Go Back   iRV2 Forums > MOTORHOME FORUMS > Class A Motorhome Discussions
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-23-2014, 03:55 PM   #29
Senior Member
Pusherman's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 2,619
Originally Posted by CampDaven View Post
The computer provides a somewhat educated guess, and does not account for fuel use by the generator or Aqua Hot. Semi-accurate MPG is done over an extended period using a calculator. ...
Actually the computer does exactly what it's supposed to do, which is calculate fuel mileage (mpg) as used by the engine. As stated above, it does not measure fuel used by the aqua-hot, or generator. But it is accurate regarding the fuel consumed by the engine.

Since it's measuring flow rate of fuel consumed by the engine, it's way more accurate than hand calculations, which obviously do take into consideration all other fuel used, such as by the generator, or aqua-hot system if so equipped.

Here's the catch: The pre-2006 Freightliner computers which came with the 'dim display' are not resettable. It averages fuel consumed by the engine from day one. Therefore it's averaging in early engine break-in mileage, etc.

My coach (2007) does have the resettable Freightliner computer, and I find it more accurate than any calculations I can do, based on all the reasons others have posted, such as fuel foaming at fill-up, and never getting to the same 'full' level every tank fill. I reset my 'tank' mpg calculation at every fuel fill-up.

I don't know about the other computers, but the newer FL computers are great. I actually have 3 different mpg calculators on my FL display.

'07 Winnebago Journey 34H - CAT C7, Koni's, MCU's, SS Bell Crank, Safe-T-Plus
'07 HHR Toad, SMI AFO, Blue OX
Pusherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 03-23-2014, 04:04 PM   #30
Senior Member
smiller's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,706
Originally Posted by Coma View Post
Cool feature! If you did that only on legs where there was no generator or AquaHot usage I sure you could get pretty close.
Yes, when you fill up the unit displays how much fuel it thinks you've used. When that matches the number on the pump (and magically, it does after a while) then... you're there. At that point the MPG readout is about as accurate as anything is going to be (exclusive of other fuel-using components of course.)

The device also displays any of several engine management parameters (via OBDII or other data bus) in real time as you drive. You can even program it to display proprietary custom data fields if the manufacturer makes the codes available.


smiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2014, 04:25 PM   #31
"Formerly Diplomat Don"
Dutch Star Don's Avatar
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Moorpark, Ca.
Posts: 10,122
My computer in my truck and car are pretty accurate because they are gas powered the tanks are small and fill the same every time.

This isn't true, for at least a diesel pusher. My previous coach was a Monaco with a 7' wide tank that was mounted from side to side. If the coach was not level during fill ups, it could be off by 5 gallons either direction.

I use the Silverleaf monitor to track mileage and use a pencil and paper to compare. I believe you can't get accurate mileage in a DP without at least 10-15 fill ups in a row, but can be close. I believe in tracking my mileage for all the reasons listed. By running the Silverleaf "Recent Mileage gauge" I can track how the coach is doing instantly. It will often tell me we're climbing a subtle grade that can't be seen or there is a headwind. I often adjust my driving habits as such, saving me fuel.

The other thing that is forgotten about diesel fuel tracking is that often a diesel pumps fuel to the engine and quite a bit of it is returned to the tank. To me, the best way to track diesel mileage would be run it to and from the engine via two flow meters. Subtract the difference and you would know exactly how much fuel was being used.

I had a flow meter in my boat that was accurate to 3/10's of a gallon in a 40 gallon fill up. It was a great safety issue in a boat.
Don & Mary
2014 Newmar Dutch Star - All Electric - 450 ISL
2016 GMC Canyon 4WD Crew Cab
Dutch Star Don is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2014, 07:55 PM   #32
Senior Member
Retired and Happy's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stone Mountain, GA
Posts: 941
I take my MPG (instant or avg) witha huge helping of salt. I noticed the miles-remaining-to-empty varies greatly. For one point, it depends on whether the rig is on the same plane for every fill and whether you fill it the same way every fill. Both are nearly impossible. But my miles-to-empty may read 450 immediately after a fillup. 30 miles down the road it may read 435 or 460, then 100 miles further, it may read 400. Again this may also be a function of the plane of the tank at any measurement moment. I say plane of the tank rather than attitude of the tank, because I believe my tank has a bad attitude.

