Go Back   iRV2 Forums > iRV2.com COMMUNITY FORUMS > Vintage RV's
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-07-2015, 08:08 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 3
Increasing fuel economy-Gear Vendor

I would like to increase the fuel economy of my 1986 Vogue 2, that has a 454, TH400 auto and a 4.88 rear end. Short of replacing the motor what would and Gear Vendor OD unit do for millage? Over all getting around and up hills would this type unit help? Thanks Philip

Getoutdigin is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-07-2015, 08:10 PM   #2
Senior Member
Mr_D's Avatar
Winnebago Owners Club
Solo Rvers Club
iRV2 No Limits Club
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 31,279
We added a GV OD unit to our '88 Okanagan 17' Type B MH with 460 and TT towing package. Made cruising much more pleasant but we never did get up to or over 10 mpg even so. In fact I would hazard to say that there was no increase in mileage, just quieter running.

2009 45' Magna 630 w/Cummins ISX 650 HP/1950 Lbs Ft
Charter Good Sam Lifetime Member, FMCA, SKP
RV'ing since 1957, NRA Benefactor Life, towing '14 CR-V
Mr_D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2015, 09:40 PM   #3
Senior Member
Wdebarmore's Avatar
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 185
Mine came from the factory with gear vendors overdrive. I really like it and always use it. I can't say for sure if it saves money, but it reduces rpm at cruise by about 500, which I assume is saving some fuel. I hear they're pretty pricey to purchase and have installed. It would take a long time to recoup the investment.
1988 34' Executive Industries - Executive Prestige
5.9 Cummins, Allison AT542
Wdebarmore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 07:05 AM   #4
Senior Member
Inthe70s's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 305
Based on my experience with vintage vehicles that have the 3 speed transmissions, the Gear Vendor does lower the RPM's and makes the drive a much more pleasant experience since the vehicle isn't screaming down the road but does little for MPG's. The price of those gear splitters are high and you most likely will not recoup the costs. Most folks do it for the better driving experience vs. fuel savings.
'74 F350 44K,'79 11' Mitchell Camper, MINT All Original
'79 Mitchell 25' Class C, 460 46K, MINT All Original
'97 Rexhall Aerbus, 60K, 460, F53, MINT All Original
Inthe70s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 07:26 AM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 253
I looked at gear vendor site many years ago on the first page it said if you are looking for better mpg SLOW DOWN I guess that guy got fired I see it no longer posted.
Raving is a hobby hobbies cost money
halftimer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 07:29 AM   #6
Senior Member
Randyman1's Avatar

Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 723
Getoutdigin, we had a 1985 Country Coach 35 ft 454 w/tag axle. Had the gear splitter added for the reasons you state and did absolutely nothing for fuel mileage. The best money we spent was to have Doug Thorley headers installed. They are really thick tubed headers, not the cheap kind like kids put on their street cars. The stock 454 exhaust manifold from that era was very flow restrictive. That added performance and I'm sure helped the fuel economy some as well. Never could get over 6ish mpg., but at least the engine was breathing better.
Randy & Kathy-n-Auggie
07 HR Navigator 43PBQ, 525hp Cummins ISX, 17 Ford Supercrew Ecoboost King Ranch 4x4
Randyman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 07:39 AM   #7
Senior Member
slowmachine's Avatar
Nor'easters Club
Freightliner Owners Club
Holiday Rambler Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alton, NH
Posts: 1,258
Increasing fuel economy-Gear Vendor

I would rather upgrade the transmission to a newer model, with 4 or more forward gears, than install an overdrive gearbox. For a vehicle of this vintage, the transmission (with no electronic communication with the engine ECU) should be a simple swap.

2000 Holiday Rambler Endeavor 40PBD
Freghtliner XC, CAT 3126B
2000 Holiday Rambler Endeavor 40PBD
Freightliner XC, CAT 3126B
slowmachine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2015, 10:18 AM   #8
ihc1470's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 58
Years ago I worked for a school bus contractor. In the fleet at that time the bus that got the best fuel economy was a 78 passenger class D unit that had a 250 hp DT466 navistar engine. Think it was around 7.6 average. The worst unit was a 35 passenger unit class C unit also DT466 but only rated at 180 hp. Think it was around 7.0. I do not recall what the rear end ratios were as this was 20 years ago. When you think about it your pushing a big barn door through the air which is what we also are doing with our RV's. I think the big difference between those 2 buses was the fact you could back out of the throttle a little sooner with the increased hp. I would guess the weight to hp ratio was better in the larger bus. Not been around one but I would venture the new RV units with all the electronics are not getting much better fuel economy than the 76 Dodge 440 that I am driving which runs right at 7. I know the new buses still get in the same mileage range and they have all the latest in electronics. It has more to due with frontal area that we have to push over length or weight. Talk to anyone that drives a class 8 truck. They don't change that much from empty to full load either because they still have to push the same amount of frontal area through the air. With the trucks if they can pick up a few tenths of a mile per gallon with all the skirting etc that they can add it will pay back over the life of the unit. But how many of use are going to put 750k to 1 mill miles on our RV before we move to a new one? I hate paying for the fuel too but I think the amount of money spent doing transmission swaps or gear upgrades is just as well spent at the pump. I find that if I keep the speed at around 50 mph that my fuel economy is slightly better. Best of luck to you no matter what route you go.
ihc1470 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2015, 07:59 AM   #9
Senior Member
DDDonkey's Avatar
National RV Owners Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 456
I looked into this same thing when I had my P30 MH and found that to get the most for my money, I need to change the transmission. I was told to get a transmission that had an overdrive and a locking torque converter, in the end it was not worth the cost.
2008 National SurfSide 34E (Bunk Model) Ford V10
Sold- 1990 Hawkins Chevy P30 454
DDDonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2015, 08:13 AM   #10
Senior Member
Triker56's Avatar
Fleetwood Owners Club
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,031
I put a US Gear overdrive on a 1983 P30 with a 454 engine in the early 90's.
At the same time had a Banks header exhaust system put on.

Next day I went on a 2 week trip out West. Gain in MPG was 0.
It did help some splitting the gears on 6% hills.

I wouldn't do it again. Money spent would been better used to buy gas for that no better then 6 MPG MH.
Traded it off for a DP that gets 10 + MPG. And much better at climbing 6% hills.
99 Discovery 34Q ISB
2014 MKS AWD EcoBoost Toad
Fulltime Since "99"
Triker56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 07:51 AM   #11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,510
Larger hp engine will get better mpg when larger hp is needed.

Past life the service trucks would have the 302 as smaller engine should be better on gas...The 351 got far better mpg and fewer troubles as well as it was not working as hard.

Focus on things that net more torque or power from the engine as these will allow it to work better at much better cost.

Simple things like a slightly smaller diameter tire could help just a bit as long as it is still proper capacity.

Tony & Lori
1989 Country Coach Savannah SE
TQ60 is offline   Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gear Vendor Overdrive azonsite Class A Motorhome Discussions 9 04-13-2015 09:55 PM
1991 Fleetwood 460 Ford fuel pump/starting problems Dick & Kathy Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum 7 10-05-2014 11:45 AM
Fuel Gauge, Sender, Empty Fuel Tank TwelveVolt Spartan Motorhome Chassis Forum 2 07-06-2014 11:54 AM
2005 Acert C13 low power and poor fuel economy slemnah Caterpillar Engine Forum 29 04-15-2014 04:26 PM
The Secrets of Better Fuel Economy dennis45 Class A Motorhome Discussions 13 03-25-2014 08:42 PM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.