Join CruisersForum Today
Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-04-2007, 12:44 PM   #1
M&S Norrell is offline
Senior Member
M&S Norrell's Avatar
Excel Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lake Jackson, Tx
Posts: 155
We are not fulltimers; more like one 3-4 day weekend each month. We currently have 2000 F-350 SRW Crew cab 4x4 w/ 3.73 gears and are ready to upgrade. Dealers making all kind or promises on gas mileage etc. Is there a difference between F-350 & F-450 driving (w/o the rig on back) gas mileage? What will that 4.30 or 4.10 or 4.88 do to mileage. We'd still like to keep the crew cab for the extra space. Our unit is the 2007 35MKE so I think its about 14K maybe 15K when we load everything up. Then again there is the new Dodge, but not sure about towing capacity. Upgraded the hitch to Reese 17.5K already. One dealer said F-450 had larger wheels so the traveled further on single rotation; thereby saving on gas???

__________________
Sue

2009 Limited Special Edition 35MKE
  Reply With Quote
   
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 09-04-2007, 01:08 PM   #2
CD is offline
CD
Senior Member


Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kingston, Wa. USA
Posts: 935
M&S Norrell
I would go with the F450 size and duals. You have a lot of trailer for a 1ton. I wouldn't pick gear ratio just for milage. I did that with my first '01. I got the 3:54 and to keep from lugging the engine you had to drive 65/70. After totaling it I got another one just like it except the 4:10 gears. I liked it much better and only lost about 1/2 mpg. I didn't buy the 6 speed for an overdrive.

__________________
Cliff

'01 3500 Ram QC HO 6sp. BD Exhaust Brake
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 09-04-2007, 04:45 PM   #3
jperry29 is offline
Senior Member
jperry29's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Johns Creek, GA
Posts: 208
The F-450 can, and probably will, have a longer wheel base than your F-350. The frame and suspension are definitely heavier and stiffer. While your F-350 weighs between 6 & 7 thousand pounds, the F-450 will start pushing 9,000.

Even if the gear ratios are the same (and despite the claim associated with the 19.5" wheels), the simple physics of getting that much extra weight moving means your mileage is going to be less in the F-450. How much less depends on your driving routine. If you have to do a lot of stop-and-go, you are really going to notice a difference. If you spend lots of time at highway speeds, then not so much.

The ride, loaded or unloaded, in the F-450 is stiffer. But I have to tell you, having the heavier frame and suspension and bigger brakes once hooked up to all that weight makes it worth it to me (I changed from an F-250 to an F-550 in '06). If those weights on your trailer are right you are surely bumping the maximum capacity of an F-350. Running at or above maximum rating is generally a quick way to wear out a really expensive vehicle.

I have the 6.0L and 4.88 gears. Regardless of which gear set, loaded or unloaded, the "sweet spot" for fuel economy is 2000rpm for the 6.0. Unfortunately that translates into about 53mph for my rig. Of course I can go faster but fuel economy drops rapidly for every 100rpm that I add. I would expect that the new twin turbo 6.4's would be about the same.
__________________
'06 F-550 PSD Tow Boss
33' Kountry Star by Newmar
Wife, 1 Siberian Huskie
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 09-05-2007, 03:42 AM   #4
Rick A is offline
Senior Member
Rick A's Avatar
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boerne, TX
Posts: 522
Send a message via Yahoo to Rick A
I have read numerous complaints on dieselstop.com about the fuel mileage being noticably worse on the new 6.4 because of the new emmissions. Looking at the brochure a F-350 DRW 4X4 with 4.10 is rated for 5th wheel towing at 15,200. If you are correct on your trailer weights, then I think that would be too close. Move up to 4:30 and that gets you 17,700 which should be plenty. If you go to F-450, lowest rating is 20,000 so no problem with either 4:30 or 4:88. It soesn't look like anything in SRW is going to have enough towing capacity for your trailer. So it look like you are looking at DRW with 4:30 or 4:88. My preference would be F-350 w/ 4:30 for ride and fuel efficiency.
__________________
2005 F-250 XLT 4X4 V-10
2006 Wildcat 31QBH
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 09-05-2007, 06:37 AM   #5
K-Star is offline
Moderator Emeritus
K-Star's Avatar


Newmar Owners Club
Mid Atlantic Campers
Ford Super Duty Owner
Texas Boomers Club
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Fulltime - Currently somewhere in the lower 48
Posts: 1,724
with my old F-250 (7.3l) and 3.73 gears I averaged around 12 pulling the trailer and 18-19 solo. With my new truck (6.0 with 4:30's) I get around 16 solo and 10 towing. The lower the gear (higher number = lower gear) the less MPG you will get as the rpm's are higher.

