Go Back   iRV2 Forums > iRV2.com COMMUNITY FORUMS > Vintage RV's
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-13-2009, 02:13 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
RedneckExpress's Avatar
 
Vintage RV Owners Club
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sauvie Island, OR
Posts: 2,353
Send a message via ICQ to RedneckExpress Send a message via AIM to RedneckExpress Send a message via MSN to RedneckExpress Send a message via Yahoo to RedneckExpress
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeatherTodd View Post
The new "magnum" v8s are not leaps and bounds better but enough to make a difference. Im talking stock vs stock.
The transmissions... thats another story.

Frankly their leaps and bounds worse, with that Plenum Gasket bit of genius on the underside of the intake manifold. Nothing quite like dumping your coolant into your oil valley when the gasket fails.

93 was the first year of the Magnum junk engines, so I got lucky. I've also got the old fashioned V-belts as well instead of the serpentine bugger.
__________________

__________________
RedneckExpress is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 11-13-2009, 02:17 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
kenyonman's Avatar
 
Damon Owners Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 178
Having owned a 72, 77 and now an 06 I have to say that with the tech advances newer is better. Although the newer lighter weight materials don't seem to be as durable as the old cast iron tubs...
__________________

__________________
kenyonman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 12:11 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 248
I've had a 2004 Itasca, a 2002 Beaver and now I'm restoring a 1984 Monaco that sold for $90k in 1984.

I'm enjoying the work because it was so well put together - real wood throughout, screws and not staples.
The fact that I can work on a 25 year old Motorhome that is testament to the way that it was made and certain construction techniques used in it are better than what we have today - I'll never see delam because the sides were never laminated - sides were hung in place and the joins were calked and screwed.

Modern motorhomes have better engines and transmissions and far better chassis but the house parts are going to have a hard time lasting for 25 years and I really don't think I'd be too keen on working on a modern motorhome in 25 years time due to the amount of electronics - if the wiring rots then it would be a nightmare chasing wires.
If the roof leaks and gets into the fabric of the motorhome then how easy will it be to repair?

So yes, I think that earlier motorhomes were better made - but the new ones have a lot more features to offer you.
__________________
steveclv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 08:59 PM   #32
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Socorro, NM (until ?)
Posts: 1,552
How many of the 2000 era Rv's will be on the road 30 years later? Our 1977 Class C has had repair work plus needs some more. We do need to remodel it to accomodate current needs. Stacey will get our Class C for a few years until she decides what she needs in an RV to full-time in. Our RV has a wood frame which can be repaired. Our metal siding clad walls do not delaminate like the newer fiberglass units. I do wish the chassis frame was originally built heftier but I think we can have the original frame re-enforced with a little welding. We need to pull a 6000lb jeep plus a little cart.... or rather Stacey will at some point.
__________________

__________________
Lorna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Book values on older motorhomes? Nick-B Class A Motorhome Discussions 20 09-09-2012 06:46 PM
of RVs and HOAs chasfm11 Just Conversation 15 05-27-2010 02:55 PM
Not Just RVs chasfm11 Just Conversation 5 08-19-2009 10:07 PM
New shop to update older RVs Route 66 iRV2.com General Discussion 1 05-21-2008 01:42 PM
Retrofit Gilde-Ride Hitch Pin Box on NUWA 5 th wheel RV's richardcoxid 5th Wheel Discussion 2 02-11-2006 07:45 AM

» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.