|
|
06-28-2016, 01:13 PM
|
#15
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 43
|
That's because you have a Winnebago. They do build a great MH. The Precept length is too long for the wheel base.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
06-28-2016, 01:51 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Motor City, Mich
Posts: 3,369
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by precept
That's because you have a Winnebago.
|
It's not the Winnebago badges making it drive better. Mine is on a 20,500 GVWR F53 where yours is a 18,000. Not a lot of differences between them, but springs (the big difference) certainly affect how it drives. I can't say that I've seen your weights, what does yours weigh? If it's 2500 pounds lighter than mine (I'm near GVWR fully loaded), the springs ought not to have a big difference in how they drive, being that they are sized for the weight.
__________________
Tim.
|
|
|
06-28-2016, 03:20 PM
|
#17
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by precept
My last conversation with Jayco CS Randy Wes(?) last week, he had informed me that Jayco will not do any repairs regarding the ride and stability of my unit. He is dead set on the information from Ford that to him the chassis is fine (but the Ford mechanic stated in writing the wheel base was too short and that's what's causing the swaying and rough ride), Jayco has refused to help with the amount to install additional "safety" features and it appears that we are now stuck on hold as what to do now. My dealership kept saying they would help, but when $$ is mentioned there's a long pause and then NO. Still waiting to hear from them regarding an appointment to fix the "warranty" problems. Not. Loose seems around front windows and window above door, again. These have all been replaced once a few months ago, and it still is a major headache.
I would like to ask those of you who have this Model to send me a note as to what your issues have been. Mr. Randy at Jayco told me that he has not had any complaints regarding this unit (2015) and that the foundation of this unit is strong and safe!!!
|
I have a 2015 Precept 31 UL. I have has multiple problems with this unit which I've been addressing for the past year. Too much to list here, but they did fix the window over the door by putting a rubber molding on the inside. I've been very disappointed in the fact the quality was not as the dealer told me it was for Jayco. I do love the floor plan and options. Storage is great. Dash supports are ineffective which causes significant rattles. Storage compartments started separating from the side walls, The dealer has tried very hard to fix most of the issues but Jayco customer service has proved to be useless. As for the ride and drive, yes I have the same issues and it seems I'll have to fix on my own based on what you have said.
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 08:08 AM
|
#18
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 43
|
File a complaint with the BBB. I have and am waiting for responses. Our window over the door had the same issue. They claim it was fixed, but it still makes noise. Our list of issues sounds about as long as yours. The more people we can get to complain, the better effect. Did you know that the 2017 Precept 31UL has larger tires and is on a 22,000lb. chassis? Interesting.
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 08:12 AM
|
#19
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 43
|
We had our unit weighed at a CAT scale. The total weight is 18,000lbs. Just being the two of us we don't have a lot to store. The back weight limit is 11,000lbs. and it weighed in at 10,080. I weigh around 120 so that would put us over the legal limit if I were to sit on the bed while on the road. The wheel base is too short for the length of this unit. Jayco has not updated this with new larger tires and a 22,000lb. chassis.
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 02:30 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by precept
The back weight limit is 11,000lbs. and it weighed in at 10,080. I weigh around 120 so that would put us over the legal limit if I were to sit on the bed while on the road.
|
Using your numbers you would have to weigh over 920 lbs to exceed the rear axle rating.
Steve
|
|
|
06-30-2016, 09:30 AM
|
#21
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 43
|
SteveL, you are correct with that figure. I entered it wrong and it is suppose to be 10,800lbs. The heat down here is affecting everyone.
|
|
|
07-01-2016, 07:11 PM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 600
|
We saw a 2017 ul31 today, our dealer just received it. It does have 22.5" tires, the wheelbase did not change. Didn't go in but we could see the movie recliners, and the two tone diamond vinyl (I didn't like but my DW did).
Steve
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 07:51 AM
|
#23
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevL
We saw a 2017 ul31 today, our dealer just received it. It does have 22.5" tires, the wheelbase did not change. Didn't go in but we could see the movie recliners, and the two tone diamond vinyl (I didn't like but my DW did).
Steve
|
I'm curious. Ford specs for the 22,000lb chassis show a 228" wheelbase and 22.5" tires.
The 2016 and earlier had the 18,000lb 190" wheelbase and the smaller tires
Something doesn't sound right. Unless the Ford Chassis specs have changed.
I have a few MSRP sheets from a dealer that show the 2017 has a 228" wheelbase.
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 09:30 AM
|
#24
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 43
|
That's because Jayco has realized the chassis was not strong enough to support the overall weight. Though they claim I am the only one to ever complain about the overall ride, as you can see many people have had the same problems. Thor just bought out Jayco and claims that Jayco's trailers, Class C and Class A "Diesel" products are very good. In the press release there was no mention of the Class A Gas motorhomes for Jayco. So what do you think is the future for the Class A Gas motorhomes?
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 01:00 PM
|
#25
|
Senior Member
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlaBound
I'm curious. Ford specs for the 22,000lb chassis show a 228" wheelbase and 22.5" tires.
The 2016 and earlier had the 18,000lb 190" wheelbase and the smaller tires
Something doesn't sound right. Unless the Ford Chassis specs have changed.
I have a few MSRP sheets from a dealer that show the 2017 has a 228" wheelbase.
|
I didn't pull out a tape measure, my shoes are almost a foot (slightly over), I paced off just over 15 steps, same as my 2016.
Steve
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 04:34 PM
|
#26
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevL
I didn't pull out a tape measure, my shoes are almost a foot (slightly over), I paced off just over 15 steps, same as my 2016.
Steve
|
I intend to have a tape measure, when I take delivery of the 2017.
If it ain't 228", the dealers got sum splainin to do.
|
|
|
07-06-2016, 03:23 PM
|
#27
|
Senior Member
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 600
|
Went back and looked at the 2017 31UL, it does have 22.5" tires, it does have a 22k gross weight, and it does have a 190" wheelbase.
See attached photos.
I'm thinking the tire size alone has made the gross weight go up..... then I had a thought, is the exterior length the same? I'm not sure if that changed.
I like:
The vinyl floor through the bedroom and under the kitchen table.
The new sliding door separating the bedroom.
The 22.5" tires.
The movie recliners.
The passenger side of the dash.
The stainless sinks.
I dislike:
The uncovered control area for slides, generator, etc.
The diamond upholstery, that has been used in boats for years.
The new end tables beside the bed, going to be more difficult to get out.
Wasn't crazy about the interior color (DW liked it).
Steve
|
|
|
07-06-2016, 05:35 PM
|
#28
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 412
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevL
......it does have a 22k gross weight, and it does have a 190" wheelbase.
See attached photos.
|
The Ford sticker photo shows a 22K chassis with a 228 WB. The 2016 F53 22K chassis is available on 3 WB's: 208.3 228.3 242.3.
ref: https://www.fleet.ford.com/truckbbas...16_F53_F59.pdf
Precept if you look on the Ford Chassis forum you will see many posts regarding poor handling. The problem is industry wide. To save $$, coach manufacturer's build on the cheapest (lightest) chassis they can get away with. Until sales are affected there will be no changes to this practice.
There are many solutions discussed on the Ford Chassis forum.
On my Winnebago 31KE (18K chassis, 190" WB) I have done the "cheap handling fix" (CHF) and installed a rear track bar that I made myself. Total cost was less than $100. This changed the handling from unsafe to acceptable.
__________________
2023 Grand Design Trancend Xplor 240ML
2004 Phoenix Cruiser 2551
2014 Winnebago Vista 31KE
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|