|
|
05-17-2012, 04:45 PM
|
#29
|
Senior Member
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Angola State Prison - Murder
Posts: 4,230
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by C-Leigh Racing
How are you guys getting 295 HP out of a 275 HP engine.
|
I make DW push. Although after our trip back from Fl, I thinks she's down to about 10hp.
Actually my 295 was a brain fart. Probably power of suggestion for the rest.
__________________
John & Clare Lyon
2007 43.5' Monaco Dynasty Palace III (All Electric)
Towd: 2011 Chevy Equinox
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
05-17-2012, 06:12 PM
|
#30
|
Senior Member
Entegra Owners Club
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Midland, Texas
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by toneumanns
Don't know how you got 5500 rpm. The rev limiter on that engine is set at 4800 rpm.
|
Not the new ones, it'll go just over 5500.
__________________
Terry & Gloria O, Midland, Texas
2020 Entegra Aspire 44W, 2022 F250 King Ranch
2012 Entegra Aspire 42RBQ Traded
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 09:24 PM
|
#31
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by toneumanns
Don't know how you got 5500 rpm. The rev limiter on that engine is set at 4800 rpm.
|
DOOH!! Geese Marge why didnt you tell me that before I put my foot in my mouth
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 09:26 PM
|
#32
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 14
|
On there everyday looking..
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 09:27 PM
|
#33
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TerryO
Not the new ones, it'll go just over 5500.
|
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 09:32 PM
|
#34
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 14
|
A few mixed replys on the power..
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 09:51 PM
|
#35
|
Senior Member
National RV Owners Club Nor'easters Club Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 778
|
Last year we purchased our first motorhome, a new to us 2005 32' National RV built on a Ford F53 V10 chassis. We've now logged nearly 6,000 miles from as far north as NH, west as Niagara Falls, and South as Virginia, with all but a couple of hundred of them pulling our 2010 VW Tiguan on a flatbed trailer. With the car and the trailer, we're just under 5,000 lbs being towed.
In most cases when we're traveling on the highways we can stay out of the slow vehicle lane and keep up to a modest 55/60 MPH. On some of the more severe, or longer duration grades we do have to use the slow lane and at worst, have slowed down to about 42 MPH. This was on a climb through the mountains on our way to Lake George, NY.
Would I like more power ... heck yeah - who wouldn't, but from an "everyday" usage standpoint, I feel that our V10 F53 chassis more than delivers on what I give it.
__________________
2005 National Sea Breeze 1311
2015 VW Tiguan SE 4Motion (trailered)
Follow us online https://OurRVJourney.com
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 10:47 PM
|
#36
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 79
|
I have a 99 35' w/v-10 pull a 28' enclosed trailer with sand rail and rhino and 2 kids quads was a dog till i installed the 5 star tunner.now it runs much better.i go from az to Idaho 2000 mile round trip up and doun hills no problem. Did that trip 3 years and went to Alabama and back.3500 miles round trip.still runs great.yes i will get another DP 1 of these days but this works for now
|
|
|
05-18-2012, 03:34 PM
|
#37
|
Senior Member
Outdoors RV Owners Club
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mid West
Posts: 167
|
I'm pulling a Jeep Wrangler behind mine with no problems. I can hardly tell its back there and I have the older V10. It certainly isn't a dog.
Be aware of the spark plug issues with both old and new motor. The heads are aluminum and this can result in issues deriving from something as simple as changing spark plugs. The older engines have four threads per plug. Improper torquing will weaken or strip the threads and you'll be blowing plugs right out of the engine. The newer engines have a two-piece plug that can break in half when you try to remove them, leaving the lower half in the head.
I was aware of this issue before I bought the coach, but with proper knowledge the issue can be mitigated. I wouldn't hesitate to buy another V10 powered vehicle. Its been an impressive power plant.
Keith
__________________
No More Class A. Now a Tagalong.
|
|
|
05-18-2012, 05:22 PM
|
#38
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 315
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by C-Leigh Racing
How are you guys getting 295 HP out of a 275 HP engine.
F53 chassis from 98 to 2000 had 275 hp, 2001 to 2007 310 & over that 362 HP.
Now the 6.8 V10 like in pickups, vans & suvs, had a lower hp rating, 210 for the pickups so I guess it would seem underpowered.
I can tell you like this, I have a 98 F53 chassis, 99 M/H with 275 hp 6.8 V10, 4R100 4 speed, & every time it pulls out of the driveway it is grossing at least 25,600 with 24' enclosed behind & I am NOT crying about HP or climbing a hill.
I live in the east & any way I travel I got to cross a mountain to get to where I'm going.
Would I like more HP, of course I would, who wouldnt, but I know its a M/H & not a race car or one of them BIG hp/torque logging trucks like up in Canada.
Far as I know, nothings been done to or added to this engine, except a few weeks ago I added an extra trans oil cooler, trans temp gauge & return inline filter for the fluid.
Now I did check out the hitch & frame real good, before we bought it & several times afterwards to be sure it was up to the task of pulling that 24' 5500 lb enclosed & not seen a problem yet.
Neil
|
- Horsepower and Torque
- In 2000, the Ford V-10 had a 6.8 L engine with 310 horsepower at 4,250 rpm, powerful enough to tow large amounts. It also had a maximum torque of 425 foot-pounds at 3,450 rpm and two valves per cylinder, with a single overhead camshaft configuration
Read more: 2000 Ford V-10 Specs | eHow.com 2000 Ford V-10 Specs | eHow.com
__________________
Nathan and Linda, 2000 Winnebago Chieftain 35U, F53 Chassis, Banks Power Pack
|
|
|
05-18-2012, 05:44 PM
|
#39
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Daphne,Al
Posts: 192
|
I've had both engines, one in a 2005 Fleetwood Fiesta and the newer engine in current Mh is a 2009 Southwind, 3 valve, with the 5 speed xmission. My experience is daylight and dark with the newer engine performance being much better than the older version. I never had a problem with the 05 model but at the same speed (62mph) and the 09 being a heavier coach, the rpms and fuel consumption are less. The 05 V-10 on the 32S got 6.6-7.0 mpg pulling an 06 Accura TI on a car dolly. The transmission was constantly downshifting and running up to 33-3600rpms at the slightest hill. The 09 Southwind on the same chasis is getting 9-9.2 pulling the same load. The difference in Rpms is about 400 less on the new model V-10 at the same speed as the 05 model. Handles hills much better with no deafening down shift and high rpms. I am really impressed with the newer version of the V-10 but certainly not discounting the performance of the old version. Both in my opinion are excellent engines. Having said all of this I've found a vast difference in HP and performance.
__________________
2006 Itasca Suncruiser 38T
Traveling with Westies, Max, Ellie and new addition Sophie.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|