Whatever the variables, the rig gets around 5.5 - 6 mpg. Usually, or sometimes...
Ken, Judy, and the Angels--2005 Fleetwood Southwind--2008 Cargo Trailer--2003 EZGO Golf Cart
Retired and Happy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2014, 08:52 PM   #33
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 623
Our MPG by the computer is 7.1. Our scan gauge read 8.2. Neither takes into account what the generator uses.
2008 Thor, Four Winds Mandalay 40G. Cummins 400 isl. Freightliner chassis
koda59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 12:13 PM   #34
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 366
Diesel fuel foams a lot and you will need to check several tanks of fueling to be able to get a somewhat accurate reading of fuel consumption. It is important since a drop in 1-2 MPG average can mean problems w/ engine, exhaust manifold, turbo charger,etc that may need attention. I have had those problems w/ my Gasser and Diesel Motorhomes.
2002 Dutchstar, Spartan Chassis, 350 Cummins, 2012 Explorer.
Snomas1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 01:05 PM   #35
Senior Member
smiller's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,706
Originally Posted by Snomas1 View Post
Diesel fuel foams a lot and you will need to check several tanks of fueling to be able to get a somewhat accurate reading of fuel consumption.
Yes, it can be challenging (or at least time-consuming) to truly top-off diesel tanks due to the foaming. Practically, you just can't do it at every fillup, making keeping a log of MPG difficult. That's one reason to invest in a Scanguage or other accurate aftermarket MPG gauge. Once calibrated (and if you keep them calibrated) they are pretty darn accurate, maybe better than you can do be hand, at least in the real world. Especially since a manual method can't take into account generator usage, but with an accurate MPG gauge you can shut down the generator, reset the gauge, and drive for a while on level ground. The average MPG figure from the gauge will give you a reasonably good figure to work with (Again, this is with a good, calibrated aftermarket gauge. The stock ones usually aren't that great.)

To get them calibrated you need consistency in determining the amount of fuel added to the tank. Actually seeing the fuel level in the tank filler is the bast way, but as mentioned that may not always be possible on large diesel tanks. Another way that works pretty well is to fill at less than the maximum rate and use when the nozzle first shuts off. That will be fairly consistent and while that may not fill your tank it will give you a pretty good tank-to-tank refill quantity, and that's all you need for calibration. Once done you need only repeat the process once in a while to keep things calibrated and not worry about it on every fillup, yet another reason a good MPG gauge is sometimes better than trying to do things by hand.
smiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 01:42 PM   #36
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Western New York
Posts: 550
Reading this thread seems like only the DP owners are interested in their MPG. I am in the same opinion of one of the earliest posts and that being "who cares now". Of course prior to last season I tracked my MPG as accurate as I manually could. I wrote down in a log at every fill up, whether it was 6 gallons to top off the tank, so I could work off a full tank calculation after a trip, or fill from near empty. Now, I just do a quick calculate for reasons stated to keep tabs, but no wore log etc. Why bother? My gas rig avgs. between 7.5-8 or 6.5-7 with or with out tow +/- either way. I find myself less concerned with full use now, just pull out the Discover Card and fill'er up!
vincee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 02:51 PM   #37
Senior Member
Cat320's Avatar
Fleetwood Owners Club
American Coach Owners Club
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,975
One reason I keep track of mileage my 'current trip' mileage is to determine how many miles I'm going to get out of a tank of fuel. Seven MPG vs eight MPG is a difference of 100 miles if you have a 100 gallon tank. A big head or tail wind can make that difference.
2014 American Eagle 45T
DD 500
Pulling a Honda CRV
Cat320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 02:54 PM   #38
Senior Member
davendeb's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 703
Mine is dead on.

2008 Tundra DC, 5.7L, Airlift 5000 Airbags
2013 Rockwood 8282WS
Signature Untralight Diamond Package
davendeb is offline   Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel MPG on 2014 Ram Diesel t.l.t. Cummins Engines 9 05-13-2014 04:08 AM
Computer board under curb side of coach? dnystrom Winnebago Industries Owner's Forum 10 03-16-2014 09:37 AM
Cummins ISX Achieves 10.7 MPG in Latest Test DriVer RV Industry Press 0 02-18-2014 11:44 AM
Slight Improvement in C7 mpg mbrandt1402 Caterpillar Engine Forum 2 01-26-2014 10:30 PM
Diesel Break in before MPG improve bobfa Trailer Towing and Tow Vehicles Discussion 21 11-18-2013 08:50 PM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.