Join CruisersForum Today
Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
GM idler arms
Old 08-01-2011, 10:03 PM   #1
VanDiemen23 is offline
Senior Member
VanDiemen23's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 237
I've heard that GM has problems with idler arms and my experience certainly verifies it. My 89 went thru 3 in 186K and my current 2001 K2500HD is getting it's 3rd at 102K.

They're only ~30 bucks at NAPA but for heavens sake they shouldn't be a maintenance item!

I mentioned to the guys at SuperSteer that they were missing out on a huge opportunity to build an arm that lasts (pittman arms too!) but they weren't interested.

Who else has this problem?

Truck is stock, no lift, no serious off-roading, and not a lot of towing either.

I also noticed that the brake heat destroys the top ball joint boots in no time.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-01-2011, 10:21 PM   #2
Airtool is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 248
How are the Upper and Lower ball joints? Have they ever been changed?
My ball joins needed to be replace before I traded for a Frieghtliner chassis.
I also have a 2001, 3/4ton Sub. They are a little loose,but not to where they need replacing,YET!!! It has 94K on it now.

Dick.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-01-2011, 11:09 PM   #3
VanDiemen23 is offline
Senior Member
VanDiemen23's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 237
despite the lack of seals and exposure to grit, the ball joints seem to be OK. Kind of hard to tell though because even on the jack the torsion bars load the joints. I understand you put a lever between the upright and a-arm to try and get some motion out of them as a test.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-03-2011, 10:39 AM   #4
jmaotto is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
I have 101,000 on my 02 Duramax. The front end is still like new. I think many people are not aware of the grease fitting on the Idler arm. May be that is the reason for the wear.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-03-2011, 07:15 PM   #5
VanDiemen23 is offline
Senior Member
VanDiemen23's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 237
Worse than just the idler arm. Just got back from the shop - idler, pittman, steering box, drag link, all beat to hell. The upper ball joints are not too bad but the boots are gone (brake heat gets to 'em) - so they'll get done too.

The 8.1 puts a LOT of weight on the front end, especially with the transfer case, but I can't imagine it to be heavier than the duramax - but maybe so.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-03-2011, 07:49 PM   #6
Kurmudgeon is offline
Senior Member
Kurmudgeon's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanDiemen23 View Post
Worse than just the idler arm. Just got back from the shop - idler, pittman, steering box, drag link, all beat to hell. The upper ball joints are not too bad but the boots are gone (brake heat gets to 'em) - so they'll get done too.

The 8.1 puts a LOT of weight on the front end, especially with the transfer case, but I can't imagine it to be heavier than the duramax - but maybe so.
The weight of the engine should have little or no bearing on the wear of those components. None of them is a load bearing component. Ball joints, yes, but you say those are OK.

Have you considered a second opinion, to make sure you don't have someone who is more parts changer than mechanic?

JP
__________________
Jim Price
I prefer travel where destinations are optional and not necessarily desirable.
79 27' Holiday Rambler Statesman, 78 32' Holiday Rambler Imperial, 77 Monaco truck camper
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-04-2011, 07:27 AM   #7
VanDiemen23 is offline
Senior Member
VanDiemen23's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 237
They aren't loadbearing parts - until you try to move a wheel with a lot of weight on it.

I've gone to these guys for several years now, and this is the first time they've come bck to me with a list longer than what I went in with, and I've heard no complaints around the community (25,000 people with just one major employer).

I get the old parts back though, so I'll be able to evaluate them myself.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-04-2011, 11:59 AM   #8
glennwest is offline
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 68
I got 137000 on my GM 3500 diesel dually. upper ball joints at 120000, pittman and idler at 100000. Changed the pittman and idler myself. Rather simple. Used a cutter to get pittman arm off.
__________________
2006 Mobile Suite 32TK3 2005 GMC Sierra 3500 4X4 dually 4-door Full time going from job to job. Building and maintaining plants across the USA.
  Reply With Quote
   
Old 08-12-2011, 08:35 PM   #9
VanDiemen23 is offline
Senior Member
VanDiemen23's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 237
final cost - $1750 - including a new upper control arm (right side upper ball joint gone).

I have a friend with more than 300K on his 8.1L dually, and no such problems. Seems part of the issue is to not let the idler go too long, or the rest of it will follow.

Kind of funny - you get used to driving something with sloppy steering and when you get it fixed it's like a new vehicle - actually goes where it's pointed now.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
   
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official Monaco Tech Tip RE: Trailing Arms! jamorton Monaco Owner's Forum 1 01-17-2011 09:57 PM
Adjusting non-electric awning arms KU9L Excel Owner's Forum 25 03-24-2010 08:00 PM
Cayman rear trailing arms joelorsr Monaco Owner's Forum 2 12-21-2009 06:21 PM

Download our Mobile App






1% for the Planet
» Upcoming Rallies
No events scheduled in
the next 365 days.
» iRV2 on facebook

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 AM.