Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > MOTORHOME FORUMS > Class A Motorhome Discussions
Click Here to Login
Register FilesVendors Registry Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-16-2018, 09:38 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,052
Does anyone even bother to read the OP's question or do you just read the words "gas" and "diesel" and launch into your rhetoric??????

Come one guys - go have your diesel V gas pissing match on the other thread.
mtofell is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 07-16-2018, 10:22 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
gnlandrus's Avatar
 
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 464
In the early 70s, FMC made a rear engine gas motor home, the FMC 2900R. It had a Dodge, industrial 440. It was, for the time, a very expensive and prestigious motor home. Quite a few celebs owned them. Here is a link that shows what they were and some other interesting information.

https://bangshift.com/bangshiftxl/ba...-in-the-1970s/
My parents owned one, I owned one in 1981, and my brother actually bought one that James Brolin had owned. Only 29’ long but drove like a dream..
__________________
Greg & Marsha
2008 Monaco Camelot 42PDQ
2023 Bronco 4 door Wildtrak Toad, 2016 Cadillac SRX.
gnlandrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2018, 10:37 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
UFO Pilot's Avatar
 
Winnebago Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 6,401
A company named PSI took the 8.1 platform and made it an 8.8. They are using it in buses I believe. There was hope that the "new" Workhorse owners would use the motor and reintroduce the UFO Chassis.

It was speculated that Ford wants the entire gas chassis market and are willing to do all they can to keep the competition out of the market.
__________________
Wayne & Roberta

08 Winnebago Destination 39W Gas UFO Workhorse Chassis......It's really weird being the same age as old people. I thought getting old would take much longer.
UFO Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2018, 11:34 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
Snufy1's Avatar
 
Vintage RV Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Auburn CA
Posts: 239
I have a 1983 Revcon FWD. I love it handles great 10 to 12 mph
Revcon was made from 1965 or so until 1990 they were expensive list price for mine was $ 143k
__________________
Tom & Michele Smith
RVM151
1983 Revcon King33
Snufy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 12:09 AM   #33
Senior Member
 
Superburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: GrandJunction, Co
Posts: 546
Look what the pickup truck makers are doing in the 1/2 ton market. Under 3 liter engine, twin turbos, and tow ratings never imagined in a 1/2 ton 10 years ago. And getting 15 plus MPG towing. Wait until that technology get applied to the motorhome/ school bus market, and it may give diesels a run for their money.
__________________
84 Country Coach Cummins Cruiser, 6BTA5.9, GV Overdrive, Exhaust brake.
Superburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 03:03 AM   #34
Member
 
Charles27909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO Pilot View Post
And some of us just don't want diesel vehicles. The only thing missing (for me) on my UFO gasser is air ride.
That's just a matter of $$$$. I have looked into the same. The only benefit I see in a diesel pusher is an air system to operate heavier braking systems and operate a very smooth riding suspension. I come from the trucking world. I don't need to run with air brakes. I get plenty of that already. However, a smooth riding suspension I will not compromise. To me, that's one of the allure of a big motorhome. In fact, I will argue one of the smoothest riding coaches around doesn't even have air ride, a Silver Eagle bus. BTW, I love old buses and bus conversions. But before I get too off track....it is totally do-able to rip out the factory mechanical spring suspension and install a full air ride suspension. Complete with air compressor and all. It is a big install, probably best done by a professional unless you are personally good at that stuff. Sadly, I don't have the patience....lol....or rather sizable tooling.
Charles27909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 03:14 AM   #35
Member
 
