Community Forums

jodann · 07-17-2011, 06:21 AM

Now that she's been released I predict that she'll become obscenely wealthy by releasing her own line of designer jeans, perfumes & handbags.

MaverickBBD · 07-18-2011, 07:27 AM

NOT guilty. The jury said so and they are the only ones that matter.

62Morgan · 07-18-2011, 07:31 AM

And, just "Who" will buy these things and put money in her coffer? Sorry, but, this girl has no celebrity followers; no fans to speak of. Her only real hope of income would be from her so-called photographic ability & any foolhardy attempt at a book or movie deal. Perish that thought!

faye · 07-18-2011, 11:48 PM

Just how many of posters saying not guilty or the almighty jury has spoken is male ? The media says they are the majority. Just throwing a word in for the media who seems to be taking a beating instead of individual indifference or lack of common sense.

MaverickBBD · 07-19-2011, 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by faye

Just how many of posters saying not guilty or the almighty jury has spoken is male ? The media says they are the majority. Just throwing a word in for the media who seems to be taking a beating instead of individual indifference or lack of common sense.

I wonder how many people that say guilty believe: "Judge ye not, lest ye be judged".

Mekanic · 07-19-2011, 09:52 AM

She was found not guilty of the charges Because the pros went for the touchdown instead of a field goal.
It was the same with the other BIG cases.
The prosacuters go all out and fall short. THey are too used to people admitting to what they did.
There simply wasen't enough evidice to convict on a 1st degree murder rap.
Haven't they ever heard of manslaughter?
Tampering with evidice?
Abuse of a corpse??
THese last two they could have made work.

Forest Grump · 07-19-2011, 12:44 PM

Huh?

Me n Slowpoke · 07-19-2011, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by faye

Just how many of posters saying not guilty or the almighty jury has spoken is male ? The media says they are the majority. Just throwing a word in for the media who seems to be taking a beating instead of individual indifference or lack of common sense.

I am a female, and I am a mother, grandmother, great grandmother, I watched most of the trial and knew that prosecutors would not get a 'guilty' because they were too busy trying her on 'circumstancial' evidence.
It could have been anyone!

Prosecutors couldn't prove it......and unless you were present when that child died, neither can you....

Also, have any of you that insist that she is guilty ever served on a jury, or even been called to be interviewed for a jury seat..???? but then you have to register to vote before you can be a juror.....

MaverickBBD · 07-20-2011, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Me n Slowpoke

I am a female, and I am a mother, grandmother, great grandmother, I watched most of the trial and knew that prosecutors would not get a 'guilty' because they were too busy trying her on 'circumstancial' evidence.
It could have been anyone!

Prosecutors couldn't prove it......and unless you were present when that child died, neither can you....

Also, have any of you that insist that she is guilty ever served on a jury, or even been called to be interviewed for a jury seat..???? but then you have to register to vote before you can be a juror.....

ABSOLUTELY! An excellent reply!!

Me n Slowpoke · 07-21-2011, 05:31 PM

Thanks,

Helen

bldr11 · 07-21-2011, 07:15 PM

Wow,Did this thread open a can of worms

GUILTY!!!!!!

faye · 07-21-2011, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mekanic

she was found not guilty of the charges because the pros went for the touchdown instead of a field goal.
It was the same with the other big cases.
The prosacuters go all out and fall short. They are too used to people admitting to what they did.
There simply wasen't enough evidice to convict on a 1st degree murder rap.
Haven't they ever heard of manslaughter?
Tampering with evidice?
Abuse of a corpse??
These last two they could have made work.

they did have a charge of manslaughter for her , but jury did not choose this.

faye · 07-21-2011, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maverickbbd

absolutely! An excellent reply!!

i would venture to guess that most of the people on this forum that do not travel around alot, has served on a jury, my husband and i live in an area with a small jury pool and we are asked to serve almost every year. I would also think most people on this forum are registered voters, especially in light of the plight we are facing with social security and medicare.

faye · 07-21-2011, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maverickbbd

i wonder how many people that say guilty believe: "judge ye not, lest ye be judged".

in order to serve on a jury you have to be able and willing to judge, one of the jurors told judge perry that she did not want to judge anyone, he told her that is the job of a juror to judge, jurors judge in every trial, the judge judges in every trial, justices judge, it is our judicial system. When anyone is hired or fired, someone judges. Our judicial system is not perfect,but it is the best in the world,some people have been jailed,put to death when not gulilty, likewise, some who are guilty, even baby killers are found not guilty. If no one judged, just think of the criminals that would continue to prey on society. God bless everyone that has expressed an opinion, this is a wonderful privilege of the country we live in.