Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > THE CHASSIS CLUB FORUMS > Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum
Click Here to Login
Register FilesVendors Registry Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-27-2014, 09:57 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
LVRVLUVR's Avatar


 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
F53 chassis dyno ????

Anyone done it??? anyone know what the loss in rear hp would be on a 178'' wheel base.... and how much more loss on a 208???
LVRVLUVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-27-2014, 10:11 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Mr_D's Avatar
 
Country Coach Owners Club
Solo Rvers Club
iRV2 No Limits Club
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 37,725
Should be very close to the same. The only real difference is the driveshaft length and the rear axle ratio.
__________________
2009 45' Magna 630 w/Cummins ISX 650 HP/1950 Lbs Ft, HWH Active Air
Charter Good Sam Lifetime Member, FMCA,
RV'ing since 1957, NRA Benefactor Life, towing '21 Jeep JLU Rubicon Ecodiesel
Mr_D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2014, 10:18 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
LVRVLUVR's Avatar


 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_D View Post
Should be very close to the same. The only real difference is the driveshaft length and the rear axle ratio.
the 22.5's will eat up the lower gear..
LVRVLUVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 02:31 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
LVRVLUVR's Avatar


 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
anyway,... heres my winnabago /Itasca 27b tribute pulling a 24' trailer up a 6% grade...this is before I put the banks power kit on...

LVRVLUVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2015, 10:15 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
LVRVLUVR's Avatar


 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
this is my old 2012 30' allegro with out the trailer going up the same hill

this is before the banks was installed


LVRVLUVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2015, 12:59 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
joes2901's Avatar
 
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 757
2forceful,

Did you say the Itasca 27b with trailer speed was 50 or 60 MPH at the top of the grade? I am interested in your results with the Banks improvements, when will you be posting the information/video.

What MPG are you experiencing? My 2012 BayStar 2901 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02568.jpg
Views:	199
Size:	299.4 KB
ID:	82572seems to like 6.5 MPH at 58-59 MPH and weighs 25,100 lbs. with the 2008 Tacoma 4x4 Access Cab I usually tow.

Newmar built me a great short RV and it has taken another $34K to finish it the way I want it. We seem to like tweeking our machines to turn them into something better than OEM.
__________________
2012 Bay Star 2901, 2 ACs, 5.5KW Onan, 765W solar & Outback FM-60, 800 AH Lifeline AGMs & Magnum MS2812 + AGS + BMK, Koni FSDs, Safe-T-Plus, Super Steer Rear Track Bar, MCD Duo shades w/powered cockpit, remodeled galley, Sumo springs and 2008 Tacoma 4x4 toad.
joes2901 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2015, 03:27 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
LVRVLUVR's Avatar


 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by joes2901 View Post
2forceful,

Did you say the Itasca 27b with trailer speed was 50 or 60 MPH at the top of the grade? I am interested in your results with the Banks improvements, when will you be posting the information/video.

What MPG are you experiencing? My 2012 BayStar 2901 Attachment 82572seems to like 6.5 MPH at 58-59 MPH and weighs 25,100 lbs. with the 2008 Tacoma 4x4 Access Cab I usually tow.

Newmar built me a great short RV and it has taken another $34K to finish it the way I want it. We seem to like tweeking our machines to turn them into something better than OEM.
thanks for posting
I dropped to 50mph... the grade says 6%/....but that's on the down hill side....I think it's like 7% or more on the off ramp...I'm about 1600 lbs lighter than you...
LVRVLUVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2015, 11:45 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
LVRVLUVR's Avatar


 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
PowerPack® System

Here's a major dose of new RV power without the new RV price! PowerPack delivers 26% more horsepower and torque to your V-10: up to +56 hp and +70 lb-ft at the rear wheels. Rockets you up 6% grades 12% faster and chops three seconds off your 0-60 mph time. With PowerPack's engineered intake and exhaust upgrades plus calibrated fuel tuning (optional), your rig will pass and merge a whole lot easier and more safely—and you'll get up to 7% more MPG, too!
Please note:
Fits all Fleetwood and National RVs except 2004 and up Powerplatform and Duraframe models.

Check out these photos from a PowerPack installation on a 2011 coach (click to enlarge)





Here's the TEST REPORT
for your vehicle!

Get a hard copy in the mail »
View it right now online »


Test Vehicle:
2006 Thor 4-Winds Motorhome equipped with a 6.8L 30-valve Triton V-10 engine. While the engine is rated by the factory at 362 hp, on the dyno the stock best gain was only 242 hp.
Horsepower and torque measured at rear wheels.

