Go Back   iRV2 Forums > MOTORHOME FORUMS > Class A Motorhome Discussions
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-20-2011, 02:46 PM   #29
AB7OH's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mead, Wa
Posts: 50
I use SeaFoam in all my gas engines as a fuel stabilizer for winter storage and then come spring there is no moister in the tank and the system is clean and good to go.

Richard & Roxanne
2000 Airstream Land Yacht XL 390
AB7OH is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 02-20-2011, 05:09 PM   #30
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 251
Well guess Mike C. would find me a real idiot. As I claim to get 1.5MPG improvement with the Stanadyne. Either that or I am simply ignorant of all the possible parameters effecting fuel mileage.
All I know is that I have repeatability. That is I repeatedly get that increase when using the additive and repeatedly loose the increase when I don't use the additive. I do have 94300 miles on my F550, so I am probably well beyond break-in. I am aware of the effect of speed and wind, which is why I have checked the MPG when holding my speed to 60, 65 and 70 MPH. This across the same terrain within a time frame of two weeks in one recent case and three weeks during another recent test. Of course I was not equipped to measure barometric pressure, air temperature under the hood nor most certainly air density. But still with additive I see an increase of 1.5MPG over not using the additive. Though the mileage improvement was not my reason for beginning to use nor continuing to use the additive. Is is most certainly a side benefit.
As to how the additive improves mileage, all I know is that it says it increases the 'Cetane' of fuel. I have no way to prove or disprove this claim. As for the major trucking companies not using such an additive there is for one the fact that their mileage is low enough to begin with that any improvement might prove to be negligible. I am going from 13 to 14.5 which while roughly 10% and worthwhile even at 3.5 - 4.5 MPG, don't know as it would have the same effective percentage increase. The major trucking companies are of course running the larger Cummings, cat, IH and Detroit diesel, I am running a 7.3L V8 Powerstroke and have no idea what if any difference that might contribute to the numerous other factors even assuming for the moment the additive does in fact increase the cetane. Would a small increase in cetane have the same impact on in line six versus a V8, etc? Don't know. Don't care. Know the results I consistently get. Know that when I stop using the additive the MPG goes down. Start using the additive again and MPG goes up. I hand calculate for each tank. Kept a spreadsheet for sometime, unfortunately lost the spreadsheet when changing to a new computer. So now have begun a new one but only have three fill ups currently logged.
Now the really funny thing, is I am usually on the side of Mike C. in these discussions and for the most part still am. I believe they are mostly if not all marketing hype and of little to no real value. Like I said I started to use the Stanadyne because it was recommended by a well respected and experienced diesel mechanic (actually owned the shop). Taking his recommendation and the fact it is the only additive I know of both recommended and sold by Ford.
As an aside one of the reasons I was checking the mileage at different speeds to reestablish the MPG difference at various speeds, primarily 65 versus 70MPH. In my case the F550 with RV hauler bed but not loaded or towing with two passengers was 2MPG. Ok, actually 1.8 to 2.1.

jablair is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lucas Fuel Treatment Digital Boy Cummins Engines 21 06-29-2009 06:55 AM
Best-Selling Cruiser leads CrossRoads RV's growth spurt DriVer RV Industry Press 1 10-16-2006 05:55 AM
CrossRoads RV Credits Explosive Growth To Meeting Customer Needs w/ Quality Products DriVer RV Industry Press 1 09-27-2006 01:50 PM
Lucas Fuet Treatment Digital Boy MH-General Discussions & Problems 1 09-14-2006 11:06 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.