Go Back   iRV2 Forums > MOTORHOME FORUMS > Class A Motorhome Discussions
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-09-2012, 01:00 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Gulf Coast of Alabama
Posts: 505
Does a higher HP diesel engine have a better mpg ratio

Ag a 400 HP 40 footer will it get better mpg than say a 350 HP?
Thank Tom

"searching for the best full-time rig"
__________________

__________________
Tom222 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-09-2012, 01:13 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Mr_D's Avatar
 
Solo Rvers Club
iRV2 No Limits Club
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 28,477
Depends mostly on the driver. Testing by truck companies show as much as 30% difference between the best and worst drives even after changing rigs.
__________________

__________________
2009 45' Magna 630 w/Cummins ISX 650 HP/1950 Lbs Ft
Charter Good Sam Lifetime Member, FMCA, SKP
RV'ing since 1957, NRA Benefactor Life, towing '14 CR-V
Mr_D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 05:45 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Vintage RV Owners Club
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 671
It takes the same amount of HP to move the coach down the road no matter how big the engine, having said that a higher HP engine doesn't have to work as hard to get to speed and maintain that speed then a lower HP engine. As D said a lot depends on the driver.
__________________
92' Holiday Rambler 1000
The wife, me and two furry kids
If you have it, a truck brought it.
blackf3504dr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 06:00 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Chaffeekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chaffee, MO.
Posts: 397
More ponies = more hay

Happy Trails
Jim
__________________
MGySgt USMC(R) 1961-1991
2001 Fleetwood Expedition
2013 Jeep Wrangler Sierra Toad
Chaffeekid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 06:16 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
BCooke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,523
While not totally the same the principles are.
We had both a super charged Grand Prix v6 and a gas friendly Pontiac Vibe 4 banger. Going to Long Island I actually use to get 3-4 MPG better in the Grand Prix (if I drove them both the same).
Keeping the transmission from hunting for gears and the rpms down helps. Sometimes that extra HP/torque gives you just enough to keep everything efficient.
Summary:
If you drove them exactly the same probably so, of course like the Grand Prix on local driving, the first time you put the pedal to the metal you just blew your MPG savings.
__________________
2017 F350 Lariat Diesel Dually, White, Hitch Kit.
2013 Dutchman Voltage 3200 Epic II 5th wheel.
BCooke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 07:27 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
SeattlePirat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bainbridge Island, Wa
Posts: 453
I dont believe that a high hp engine will out perform a lower hp engine in fuel economy if all things are equal except the hp. If that were true, every one would be buying the same engine for a 34 footer as with a 43 footer. Right?

A diesel needs only two things to run, air and FUEL.
__________________
SeattlePirat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 09:47 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
edgray's Avatar


 
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Entegra Owners Club
Spartan Chassis
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Madison, MS
Posts: 7,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattlePirat View Post
...........A diesel needs only two things to run, air and FUEL.
Make that "some" diesels.

Most modern diesels won't run on JUST air and fuel, they also need a computer and lets don't even start talking about all the downstream stuff.
__________________
2016 EC Aspire 42RBQ / 2014 CR-V
edgray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 10:58 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
1ciderdog's Avatar


 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,325
Years ago my buddy and I both had the same year Ford pick ups - his had the 460 engine and mine had the 390 engine. We had the same size cab over campers and we traveled together to go camping in the mountains. His 460 always got better mpg than the smaller 390 on those trips. Maybe it was just the efficiency of the those particular engines but my thought was the larger engine did not have to work as hard as the smaller one. I had the pedal to the metal when he only used 3/4 pedal going up some of those mountains. I know this thread is about diesels so am only putting this in as a theory that the larger HP engine may not have to work as hard and therefore get better mileage depending on vehicle weights, terrain, and other conditions.
Bob
__________________
Bob, Sandi & Marmaduke the Big Pug
SW OREGON 2004 Journey 39K, 330 Cat
If towing: a 2006 Mini Cooper or 1995 Wrangler
1ciderdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 01:15 PM   #9
Member
 
Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 60
Does a higher HP diesel engine

I had a 1999 HR with the 275 cummins and kept track via spread sheet of every drop of fuel over 127,000 miles towing and overall average was 10.347 mpg. When considering a change of motorhomes I contacted Cummins that the new unit with a 400 cummins would be about 4,000 lbs more overall. They suggested it would run around 9.0 mpg. Well after 19,000 miles we are averaging 7.58 mpg.
I then contacted Cummins shops as well as Cummins and then gave the response that as they reduce emissions since 1999 that there will also be a reduction in Mpg. I fail to understand burn more fuel and reduce emissions but I do not have a degree in science only common sense.
I finally came to the conclusion that as fuel price increase's and HP increases the overall mileage is reduced. But I will not give up the lifestyle till we are out of $$$
__________________
gnrenfeld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 02:07 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Smitty77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Over the next hill, around the next curve...
Posts: 3,309
As others have pointed out, so many factors in this...

And, one key thing to remember is that the 'same' RV with say mid block vs big block engine - will not be the same 'exact' RV. The Big Blocks, lets just talk Cummins in this example. Compare a ISL (as I have) with an ISM. The bigger blocks weight more, and require more cooling so more weight, requires bigger trans with the Allison 4000 so more weight, and usually heavier duty running gears for the differential and axle shaft so more weight.

So this means the same RV with mid size vs Big Block - are not the same RV.

All that being said, it comes down to power to weight ratios, and you can find that the mid block actually has more power to weight ratio then the Big Block, in the identical rigs. (Country Coach Intrigues, can be found with the ISL400 or the Big Block Cats, as one example.)

So, if driven the same way by the driver, it is very possible for the bigger engine rig to get better MPG then the mid size engine. It is a case by case analysis.

In general, IMO, if available - go with the biggest engine you can get in the rig. As it is more then just MPG, it is also a safety feature to have reserve power capacity for acceleration needs. And remember most Big Blocks, will have more compression to aid in braking, many times with a three stage Jake vs a mid size engine's two stage Jake Compression, and or exhaust brake in some units.

So, suppose the answer is - it depends!

Best to all, be safe, have fun,
Smitty
__________________
Roo II is our 04 Country Coach Allure 40'
OnDRoad for The JRNY! Enjoy life...
Smitty77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 02:10 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
distaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,191
See attached. How you drive is key to mileage.

http://www.catrvclub.org/PDF_Docs/Un...nding_Perf.pdf
__________________
Paul
2006 Patriot Thunder C13 Allison 4000
2010 Ford Flex Ecoboost AWD
distaff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 02:22 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
greystroke's Avatar


 
Monaco Owners Club
Freightliner Owners Club
Holiday Rambler Owners Club
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Spring Hill, Florida
Posts: 1,150
6 speed tranny helps and a light foot.
__________________
98 Endeavor DP, ISB275
RX300, Falcon II hitch, BB Vantage Select
VMSpc, 2002 Grey Ford Powerstroke
TST 507 w/ 10 Sensors
greystroke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 06:51 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Cat320's Avatar
 
Fleetwood Owners Club
American Coach Owners Club
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattlePirat View Post
...A diesel needs only two things to run, air and FUEL....
You forgot one...MONEY!
__________________
2014 American Eagle 45T
DD 500
Pulling a Honda CRV
Cat320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 05:17 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
distaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ciderdog View Post
...his had the 460 engine and mine had the 390 engine.
Bob
Worth noting that the 390 was an FE engine, the design of this family began in 1957, and it had a peculiar design were the push rods essentially pass through the intake manifold. The 460 is of the 385 family of engines designed in the late 60's with better breathing characteristics. Of the FE family only the 427 Single Overhead Cam (SOHC) didn't have that problem because the Ford engineers eliminated the push rods with an overhead cam design.

Really hard to make a generalization about fuel economy and power when comparing to such different architectures.
__________________

__________________
Paul
2006 Patriot Thunder C13 Allison 4000
2010 Ford Flex Ecoboost AWD
distaff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.