Quote:
Originally Posted by gruelens
As mentioned before, the factory set up is restrictive to the large displacement 8 cylinder 460 Ford. The Banks plumbing helps get air into and out of the engine. Banks claims gains up to 85 hp. and 118 ft lbs of torque. That can significantly increase your power to weight ratio.
The OP asked if the Banks system is worth the money. I would suggest that is a personal decision for an individual. Each has different financial situations and priorities.
|
I agree with this poster on all counts, but I feel the part I highlighted in red deserves some more explanation. These power and torque gains are enormous; could they possibly be true?
I looked more closely. I would have expected that the gains would be the result of a comparison between peak power before and after and between peak torque before and after.
That's not what Banks does. The nature of a more free flowing exhaust system is to be less restrictive, and the higher the rpms rise, the more that lack of restriction is felt. So the rpms at which peak power and torque happen are higher. So at the rpms at which a banks equipped engine is making best powwer or best torque, the standard engine has had a reduction in power or torque from its maximum. That means that if we measure power or torque increase at these higher rpms, we'll see a bigger difference.
And that's what Banks does in their advertising. It's not what I expected, but that doesn't make it wrong. I think they do good enough engineering that they don't need this level of marketing, but that's just me.
Do their products make more power or torque than the other exhaust systems out there if we measure them in the same way? I don't know, but that would be the way to fairly compare them.
In my opinion they're good, but not enough better than the Gibson system I bought to justify the extra cost. And some of the other manufacturers seem to be phasing out their 460 systems, so there will be less choice in the future.
I'm not sure I'm such a fan of their Transcommand product. Their explanation of the problem they are trying to solve is spot-on, but I think it can be better solved with a mild "shift kit" to hydraulically speed up the shifts.