensated although with a slight mileage and performance penalty. I have noticed when I take my tow'd to a lower altitude and still have a tank of 85 gas in it, I can sense a bit of knock and lower performance.
__________________
2017 Coachmen Orion, Ford Transit 3.7L: previous
'09 Pleasure Way Lexor, '05 NRV Dolphin 5342
two2go is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 05:52 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Texas Boomers Club
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cypress, Texas USA
Posts: 8,854
Higher altitude > lower air density > lower compression pressures > lower peak firing pressures = less horsepower, less torque with the result being reduced tendency for the air/fuel mixture to detonate (knock or ping).

The chemistry doesn't change at higher altitudes, just the engine operating characteristics.

Rusty
RustyJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 02:34 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Big Bear Lake, Ca
Posts: 915
Since octane is measured in a knock engine by altering the engines compression it would suggest that if the 85 octane is not knocking then it's use is fine. However if it knocks don't use it.
__________________
2004 CRV TOAD/1990 WRANGLER TOAD ROCK BUILT
Forest Grump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 07:58 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Wizard's Avatar
 
Winnebago Owners Club
Freightliner Owners Club
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Home on the hill in Georgia
Posts: 2,742
I'm traveling around Wyoming and everywhere I've filled up the only thing available was 85. The FJ in Cheyenne was replacing fuel tank or something and was selling 93 at the 85 price at all pumps. I didn't seem to tell much difference running the 93. Still had to refill a few miles down the road.
__________________
Jerry Potter, Taz
1999 Coachman Catalina Sport
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Wizard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 09:01 AM   #13
Member
 
Dave G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Goleta, CA., USA
Posts: 55
85 octane

I have used it all the time in higher altitudes as it is sold as the regular gasoline. Have made many trips and never had any problems.
__________________
2001 Dolphin 5332
2002 Honda CR-V
Dave G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2009, 06:44 PM   #14
Member
 
BounderDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 77
While in the Rockies I used the 85 octane a couple of times in the motorhome (Bounder with V-10) and the only difference I noticed was the price. also used it in our toad (Saturn Vue, 4 cylinder) and it also ran fine at altitude. However, upon returning home to near sea-level with a half tank of the 85 still in the Saturn the check engine light came on. Owners manual noted that this could be caused by low octane gas. Promptly filled up with 93 octane (mix should have come to about 89 octane) and after about 80 miles the light went out. It seems the lower octane stuff is okay if you stay at or above four or five thousand feet. The temperature and humidity was a lot better up there too. Danny
__________________
Excursion 33D & Vue Toad
BounderDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anti-Knock sensor Trek-Cyclist Workhorse and Chevrolet Chassis Motorhome Forum 16 01-25-2007 08:11 AM
Difference in Gas Hamie Workhorse and Chevrolet Chassis Motorhome Forum 21 07-12-2006 08:57 AM
20% Ethanol Gasoline for Minnesota DonavonP Workhorse and Chevrolet Chassis Motorhome Forum 4 07-23-2005 03:43 PM
New Diesel Owner. (Cool Down) John & Sheri Trailer Towing and Tow Vehicles Discussion 61 05-10-2005 07:49 PM
octane ?? jodann iRV2.com General Discussion 4 05-10-2005 06:37 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.