|
|
08-05-2018, 12:12 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Somewhere in US
Posts: 94
|
F53 Softer Leaf Spring Match Found?
Check out a potential softer F53 front leaf spring that seems like a direct bolt on!
From springs from an F53 (1994 to 1997) actually look like they may work.
Any thoughts?
__________________
Always Tinker
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
08-05-2018, 01:36 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,976
|
rvfigs-
Have you weighed your coach in loaded condition to determine the weight on the axles?
At a given load, a softer spring will deflect more. This changes the geometry of the suspension. I should think one result would be the axle would hit the bump stops more often.
In contrast, the Kelderman suspension typically combines a softer spring with an airbag. This maintains the geometry, while allowing a more comfortable ride.
__________________
Mark
2008 Holiday Rambler Admiral 30PDD (Ford F-53 chassis)
2009 Honda Fit Sport
|
|
|
08-06-2018, 04:45 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Somewhere in US
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by l1v3fr33ord1
rvfigs-
Have you weighed your coach in loaded condition to determine the weight on the axles?
At a given load, a softer spring will deflect more. This changes the geometry of the suspension. I should think one result would be the axle would hit the bump stops more often.
In contrast, the Kelderman suspension typically combines a softer spring with an airbag. This maintains the geometry, while allowing a more comfortable ride.
|
If we add SUMO springs...then we have essentially what Kelderman has...
This idea surfaced in the past by other members. The difficult part was tracking down an actual leaf spring that would fit.
As per Kelderman, the leaf springs they use have a spring capacity of 4400 (2200 each spring).
SUMO springs for the F53 18K chassis have a spring capacity of 2600lbs...I'm not sure if this is combined...
__________________
Always Tinker
|
|
|
08-06-2018, 08:50 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Altoona, Iowa
Posts: 1,668
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvfigs
If we add SUMO springs...then we have essentially what Kelderman has...
This idea surfaced in the past by other members. The difficult part was tracking down an actual leaf spring that would fit.
As per Kelderman, the leaf springs they use have a spring capacity of 4400 (2200 each spring).
SUMO springs for the F53 18K chassis have a spring capacity of 2600lbs...I'm not sure if this is combined...
|
The difference between the 22K chassis Kelderman front spring and the 22K chassis OEM spring is that the Kelderman spring has 7 leaves that are of varying length and each leaf is thinner than each leaf of the OEM spring.
This gives a progressive rate spring but has the same total load capacity as the OEM. The OEM spring has 2 leaves that are full length, thicker, carry the full load, and are very stiff.
The Kelderman design is a combination of the new progressive rate springs, air bags and softer shocks.
Top picture is Kelderman, the second is OEM.
__________________
2010 Itasca Sunova 33C, (lots of upgrades and modifications)
2011 Honda CRV, 2004 Rubicon (many modifications)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
|
|
08-06-2018, 12:51 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: TEJAS
Posts: 814
|
|
|
|
08-07-2018, 07:50 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Somewhere in US
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aauummm
The difference between the 22K chassis Kelderman front spring and the 22K chassis OEM spring is that the Kelderman spring has 7 leaves that are of varying length and each leaf is thinner than each leaf of the OEM spring.
This gives a progressive rate spring but has the same total load capacity as the OEM. The OEM spring has 2 leaves that are full length, thicker, carry the full load, and are very stiff.
The Kelderman design is a combination of the new progressive rate springs, air bags and softer shocks.
Top picture is Kelderman, the second is OEM.
|
Thanks for the comparison...
There have been many conversations about this, but it helps a lot to look at apples to apples comparison data.
According to Kelderman, the leaf springs they use have a spring capacity of 4400lbs (2200 each spring).
__________________
Always Tinker
|
|
|
08-07-2018, 07:55 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Somewhere in US
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyderRV
|
I studied those...at 3500lbs each spring...this would be OEM stock. No change here.
I'm not sure about your rig, but my OEM spring capacity is 7000lbs (3500 each spring) as per Ford cutaway chassis specs.
Check out the factory Class A brochure from Ford:
https://www.fleet.ford.com/resources...2018_ARLSD.pdf
__________________
Always Tinker
|
|
|
08-07-2018, 08:45 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvfigs
If we add SUMO springs...then we have essentially what Kelderman has...
This idea surfaced in the past by other members. The difficult part was tracking down an actual leaf spring that would fit.
As per Kelderman, the leaf springs they use have a spring capacity of 4400 (2200 each spring).
SUMO springs for the F53 18K chassis have a spring capacity of 2600lbs...I'm not sure if this is combined...
|
I am not sure if I am understanding what you are stating. If you add sumo springs to the stock leaf springs in front it will be very firm. If you are saying what I think you might be, that is finding softer, lower rate leaf springs and then supplementing them with Sumo Springs you would be approaching the suspension in a similar fashion as Kelderman. New soft multi leaf, leaf springs and Sumo Springs will get you into a similar cost situation with the hope that it will work, and without the same compliant dampening as an air bag like Kelderman uses and without the ability to adjust for correct ride height or changing load.