I haven't compared the F-450 to the F-350 spec's so I don't know if the F-450 is longer or not. I recall a time when I was spec'ing an F-450 using the Ford commercial truck website, there were a choice of wheelbases. Spec'ing an F-450 now, wheelbase is not an choice.

I agree that going to a DRW is the better option for two reasons. Increased payload and more stability when towing. Additionally, the F-450 will give you more flexibilty if you ever decide to replace your current trailer. But how often do we RV'ers ever think of upgrading their rig????
__________________
John, Joyce & Libby the Yellow Lab. - Fulltime since May 2008
2005 Kountry Star FW-35LKSA
by Newmar pulled by 2008 Ford F-450 King Ranch, PSD, Automatic, 4:88's
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 09-05-2007, 07:17 AM   #6
RustyJC is offline
Moderator Emeritus
RustyJC's Avatar


Texas Boomers Club
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cypress, Texas USA
Posts: 6,626
In response to your original question, a DRW truck is highly recommended for pulling a heavy 5th wheel. Since a 5th wheel transfers ~20% or more of its weight to the truck as pin weight, a SRW truck will invariably exceed its GVWR long before it reaches its "manufacturer's trailer tow rating" in a 5th wheel application.

The "gotcha" clause in the brochures that cite the manufacturer's trailer tow ratings is buried in the fine print with a statement similar to "None of the truck's other ratings are to be exceeded when towing."

Rusty
__________________
2011 Dodge Ram 3500 Laramie Cummins 6.7L/6 speed auto/4.10LS crew cab LB dually
2004 Doubletree Mobile Suites 36RE3 5th wheel
Come join us on a TEXAS BOOMERS rally!
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 09-05-2007, 07:44 AM   #7
TXiceman is online now
Moderator Emeritus
TXiceman's Avatar


Vintage RV Owners Club
Texas Boomers Club
Oklahoma Boomers Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 11,982
Like Rusty noted....read all of the fine print...that is where they bury the gotcha.

The truck tow ratings are based on a stripped base model truck to minimize curb weight and maximize towing rating. A lighter weight SRW truck will have a higher tow rating, but the payload capacity will be the problem. Look at the GVWR sticker and rear axle GAWR on the B pillar tag on the truck.

A typical 5er will carry close to 20% of the trailers GVWR on the pin. So if you look at a trailer with GVWR of 15000#, you can expect a loaded pin weigh of close to 3000#.

As an example, we have a 14,400# GVWR 5er and a 1 ton dually with a GVWR or 11500#. I have a loaded pin weight of almost 3000#. The truck weights 8000#, fully loaded, full fuel and hitch. So I have a actual payload capacity of 3500#, only 500# above my ready to travel load.

No way I could be in ratings with a SRW truck.

So what dictates the use of SRW vs. DRW is the trailer pin weight and the real world payload capacity of the truck.

Ken
__________________
Amateur Radio Operator|Practicing for our retirement! 2008 Cameo 35SB3 - 2002 7.3L Crew Cab Dually w/ a SCMT - Max Brake - Travel with one Miniature Schnauzer, one Standard Schnauzer and one small Timneh African Gray Parrot
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 09-05-2007, 07:52 PM   #8
Ray,IN is offline
Senior Member
Ray,IN's Avatar


Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North America somewhere
Posts: 4,925
If I were shopping for a Ford F450, hereis where I'd spend some time. These prices are the same-or lower- than for a F350 locally.

That blarny about larger wheel turning slower and getting better mileage- . It it were true these MH guys driving on 22.5" tires must be getting fantastic mileage.
__________________
"As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances there is a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged. And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air - however slight - lest we bec
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 09-06-2007, 02:11 AM   #9
Rick A is offline
Senior Member
Rick A's Avatar
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boerne, TX
Posts: 522
Send a message via Yahoo to Rick A
The 2008 F-450 is the same dimensions as the F-350. They are both using the same cab and bed. The differences are larger tires, brakes, and heavier suspension.
__________________
2005 F-250 XLT 4X4 V-10
2006 Wildcat 31QBH
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 09-20-2007, 10:03 AM   #10
Dieselgem is offline
Member
Dieselgem's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA & FL
Posts: 47
M&S