Power @ Rear Wheels
Stock Motorhome
Banks PowerPack
Improvement Result Horsepower,
best gain 216.3 hp
(4200 rpm) 271.9 hp
(4200 rpm)
+55.6 horsepower 26% more Torque,
best gain 270.5 lb-ft
(4200 rpm) 340.0 lb-ft
(4200 rpm) +69.5 horsepower 26% more Horsepower,
peak-to-peak 242.1 hp
(5000 rpm) 284.9 hp
(4800 rpm) +42.8 horsepower 18% more Torque,
peak-to-peak 316.5 lb-ft
(3000 rpm) 360.6 lb-ft
(3600 rpm) +44.1 lb-ft torque 14% more Acceleration,
0-60 mp 24.20 sec
21.28 sec
-2.92 sec 12% quicker Acceleration,
40-60 mph 12.00 sec
10.36 sec
-1.64 sec
14% quicker Hillclimb speed,
6% grade
52 mph
(4th gear)
58 mph
(5th gear)
+6 mph
(+1 gear)
12% faster
Fuel economy
7.20 mpg
7.73 mpg
+0.53 mpg
7% better Banks' streamlined, stainless steel TorqueTubes (shown below compared to the stock headers) are the industry's only parallel 5-tube exhaust manifolds for RVs. Unlike competitors who add a separate tube length to a 4-tube formation, Banks integrates five tuned-length tubes into a design that allows rotational firing of the cylinders through the exhaust, minimizing backpressure and maximizing torque. The thick, 5/8-inch flanges never warp or leak.


System Includes:

Banks Ram-Air® Intake System


With its giant air filter housing, lifetime high-flow filter and streamlined tubing, Banks Ram-Air outflows stock by up to 60% for greater power and improved fuel efficiency.

read more...
TorqueTubes® Manifold Assembly


Maximize exhaust extraction and torque. And check out that amazing Power Pickle!

read more...
AutoMind Programmer


Power and diagnostic capability. It's a flexible all-in-one programmer and scan tool.

read more...

Application Year Range Part # PowerPack System, no AutoMind
Ford 6.8L MH A, Left Exit
Emissions compliant: CARB E.O. D-161-78 (TT), D-161-80 (RA) 2006-10 49377 PowerPack System, no AutoMind
Ford 6.8L MH A, Right Exit
Emissions compliant: CARB E.O. D-161-78 (TT), D-161-80 (RA) 2006-10 49378 PowerPack System, no AutoMind
Ford 6.8L MH A, Left Exit 2011-14 49379 PowerPack System, no AutoMind
Ford 6.8L MH A, Right Exit 2011-14 49380 PowerPack System, with AutoMind
Ford 6.8L MH A, Left Exit 2011-12 49381 PowerPack System, with AutoMind
Ford 6.8L MH A, Right Exit 2011-12 49382 PowerPack System, with AutoMind
Ford 6.8L MH A, Left Exit 2006-10 49493 PowerPack system, with AutoMind
Ford 6.8L MH A, Right Exit
Emissions compliant: CARB E.O. D-161-78 (TT), D-161-80 (RA), Rqd for OM 2006-10 49494 PowerPack System, with AutoMind
6.8L MH-A No EGR, Left Exit 2005 49498 PowerPack System, with AutoMind
6.8L MH-A No EGR, Right Exit 2005 49499 AutoMind Programmer
Ford 6.8L Motorhome Class-A & C 2005-12 66062
Owners Manual(s)

Power Systems- PowerPack, Stinger & TorqueTube systems, (Class-A) '05-12 Download Power Systems- PowerPack, Stinger & Git-Kit Systems, (Class-A) '97-05 Download Intake- Ram-Air Intake System, (Class-A) '06-08 Download Programmer- AutoMind Programmer (Ford) Download
RV Magazine reviews Banks PowerPack

2012-09-25


by Adam Blattenberg
For years the Banks Power badge on the side of an RV has always meants that a rig is packing some real horsepower. Today, that still holds true.So, when we were invited to participate in a day of testing with one of their newly improved upon RV's, we jumped at the chance.
For our test of the Banks PowerPack, we used a 2008 Class-A Damon Motor Coach powered by a V-10. When we arrived at the Banks complex in Azusa, California, the coach was strapped down to a chassis dynamometer (dyno for short). This is one of many things that would impress us during our stay at the Banks facility.
Everything they build goes through extensive testing both before and after the modifications have been made to guarantee an improvement. But outside the normal horsepower and torque tests, they look at what specific vehicle needs to do and concentrate on making it complete this task better.
For example, the federal minimum distance for a highway on-ramp is just shy of 1000 feet. Banks looks to reduce the distance it takes an RV to reach safe, highway speeds. In our case, post PowerPack install the distance to reach 60 mph was reduced by more than 200 feet, bringing the motorhome up to speed in 1092 feet. That's the length of more than a couple semis. What's even more impressive is these gains are achieved with better fuel economy than stock.
To read about and see all the details from the installation process, click below to keep reading this article...








Banks customer - 2011 Ford motorhome

George from Washington tells his story of why he decided to put a Banks Power system on his 2011 Ford Class-A motorhome.






Banks customer - 2010 Ford motorhome

Linda from Escondido, CA didn't just bring her motorhome to Banks for a PowerPack--she brought two of her friends and their motorhomes. Now all three will be getting to the tops of mountains faster, and doing it with better fuel economy.