__________________
2006 Winnebago Sightseer 29r Special Edition. Michelin Tires, Koni FSD shocks. Recently installed Kelderman dual stage Air Suspension front and rear.
|
|
|
08-08-2018, 12:44 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: TEJAS
Posts: 814
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvfigs
I studied those...at 3500lbs each spring...this would be OEM stock. No change here.
I'm not sure about your rig, but my OEM spring capacity is 7000lbs (3500 each spring) as per Ford cutaway chassis specs.
Check out the factory Class A brochure from Ford:
https://www.fleet.ford.com/resources...2018_ARLSD.pdf
|
Yes but there are 6 leafs in this one for a more progressive stiffness on compression versus my current two thick leafs!?
|
|
|
08-08-2018, 05:46 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Somewhere in US
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Campering
I am not sure if I am understanding what you are stating. If you add sumo springs to the stock leaf springs in front it will be very firm. If you are saying what I think you might be, that is finding softer, lower rate leaf springs and then supplementing them with Sumo Springs you would be approaching the suspension in a similar fashion as Kelderman. New soft multi leaf, leaf springs and Sumo Springs will get you into a similar cost situation with the hope that it will work, and without the same compliant dampening as an air bag like Kelderman uses and without the ability to adjust for correct ride height or changing load.
|
I think the firmness of the SUMO springs depends on the durometer (stiffness). The blue SUMOs are "softer" than the yellow SUMOs.
Yes, I'm trying to see if a "poor mans" version of Kelderman can work.
If we can figure this out and make it work, then we can help a lot of folks who are looking to improve the comfort of their rigs without spending a fortune
__________________
Always Tinker
|
|
|
08-08-2018, 05:52 AM
|
#11
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Somewhere in US
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyderRV
Yes but there are 6 leafs in this one for a more progressive stiffness on compression versus my current two thick leafs!?
|
Honestly, this is the part that I don't understand...
Kelderman uses more leafs and less spring capacity?
So, if we want the leaf springs to be softer we need to look at both spring rate and spring capacity?
Am I understanding this correctly?
https://www.eatondetroitspring.com/s...-vs-load-rate/
__________________
Always Tinker
|
|
|
08-08-2018, 06:59 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Altoona, Iowa
Posts: 1,668
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvfigs
Honestly, this is the part that I don't understand...
Kelderman uses more leafs and less spring capacity?
So, if we want the leaf springs to be softer we need to look at both spring rate and spring capacity?
Am I understanding this correctly?
https://www.eatondetroitspring.com/s...-vs-load-rate/
|
I don't believe that Kelderman would use a spring with less design capacity than OEM. The liability implications would be massive. What if an airbag goes flat (it happened to me once). Then the springs would have to carry most of the OEM design load, which on my unit would be 8000 lb.
As I see it, the softer ride comes from the progressive rate spring that Kelderman uses and not from a reduced spring capacity. I would have to confirm that with Kelderman.
__________________
2010 Itasca Sunova 33C, (lots of upgrades and modifications)
2011 Honda CRV, 2004 Rubicon (many modifications)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
|
|
08-08-2018, 07:20 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Forest River Owners Club Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Western NY
Posts: 164
|
We added the Sumo springs to our unit after the first long trip. The difference was night and day. I don't think the main springs are to stiff if the coach is loaded properly. To me it felt like the axle was hitting the bump stop. The Sumo springs helped to cushion that movement.
|
|
|
08-08-2018, 09:15 AM
|
#14
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Somewhere in US
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aauummm
I don't believe that Kelderman would use a spring with less design capacity than OEM. The liability implications would be massive. What if an airbag goes flat (it happened to me once). Then the springs would have to carry most of the OEM design load, which on my unit would be 8000 lb.
As I see it, the softer ride comes from the progressive rate spring that Kelderman uses and not from a reduced spring capacity. I would have to confirm that with Kelderman.
|
This makes sense to me as well.
The kid I spoke with on the phone a few days ago said: "We cut spring capacity in half...yeah...about 4400lb spring capacity."
I can only assume the following: (a) the kid is correct because he is selling the product (b) the kid is incorrect and doesn't know the product (c) the kid made up some random number to get me off the phone after a long day of work
He also said: "This is why we call it a two stage system because the air bags make up the rest of the capacity..."
Or...perhaps I didn't ask the right questions:
What is the your spring capacity?
What is your spring rate?
Hopefully we can get more folks to search for real specs on the Kelderman leaf springs
__________________
Always Tinker
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|