|
|
09-17-2010, 01:18 AM
|
#29
|
Senior Member
Outdoors RV Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Manitoba,Canada
Posts: 2,789
|
I am terrified of having a tire blowout. I realize that it's not an issue of 'if' I have a tire blowout, but 'when'.
Over the years, I've driven everything from 1/2 ton pickups, to 1 ton diesels, to 5 ton tag axle diesel trucks, to semi trucks, and now finally a Class A RV. I've experienced tire blow outs on everything except the Class A, and now what I've been hearing has terrified me.
I've come to realize that our motor coaches are poorly designed machines that are already practically overloaded before we step up into them to use them.
When I first began driving my motor coach, I used to 'float' along at 75 mph because the engine had no problem doing that. Now I refuse to drive faster than 55 mph under any circumstances.
I think that we are totally to blame for letting the RV manufacturer's sell us Class A RV's that can totally lose control and kill us just because a tire blows out. I think if the RV was properly built, a tire blow out may well cause damage to the vehicle, but a total loss of control, leading to death?
We have friends that travel in a Prevost full time with 11 children! They had a tire blowout last winter on winter roads, without drama or fear of danger to their lives. Their only problem was the travel delay waiting for a tow truck and the related service work, and repairs to their coach.
We shouldn't have to buy steering stabilizers, and 'run flat safety rings', and a multitude of steering and stabilizing aids to make our 'big rigs' handle properly and safely. Commercial customers wouldn't put up with it, they'd just hand the unit back and refuse to continue the payments. Why do we put up with it?
I watched a highway tractor blow the left front tire. The tire exploded, and blew the fiberglass engine hood into a thousand pieces. There were pieces of tire, pieces of fiberglass engine hood, and all kinds of pieces of that truck blowing all over the highway. I watched the truck. As soon as that tire exploded, the brake lights came on, and that truck quickly came to a stop in the middle of the highway. Then the driver slowly maneuvered that truck to the shoulder.
I'm sorry, but I think that's the way it should work for us with our Class A RV's.
I realize that this is probably going to start a great big argument, but that's the way I'm feeling about this right now.
__________________
2016 Creekside 23RKS
2012 Ram 2500 Laramie 4X4 Cummins 6.7L
Canada, eh?
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
09-17-2010, 01:39 AM
|
#30
|
Registered User
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,899
|
Oh wow, what can I say, you are totally correct. The RVIA is a political organziation and does nothing to ensure that the manfacturers build safe and reliable units. That organization is made up of ex teachers who have no engineering experience at all. How do I know, they called the head Instructor at the training center I went to and asked him to work with them on their instruction and test materials. They don't have a clue. But every RV has their sticker, at 300 dollars or so a pop, wow it has a sticker.
The only thing we can do is be "aware", do the safety stuff before we move the coach each and every time. Don't count on your government (DOT) to make it right, because that same government cannot get the post office in the black and it's been running for almost 200 years.
It is up to us to make sure we do everything we can to be safe, each and every day.
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 11:53 AM
|
#31
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2
|
To: Mrs Roderick, We all feel very bad for you.
Tires we all have them and with class A RV"s you need to start to thinking like a trucker.
Alpine, it has a truck frame, class 8 truck front end class 8 truck rear end and has class 8 full size tires 11 R 22
Tires need to be taken off at 5 years old.
Some rv,s look at the tires at 5 years, and say they look good I keep air in them. The tires are good to go, so off they go. But ask a trucker they will tell you that you are on the the dark side if you do this. Look the alpine that we lost in nephi utah lost the tread and then went down.
(Speed) we all look at it, how fast you drive is up to you.
Some here are terrified to drive the class A for me I love to drive the alpine. For me its a truck on the down side and a very nice home on the top.
In the last life I was a trucker 28 years with a lot of trucks and I drove them all the time to see the people that shipped with us all over this big usa. We had tires go down on the front end from a nail a rock, things in the road. IN OVER 155,0000,000 MILES we did not lose the tread first then go down. Tires are the best way to spend the cash you worked so hard for. Be safe (5) and off for me.
