I had a 510 I replaced it with a dometic 320. I found several reports of the base and bowl of the 310 separating. The 320 I found is bolted. Its possible on newer 310s they started bolting them. You can tell by tipping it upside down. Had I known I would have gone with a 310 but my husband says the extra real estate on a long bowl when sitting while underway is nice....If you know what I mean.
So the reason I didn't rebuild the 510 was the design of the pedestal and bowl connection and possibility for it to leak unknown like it had been. there were complaints that replacing the seals and parts were not fixing the issue. Plus all the parts I needed including the flapper ball and pieces parts were adding up quickly.
The design of the waste chute down into the toilet flange is much better on the dometic 320 because it extends past the top of the flange 1/2=1" into the opening to help prevent the other issue I had with the 510 which was leaking at the flange after it had been replaced. Also the base on the 320 is longer from front to back and more stable.
I had to use the adapter. The original flange was a hot mess and not usable. It was glued in and I couldn't get it free. On the 320 if you raise the flange you have to raise the base or the toilet won't sit right.
why not a thetford? I wasn't impressed with the flushing system and saw toilets that had a hard time getting water all the way around the bowl by shooting it from the one side. Plus the dometic uses way less water to cover the entire bowl.
Ill post pics from my phone using the app later.