Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > THE CHASSIS CLUB FORUMS > Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-18-2015, 06:26 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lowell, Arkansas
Posts: 7,301
A lot of information and a lot of choices. The biggest IMHO issue is the fact that our coaches are so different. I've listed many of those differences before: length, weight distribution, tires, tire pressures, coach builders choices of storage locations for water (fresh and waste) and stuff, over hang etc, etc. Because of the many variables results with all changes/improvements will vary.

I think it's wise to always do one change at a time then evaluate the results. Also, (again IMHO) each item or thing changed will give some improvement. Try to assign a percentage like 10% or 20%. That's very subjective but that's OK. It's your perspective and opinion of the change that is important.

Do the easy/cheap ones first, like tire pressures, the CHF if your SB (Stabilizer Bars) front and rear have the two holes. I will also add this. The CHF, as reported by many, many individuals, has given the biggest improvement in R/H by far over any other change. Some have reported less dramatic changes with the CHF again based on the variables of their coaches but it was still an improvement.

Changing the SB bushing from the stock rubber to poly has also shown to make a big difference. That's based on the fact that the poly bushings are much better than rubber and often the owners current bushings were either real bad or almost gone. That's a cheap fix as well.

Having the alignment angle of CASTER set at its upper limit will help a bunch to improve straight ahead tracking.

One person may change shocks and see a big improvement in R/H (ride & handling) and another will see little.

Also, and this is important, keep in mind that R/H is a combined result of ALL suspension components; springs, shocks, TB's SB's, bushings, steering stabilizers, steer safe, safe T steer etc, etc. Everything works together. The SB's control roll/sway from bumps, dips, entering and leaving service areas, winds (strong, steady and gusts) and approaching semi's. The shocks control spring compression/rebound which is exactly what is happening when all items listed above work to move your coach.

The road (2-lane) we travel to and from town (10 miles) has some sharp turns. Some are close to 90 degrees. I've driven it thousands and thousands of times over the last 30 years. I've driven school buses (25 years), 3- MH's, cars, trucks and three TT's. With this WBGO I can and often try to drive some of those curves at a higher than normal rate of speed just as a test. The MH does not lean at all.

TeJay
__________________
TeJay Auto Instructor/4-yrs USAF/ Liz: RN/ WBGO 2014 Vista 30T/ F-53/CHF/5-Star/Koni * Bella & Izzy * Golden /Cocker mix/ Louie The Cat* All Retired
TeJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 07-18-2015, 03:09 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
John USA's Avatar
 
Rexhall Owners Group
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: East of Tacoma, WA
Posts: 368
Blog Entries: 18
Related question on the CHF...

I thought I read (somewhere) that it's only applicable after a certain year, eg, 1999, or 2000...can't recall exactly which year it was or where I read it.

Can anyone verify?

Sorry for the hijack...
__________________
1996 Rexhall xl3400
Ford 460
Tag axle
John USA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2015, 05:29 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
vsheetz's Avatar


 
Fleetwood Owners Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 15,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by John USA View Post
Related question on the CHF...



I thought I read (somewhere) that it's only applicable after a certain year, eg, 1999, or 2000...can't recall exactly which year it was or where I read it.



Can anyone verify?



Sorry for the hijack...

Check to see if you have an empty set of holes. If yes, it's applicable. Was on my 2001 chassis with 2002 house.
__________________
Vince and Susan
2011 Tiffin Phaeton 40QTH (Cummins ISC/Freightliner)
Flat towing a modified 2005 Jeep (Rubicon Wrangler)
Previously a 2002 Fleetwood Pace Arrow 37A and a 1995 Safari Trek 2830.
vsheetz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2015, 07:03 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lowell, Arkansas
Posts: 7,301
I think it went like this. Ford did not have an f-53 chassis in 1997 or 98 I don't know which. When ever the next chassis came out in either 98 or 99 that was the first chassis with two holes. We had a 1999 but at that time I didn't even try to determine if we had a 1998 or a 1999 chassis. From that point on the F-53 had two holes in the SB's.
I have read that some 2015's don't but don't hold me to that.

TeJay
__________________
TeJay Auto Instructor/4-yrs USAF/ Liz: RN/ WBGO 2014 Vista 30T/ F-53/CHF/5-Star/Koni * Bella & Izzy * Golden /Cocker mix/ Louie The Cat* All Retired
TeJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2015, 01:44 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lowell, Arkansas
Posts: 7,301
I did some research and the first F-53 chassis for RV's was produced in 1999. So they must have skipped the 1998 model year. We had a 1999 DS so it must have had a 1999 chassis as well.

TeJay
__________________
TeJay Auto Instructor/4-yrs USAF/ Liz: RN/ WBGO 2014 Vista 30T/ F-53/CHF/5-Star/Koni * Bella & Izzy * Golden /Cocker mix/ Louie The Cat* All Retired
TeJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
f53



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford F53 1999 alternator cbilodeau Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum 35 01-18-2016 08:15 PM
Update on 97 Ford F53 V8 460 Upper/Lower Radiator Hoses 98FPA Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum 7 05-23-2015 10:02 AM
1995 F53 Fan Clutch - defective Ford parts? Adventurer1 Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum 5 11-20-2014 07:19 AM
Class IV Hitch on F53...tongue weight 700lbs. camaraderie Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum 10 06-20-2014 06:04 AM
F53 & Workhorse Chassis Wiper controller issue 94-Newmar Tiffin Owner's Forum 2 11-14-2013 07:21 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.