__________________
Alpine 38 fdts
04
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 12:38 PM
|
#32
|
Member
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lake Havasu City, AZ
Posts: 85
|
Thank you for reposting the u-tube video. We watched it again to refresh us and will watch it every time before we take a trip, so hopefully we will be prepared if we do have a blow out or flat.
__________________
2005 Newmar DSDP 4320/ 2008 Jeep Liberty
3 1940 Ford Conv+1 in a basket (under Const.) Newest car 1941 Lincoln Zypher sedan.
Lake Havasu City, AZ
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 01:14 PM
|
#33
|
Senior Member
Fleetwood Owners Club Solo Rvers Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Some Place
Posts: 1,161
|
75 MPH is the MAX SPEED for for all Goodyear and Michelin RV tires.... Travel at MAX speed on a hot desert road for very long and you are an accident waiting to happen.
It's very sad that a life was lost... the pain the wife must feel has to be unbearable... I wish her my sincerest condolences.
__________________
1999 Fleetwood Bounder 32H Many Places Full Time No Dog * No Cat * No Co-Pilot
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 02:59 PM
|
#34
|
Senior Member
Monaco Owners Club Freightliner Owners Club Holiday Rambler Owners Club
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Spring Hill, Florida
Posts: 1,380
|
Agree with you Rick. Going 75 is a great risk in a Class A for everyone on the highway. My thoughts are to stay well below the design limit. When I had my blowout I was doing 55. Glad I saw the video.
__________________
98 Endeavor DP, ISB275
RX300, Falcon II hitch, BB Vantage Select
VMSpc, 2002 Grey Ford Powerstroke
TST 507 w/ 10 Sensors
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 03:32 PM
|
#35
|
Senior Member
Fleetwood Owners Club Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 341
|
I agree with jimkate.
__________________
JayGee
Foothills of the Smokies
2005 Bounder 35E
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 03:52 PM
|
#36
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Litchfield Park, Arizona
Posts: 10,530
|
[QUOTE=Renipladlo;703954] - Speed has a relation to mass which has a relation to stopping. QUOTE]
I agree with all your points Renipladlo. Maybe a physisist will correct me but if I'm not mistaken the energy required to stop us is actually determined by the mass of our rig times our velocity SQUARED. So speed has a much greater effect than even our weight on our ability to bring our rigs to a stop.
By saying that, I'm in no way suggesting that this coach in question was going too fast. Frankly I'm very skeptical of the original reports which indicate it was traveling 75 mph... but, none of us know.
Rick
__________________
Rick, Nancy, Peanut & Lola our Westie Dogs & Bailey the Sheltie.
2007 Itasca Ellipse 40FD
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 04:30 PM
|
#37
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 254
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1940 ford
Thank you for reposting the u-tube video. We watched it again to refresh us and will watch it every time before we take a trip, so hopefully we will be prepared if we do have a blow out or flat.
|
Yes, Yes, and I verbalize a blowout situation with my wife telling her what I am going to be doing per the video. Should do this once or more per trip, just like going through fire escape drill at least once per trip.
Bob
__________________
99DutchStarDP
Southern California
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 09:47 PM
|
#38
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 494
|
Ricko,
Actually the Kinetic Energy (KE) of a moving body is defined as:
KE = ½ x mass x velocity-squared
However, your point is well taken, since mass x velocity-squared, even when halved for the correct formula, still provides a huge KE for a 30,000 lb motor home @ 75mph.
For example with a 30,000 lb motor home,
KE = ½ x 30,000 lbs x 75mph-squared = 84,375,000 “somethings”
However, in modern physics, KE is stated in JOULES in the metric International System of Units (SI), so this example has to be converted to metric to be meaningful, instead of the "somethings". At most speeds and locations on earth,
a) Mass is stated in kilograms (kg), and
b) Velocity is stated in meters/sec (m/s).