Charles27909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by nothermark View Post
All that could be done with a turbo'd gas engine. Horsepower is horsepower. The rest is gearing. The only reason there is the constant mantra of gas vs diesel is that there are no large block properly equipped gasoline engines thanks to the EPA and various marketing forces. Few RV's are run enough miles to make diesel longevity a big deal. OTOH most heavy trucks are so they do benefit. That translates to the only heavy chassis available any more are diesel. That, in turn, makes the whole argument pointless.
Torque is what gets you to the top. We had a saying regarding big block CATs..."The world is flat with a 600 CAT!!" That being said, gearing is important. You can draw alot of power from a gas engine (turbo-ed or not) with the right rear end get and wheel/tire setup. However, there always seems to many limitations on available transmission options as many, like myself, don't like other idea of spinning 3,000 rpms + cruising down the road at interstate speed. A 2 speed axle is great and a nice compromise but probably too complex for some, NOT ALL, to operate properly....and adds costs.
Charles27909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 03:16 AM   #36
Member
 
Charles27909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayza View Post
Didn't mean to start a debate! For me diesel vs gas doesn't matter, as said it is only a matter of HP. Would like to see gas engines in the back driving the rear wheels. The big thing I am missing from my gasser is that beautiful storage area underneath the coach. For the different in price between gas and diesel I can do all of the suspension upgrades I want - even if I put LiquidSprings on I still wouldn't come close to the price of a DP.
You can also install a full air ride. All mechanical springs stuff is taken off and a full air bag air ride put on.
Charles27909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 03:18 AM   #37
Member
 
Charles27909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by DegoRed View Post
One thing that has always made me ponder, why is Ford using these V10's and not their Powerstroke engines? I get that the V10 has been around forever, but the diesel in my F250 puts out over 450HP & over 900TQ(I don't know exact #'s off top of my head). Now this is more HP than my current rig @350HP, but the TQ is less than my current @1100TQ, but still seems using the Powerstroke would open up a lot of options, both in the terms of Front & Rear mounting.
Complex emissions bullcrap is the most likely reason. And cost. It keeps new chassis below $30K.
Charles27909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 03:19 AM   #38
Member
 
Charles27909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaldow View Post
Big block gas, could be be an option, turbo charged, etc. . .

All the excuses, EPA, cooling, are just R&D baloney - just saying for now, kinda like an old smoking diesel, G.E. fixed that in the locomotive division - now didn't they ?
Compared to a steam engine....YES.
Charles27909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 03:21 AM   #39
Member
 
Charles27909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by nothermark View Post
The EPA is not baloney. The rest may be. No idea what GE is doing with their diesels.


Do a bit of looking at what some folks who make the rules want and your big diesel's days may also be numbered. They can't meet the emissions/mile standards that are proposed by those folks.
The EPA is a drain on society.
Charles27909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 03:22 AM   #40
Member
 
Charles27909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 69
Too bad no RV builder offers a glider kit motorhome....lol.
Charles27909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 03:26 AM   #41
Member
 
Charles27909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superburban View Post
Look what the pickup truck makers are doing in the 1/2 ton market. Under 3 liter engine, twin turbos, and tow ratings never imagined in a 1/2 ton 10 years ago. And getting 15 plus MPG towing. Wait until that technology get applied to the motorhome/ school bus market, and it may give diesels a run for their money.
I would be interested to see the same also. In addition, to mid sized small block gas like 5.4, 5.3, etc gas engines with one or two turbos.
Charles27909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 05:11 AM   #42
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 69
Best motorhome I ever owned was a GMC, fast, economical, smooth ride, and excellent view of the road. Price killed the coach along with the gas shortage, I believe they built them 1973 - 1977, they were front wheel drive with a 455 or 402 Tornado engine and drive train

Sent from my SM-T550 using iRV2 - RV Forum mobile app
Tradition is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
engine, gas



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1/2 ton engines to avoid? Engines to pick? tuffr2 Trailer Towing and Tow Vehicles Discussion 96 03-19-2018 03:57 PM
4 wheel drive or 2 wheel drive for 5th wheel merlins Trailer Towing and Tow Vehicles Discussion 27 08-22-2014 02:40 PM
Some Front Wheel Drive Cars Can't be Towed on Dolly? Milehghcty Toads and Motorhome Related Towing 32 01-03-2011 03:15 PM
2 wheel drive vs 4 wheel drive?? Ted Thurlby Excel Owner's Forum 18 12-01-2008 06:59 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.