 |
|
10-25-2009, 06:12 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 626
|
What do you folks think that is a better diesel cat or cummings as far as performance and maintnence reliability and fuel economy, what do you sugest? Thank you all.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
10-25-2009, 06:20 PM
|
#2
|
|
Community Administrator
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 13,895
|
I prefer and have a Cummins, however a Cat would not be a deal breaker if I liked the motorhome.
It's soon to be a moot point as Cat will no longer make on-road engines in 2010.
__________________
Adios, Dirk - '84 Real Lite Truck Camper, '86 Wilderness Cimarron TT, '07 DSDP, '11 Virtual RV

|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-25-2009, 06:20 PM
|
#3
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Texas Boomers Club
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cypress, Texas USA
Posts: 6,626
|
If you're talking about a new motorhome, Caterpillar will soon be a non-starter. Caterpillar has elected to leave the over-the-road diesel business - IOW, they will no longer be supplying diesels for trucks, motorhomes, etc. Future service may, therefore, become a consideration years down the road as the Cat OTR service facilities begin to disappear.
As far as used or new motorhomes sitting on a dealer's lot, choosing between Cat and Cummins (no "g" in Cummins) is like choosing between, let's say, Ford or Chevy. Each have their supporters and detractors. In general, though, I wouldn't let the make of engine installed in a particular rig determine whether or not I would consider it.
Rusty
__________________
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-25-2009, 07:23 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wet Coast of Canada
Posts: 307
|
There's not a whole lot of difference between Cat And Cummins! If You like the coach buy it regardless of which Engine provides the power,
__________________
Rob
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-25-2009, 07:44 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 134
|
I agree with everyone else they are both very good engines. I have a Cummins in mine but I still would have bought it if it would have had a Cat in it. If you maintain both of them they are million mile engines. I own five diesels, 1 Cat, 2 Kubotas, and 2 Cummins. I like my diesels. I wish the wife's Tahoe was Diesel.
Chris
__________________
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-26-2009, 07:08 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fulltime Various
Posts: 1,730
|
Hi ALL:
Our rig is powered by a Cummins and is great, however, both Cat and Cummins have good reps., and, I always liked the Cat advertising gimmick......"If it ain't a CAT, it's a DOG!!!" Isn't true ofcourse, but kinda catchy  Steve
__________________
08 EX 4502/500 Cummins/Spartan/05 Honda Element
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-26-2009, 08:33 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Punta Gorda, Fl.
Posts: 580
|
If I had to choose between two otherwise identical MH's, the one with the highest torque would get my vote.
Tom
__________________
Tom, Pat and Buster (the Boston terrier)
2004 DSDP 3807, 370HP Spartan
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-26-2009, 01:55 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 626
|
thank you verry much to you guys, I was told that cat engines burn a little bit more fuel then cummings, I never woned anything diesel so I dont know much, how is it going to be to get parts in the future for the cat engines?
__________________
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-26-2009, 02:18 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Fleetwood Owners Club
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury,North Carolina
Posts: 230
|
Ninos,
There will not be a problem with parts for Cat engines. They will still be in off road equipment (dump trucks, loaders, etc) They just elected to not spend the money to keep up with EPA requirements, which will continue to change. You will can go to any Cat dealer with a engine service center and get your Cat engine worked on, they even have RV service centers.
The real question would be if the coach has the floor plan, room, appointments, etc that you like. The Cat, Cummins, or Detroit engines will provide you with plenty of miles if you take care of them. MPG depends on length/weight of coach and the way you drive. 8-10mpg is average. The thing you want is torque, more the merrier.
If I looked at 2 coaches that were the same, one had 370 hp/ 900lbft tq, the other 370 hp/ 1000lbft tq. The 1000 would win no matter who made the engine.
Richard
__________________
2006 Revolution 40L, 400HP Cat C9, Allison 6 speed, Spartan Chassis, Aero-Turbine Muffler
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-26-2009, 11:02 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Tiffin Owners Club Freightliner Owners Club
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 3,549
|
My CAT C7 purrs better at 29,000 miles than when brand new. No problems, no hiccups, and no recalls in the 3 1/2 years I've owned it. I wish I had the life expectancy that my CAT does. That said, I didn't buy coach for the brand of engine. Had it come with a Cummins, I would have bought it without any hesitation.
__________________
Travel well, travel safe,
Jim & BJ
2006 Tiffin Phaeton-2009 GMC Sierra CC 4X4
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-27-2009, 07:10 PM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Solon, Ohio USA
Posts: 374
|
According to some Freightliner guys that I talked to, CAT made the decision to get out of the highway engines partially because of the emission controls in 2007. The Cummins uses a simpler, less expensive system than the CAT required. They also said that the Cummins gets a little better fuel mileage than the CAT. In a new motorhome, its a moot point.
I have a 350 Hp CAT in my Journey, and I love it. Like the others, I wouldn't have bought the Journey based on the engine. We love the coach.
Enjoy your diesel - no matter which coach you get.
__________________
2006 Winnebago Journey, Model 39K, 2008 Jeep Liberty, M & G Toad Braking System
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-29-2009, 10:21 AM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 969
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninos
What do you folks think that is a better diesel cat or cummings as far as performance and maintnence reliability and fuel economy, what do you sugest? Thank you all.
|
I also have a Cummins but a CAT would be OK also. They are both great engines. Looks like everyone agrees, flip a coin.
Good luck,
__________________
Del & Lori & Millie, (our miniature Aussie) 2007 Diplomat 40PDQ - 2009 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon, US Gear Unified Tow Brake.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-29-2009, 11:28 AM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Fleetwood Owners Club
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 953
|
- CAT has more torque and hp but at a mpg cost while Cummins has a slightly lower torque and hp but provides the steady output with better mpg.
- CAT does better off the start but Cummins does better after your up to cruising speed.
- CAT is out of the RV business since they decided not to go with the latest gov emissions standards. Cummins will be the engine of choice.
- CAT repair facilities and small garages for out-of-the-way repair are more difficult to find than Cummins which are thousands.
- CAT's are more expensive from the start
__________________
Fleetwood Providence 2008 40e
Ford F-350 4x4 Diesel 6.0L 2006
Honda CR-V 2006
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10-29-2009, 06:47 PM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne & Marathon, Florida
Posts: 1,535
|
As I understand it, Cats will still be sold, but as a Navistar Engine. Navistar is responsible for the emissions parts.
__________________
2005 Safari Cheetah 38PDQ - 2009 Ford Flex
Me (Gatogonow), The Boss (DW), Honey Bunny(The Gato)!
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|

»
Recent Discussions

»
Upcoming Rallies
No events scheduled in the next 365 days.
|
»
iRV2 on facebook
|