Featured Video:

RV Today features Banks



Accolades
LVRVLUVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2015, 11:47 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
LVRVLUVR's Avatar


 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
so according to banks, the 362 hp is only 242 by the time it hits the rear wheels




Test Vehicle:
2006 Thor 4-Winds Motorhome equipped with a 6.8L 30-valve Triton V-10 engine. While the engine is rated by the factory at 362 hp, on the dyno the stock best gain was only 242 hp.
LVRVLUVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2015, 03:10 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
demoon's Avatar
 
National RV Owners Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 817
We had a full Power Pack, Ram Air and Transcommand installed on our 2001 V-10, 30' class c. We never had it on a dyno, but acceleration, hill climbing and overall performance improvement was just not there. Our stock, 06 V-10, 34' class a is a far better performer. We would not even consider spending the money we did for the Banks on the 01 again. I think the Banks is quality equipment and may help in the right application, but I also believe there are far less expensive alternatives, such as a 5 Star tune. (Don't have one, but like what a read about them).
Personal opinion, but close to 5K for the Banks on the 01 just was not worth what it did.
__________________
Neil, Lin, and our furry companions, Ashby and Cody. 06 National Surf Side.
demoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2015, 04:57 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
LVRVLUVR's Avatar


 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by demoon View Post
We had a full Power Pack, Ram Air and Transcommand installed on our 2001 V-10, 30' class c. We never had it on a dyno, but acceleration, hill climbing and overall performance improvement was just not there. Our stock, 06 V-10, 34' class a is a far better performer. We would not even consider spending the money we did for the Banks on the 01 again. I think the Banks is quality equipment and may help in the right application, but I also believe there are far less expensive alternatives, such as a 5 Star tune. (Don't have one, but like what a read about them).
Personal opinion, but close to 5K for the Banks on the 01 just was not worth what it did.
5 grand for the banks is pretty steep... your newer coach has 60 more horsepower stock...
LVRVLUVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2015, 10:19 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
demoon's Avatar
 
National RV Owners Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 817
5 grand for the banks is pretty steep... your newer coach has 60 more horsepower stock.

Roughly 2500 for the system directly from Banks + very close to another 2500 for the installation by the shop that Banks sent us to in our area.

I know that the 01 had 3 and the 06 has 362, but there is also nearly 6K pounds more weight. Banks claimed about 57 hp increase for the 310. My point is, just that the performance was just not noticeably improved on the 01 after the install. I will concede that the Transcommand did help a bit with the transmission's tendency to shift down at the sight of a hill, but the rest - could not really see a thing. Oh, it sounded nice.
__________________
Neil, Lin, and our furry companions, Ashby and Cody. 06 National Surf Side.
demoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2015, 10:35 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
LVRVLUVR's Avatar


 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by demoon View Post
5 grand for the banks is pretty steep... your newer coach has 60 more horsepower stock.

Roughly 2500 for the system directly from Banks + very close to another 2500 for the installation by the shop that Banks sent us to in our area.

I know that the 01 had 3 and the 06 has 362, but there is also nearly 6K pounds more weight. Banks claimed about 57 hp increase for the 310. My point is, just that the performance was just not noticeably improved on the 01 after the install. I will concede that the Transcommand did help a bit with the transmission's tendency to shift down at the sight of a hill, but the rest - could not really see a thing. Oh, it sounded nice.
that's where I'm at... the cross roads what to do what really works whats smoke and mirrors..

every banks kit I've done,, very noticeable... I drive the same hills constant

this time I wanna be able to say..this is what it really did

banks has the trans command.. guess you could set it where you want on shift points???

I see on here some have the banks and the 5 star??? why????

what does the 5 star do that the banks don't...
and vise versa
LVRVLUVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2015, 03:51 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
demoon's Avatar
 
National RV Owners Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 817
The Transcommand came programmed and since it worked well, I did not mess with it.
If someone has the full Banks, I do not understand what a 5 Star would add. As far as I know, it is a tuner.
I think your approach (your video), will be a much more realistic test of what the Banks did/does. Actual dyno testing seems to be a little hard to fit with real life results on the road.
Good luck with whatever you do. I'll be anxious to see what your real-life test shows.
__________________
Neil, Lin, and our furry companions, Ashby and Cody. 06 National Surf Side.
demoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
chassis, f53



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F53 24,000# 2008 chassis Love It!! Brockx Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum 7 11-24-2014 05:14 PM
Ford F53 Chassis Headlight problems flywindy Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum 10 11-22-2014 03:25 PM
Chassis Batteries Draining While Dry Camping holtt1 Monaco Owner's Forum 26 09-22-2014 04:52 PM
Any idea when next generation F53 chassis? Camp_Woof Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum 14 05-20-2014 05:19 PM
2011 RV chassis Mods & parts & Tech info new & old chassis "007" Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum 4 09-27-2011 07:26 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.