I have the 2008 F450 and it is a great towing machine. The suspension is great and the brakes are huge. It is however made for towing heavier loads and not geared for the best MPG. There are a lot of posts on the dieselstop forum regarding this issue.
__________________
08-KZ Escalade 41'CKS Escalade

2008 F450 Super Duty Truck
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 09-20-2007, 05:11 PM   #11
powerboatr is offline
Senior Member
powerboatr's Avatar


Damon Owners Club
Freightliner Owners Club
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North East Texas
Posts: 2,254
Quote:
Originally posted by Rick A:
The 2008 F-450 is the same dimensions as the F-350. They are both using the same cab and bed. The differences are larger tires, brakes, and heavier suspension.
acyually the new 450 pickup is a hybrid it combines the 450 frnt frame on a 350 rear frame, it gets a wider frint wheel track that get closer the matching the rear wheels outer track.

we have a 4.30 in our 350 tow boss, our sweet spt for POWER in my 6.0 is 2200 rpm nets us 12-13 towing
15-16 empty
2000 rpm is good but lugs to much with the trailer in tow and will dwn shift to much

this being said i am switching to 22.5 wheels now to to get better MPG LOL thats a good un

if we were to go new the 450 would be a serious contender as would a retired class 8
but now with registration fees not to my liking i may switch to a DP
__________________
USN Retired, Life time member of the DAV.
driving the short bus 4056 Tuscany
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 09-24-2007, 12:07 PM   #12
NeFlaGuy is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1
We purchased the new F450 (6.4L) 4.88 and with a little sly of 5,000 miles are currently getting an average of 11 mpg. The turning radius is out standing. We have not had any problems what so ever in these first 5,000 miles. This is all without towing. We will be taking delivery of our new NuWa in the first part of Oct.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 09-24-2007, 12:21 PM   #13
Hitchhiker is offline
Community Administrator
Hitchhiker's Avatar


Appalachian Campers
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Buladean, NC
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally posted by NeFlaGuy:
We will be taking delivery of our new NuWa in the first part of Oct.

Lou,

Welcome to iRV2, we're really glad to have you here as a new member and are looking forward to reading your posts about your experiences and adventures in your new F450 and also with the new HitchHiker Champagne 37CKRD you have on order. That's the identical trailer I have.

You'll find a great bunch of folks on this site who are very knowledgeable of RVing, , just as you've found over on the NuWa Owners Forums. As you'll soon see, they're eager to help and share their knowledge and experiences with others.

Again, welcome to iRV2, we're glad you joined.
__________________
'11 GMC Acadia SLT AWD
'11 GMC Sierra 1500 4x4 Extended Cab
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 10-02-2007, 04:56 PM   #14
M&S Norrell is offline
Senior Member
M&S Norrell's Avatar
Excel Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lake Jackson, Tx
Posts: 155
Dieselgem - Saw the truck pics - looks just like ours EXCEPT...where did you get the running boards? Ours came witht the tubular ones and there is just not enough tread for my liking. Also, I saw you had the transfer flow gas tank. I am looking at the Transfer flow 60 gallon replacement tank. Hoping someone will work out how to hack the onboard computer so the miles to empty etc. works correctly - not detrimental though, I can still read my gas guage.
How much does your unit weigh (also what is pin weight)? Our Excel 35MKE squats our truck more than we were expecting! (15K w/3200# pin). We have the Reese signature series 18K hitch with TrailAir Hitch Pin, and at the lowest settings our rig still rides a little high in the front. We have about 7" between bed and 5th wheel tongue. How about you? 400 mile trip w/ less than 1000 miles on truck netted us 7.4mpg; hopefully that will improve somewhat

__________________
Sue

2009 Limited Special Edition 35MKE
  Reply With Quote
   
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2008 F-450 vs. F-350 GAS MILEAGE ETC. M&S Norrell Powerstroke Engine Forum 6 09-29-2008 12:45 PM
To SRW or DRW that is the question? 96PSD Towing and Tow Vehicles Discussion 14 04-27-2007 10:33 PM
04 F-350 LB 6.0 L SRW Savagesam Truck Camper Discussion 6 04-11-2006 11:53 AM
SRW or DRW to Tow Legacy 328 Trap Towing and Tow Vehicles Discussion 7 03-20-2006 04:44 PM
New truck question - SRW or DRW? Mick9064 Truck Camper Discussion 49 03-11-2005 12:57 PM

Download our Mobile App






1% for the Planet
» Upcoming Rallies
No events scheduled in
the next 365 days.
» iRV2 on facebook

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 PM.