In the SI system,
KE = ½ x kg x (m/s)-squared
So,
30,000 lbs = about 13,608 kg
75mph = about 121 kilometers/hour or 121,000 meters/hour or about 33.6 m/s
Therefore,
Equation (1) @ 75mph is: KE = ½ x 13,608 kg x (33.6 m/s)-squared = 7,681,443 Joules
Now at 62 mph (about 100 km/hr or 100,000 meters/hr or about 27.8 m/s), which seems to be the sweet spot for good fuel consumption on our coaches, the KE would be thus:
Equation (2) @ 62mph is: KE = ½ x 13,608 kg x (27.8 m/s)-squared = 5,258,403 Joules
Thus, the two KE results compare in this way:
At 75 mph, equation (1) is about 1.46 times as much KE as equation (2) is at 62 mph. For the moving motor home to come to a stop, this KE has to be dissipated in some way (friction, heat, vehicle damage, etc).
Note: I ignored the toad in this discussion.
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 10:49 PM
|
#39
|
Senior Member
Alpine Owners Club
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,563
|
__________________
2003 Alpine 40FDTS (400HP)
Long Beach, CA
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 10:51 PM
|
#40
|
Registered User
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,899
|
I second that YEP!!!!!
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 11:01 PM
|
#41
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 235
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale777
Ricko,
Actually the Kinetic Energy (KE) of a moving body is defined as:
KE = ½ x mass x velocity-squared
However, your point is well taken, since mass x velocity-squared, even when halved for the correct formula, still provides a huge KE for a 30,000 lb motor home @ 75mph.
For example with a 30,000 lb motor home,
KE = ½ x 30,000 lbs x 75mph-squared = 84,375,000 “somethings”
However, in modern physics, KE is stated in JOULES in the metric International System of Units (SI), so this example has to be converted to metric to be meaningful, instead of the "somethings". At most speeds and locations on earth,
a) Mass is stated in kilograms (kg), and
b) Velocity is stated in meters/sec (m/s).
In the SI system,
KE = ½ x kg x (m/s)-squared
So,
30,000 lbs = about 13,608 kg
75mph = about 121 kilometers/hour or 121,000 meters/hour or about 33.6 m/s
Therefore,
Equation (1) @ 75mph is: KE = ½ x 13,608 kg x (33.6 m/s)-squared = 7,681,443 Joules
Now at 62 mph (about 100 km/hr or 100,000 meters/hr or about 27.8 m/s), which seems to be the sweet spot for good fuel consumption on our coaches, the KE would be thus:
Equation (2) @ 62mph is: KE = ½ x 13,608 kg x (27.8 m/s)-squared = 5,258,403 Joules
Thus, the two KE results compare in this way:
At 75 mph, equation (1) is about 1.46 times as much KE as equation (2) is at 62 mph. For the moving motor home to come to a stop, this KE has to be dissipated in some way (friction, heat, vehicle damage, etc).
Note: I ignored the toad in this discussion.
|
NICE, SOMEONE WHO LOVES MATH LIKE I DO! LOL
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 11:35 PM
|
#42
|
Senior Member
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Spokane, Washington
Posts: 1,167
|
Something I have been concerned with since first owing the motorhome, is the possibility of all the loose items in a motorhome flying through the air in the event of the MH leaving the road, or in the event of a roll-over.
We have a free-standing dining table that tips up against the sofa when braking hard. That has happened twice in the last couple of weeks. We have loose dining chairs...Many times we have utensiles in the sink and the coffe maker on the kitchen counter. This has always bothered me. I think it is time to have a plan to stow loose items before taking to the road.
Reading about an accident such as this wakes us up to the reality that MH's do have accidents.
__________________
Ron... WB7DJV
2000 38' Dutch Star | 2006 Grand Cherokee | SilverLeaf VmsPc Engine Monitor | TST TPMS
FMCA, NKK
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
good or bad CG forum
|
MARANATHA |
Camping Locations, Plans & Trip Reports |
5 |
05-24-2009 10:39 AM |
Bad Plug Wires
|
Rocket Heart |
Winnebago Industries Owner's Forum |
9 |
04-22-2009 11:41 AM |
refrigerator water tastes bad
|
Melorene |
Alpine Coach Owner's Forum |
9 |
09-20-2008 03:38 AM |
Master Cylinder Bad?
|
Tom Norman |
MH-General Discussions & Problems |
6 |
01-25-2006 02:51 PM |
Bad Battery
|
Chugman |
Winnebago Industries Owner's Forum |
4 |
11-18-2005 01:02 PM |
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|