Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > THE CHASSIS CLUB FORUMS > Workhorse and Chevrolet Chassis Motorhome Forum
Click Here to Login
Register FilesVendors Registry Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Closed Thread
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 08-02-2012, 03:12 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
deputydog's Avatar
 
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Gainesville FL
Posts: 358
Bosch Brakes strike again - do I hear an echo?

Wow does this sound familar! Sounds like Daimler is a bit more agressive in fixing their problem than what I experienced.

Daimler Trucks North America has recalled some model years 2005 through 2012 Freightliner custom chassis incomplete motor home chassis due to a problem with the brakes, according to a release from the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration.
The recalled Freightliners were manufactured from March 18, 2005, through July 19, 2011, and came equipped with Bosch hydraulic disc brakes.
The chassis equipped with hydraulic brakes could experience diametrical brake caliper piston growth as well as reduced piston to bore clearance if the vehicles goes for long periods of time without driving. If that happens, the system could potentially have brake drag and overheating that could result in a reduction of brake performance and possibly a crash.
The recall potentially affects 2,287 units.
Daimler Trucks says it will notify owners, and dealers for the company will repair the vehicles for free. The safety recall should begin by July 20. Anyone with questions about the recall can call 1-800-547-0712.
__________________
Deputydog
2005 34' Allegro Bay W22/8.1L
Tiffin Coach Owner's Forum Member
deputydog is offline  
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-02-2012, 04:15 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
edgray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Madison, MS
Posts: 10,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by deputydog View Post
Wow does this sound familar! Sounds like Daimler is a bit more agressive in fixing their problem than what I experienced. .....
YES, It is much easier for FCCC to get BOSCH to recognize the problem, since it has already been "discovered" by NHTSA and Workhorse. IOW, "they" don't need to re-invent that wheel.....
edgray is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 08:03 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
UFO Pilot's Avatar
 
Winnebago Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 6,401
If Daimler is more aggressive, why didn't they start their recall when Workhorse started theirs??? Seems to me they are more than a little late, when the problem and the solution was identified quite a while ago.
__________________
Wayne & Roberta

08 Winnebago Destination 39W Gas UFO Workhorse Chassis......It's really weird being the same age as old people. I thought getting old would take much longer.
UFO Pilot is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 08:48 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
deputydog's Avatar
 
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Gainesville FL
Posts: 358
By being more agressive my point was that WH on two separate occasions refused to replace two of my calipers after they locked up because I caught them in time (smelled them heating up and pulled over until they released). They said they weren't locked up at the time I took it in - Duhhhh...

I got the following answers from WH:

"it's because you don't drive it regularly (I drive it a minimum of once a week)
"It's because the linkage shaft is not properly lubricated" (mine had a zerk and it was greased)
"It's because you didn't change the brake fluid on a regular basis (I have corporate 4WD vehicles that are driven under water fairly regularly (one is a 1976 and it has NEVER had the fluid changed or flushed and never a locked caliper and it sits for weeks and sometimes months at a time)
"it's because you ride the brakes (I have a CDL, have been a volunteer MCI bus driver for years and am an Airline Transport rated pilot - if you ride the brakes on an aircraft you have real issues)

Out of frustration I finally paid over $1,000 to have mine replaced (WH finally agreed to pay for two) with the still defective ones so I could at least use my RV until they came up with a fix. Only several months after I paid for those did WH/Bosch admit they had a defective product and replaced the few months old ones with the new designed ones.

Daimler is saying they will replace them - plain and simple - seems a more agressive approach to keep happy customers.
__________________
Deputydog
2005 34' Allegro Bay W22/8.1L
Tiffin Coach Owner's Forum Member
deputydog is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 10:10 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
max49's Avatar
 
Damon Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Forest River Owners Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 3,251
I think Navistar knew they and WH were finished with the RV industry and knew there was no incentive to keep customers happy. They knew there would be no repeat business regardless and the brake recall just made the newly acquired WH a big liability.
I always thought Navistar should know how to build or buy another gas engine since they build diesel engines, but in hindsight, they already had plenty of problems getting their diesel engines approved.
I still think it's a damn shame that WH nor Navistar could even begin to keep Ford honest, much less, compete with them.
It seems Navistar competed better suing in court than in the marketplace for quite awhile but that luck seems to be running out also.
I believe the bottom line is, WH could not afford the recall and Navistar either could'nt either or they figured their reputation would'nt be hurt by their newly acquired red headed stepchild , Workhorse problem. Fortunately, Bosch finally came through.
I like my MH and god knows, I hope for the best with it, but I can't see how any one can keep defending the chassis builder after they sold out to Nav. who could care less about us previous customers.
__________________
Max49
2018 Forest River Georgetown F-53
'08 Jeep Wrangler Toad
Denver, Colorado
max49 is offline  
Old 08-03-2012, 06:55 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Oemtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jarrell, TX 76537
Posts: 4,501
Send a message via AIM to Oemtech
Workhorse didn't do anything about the brake problem other than make excuses due to the "total cost" of the recall. Workhorse/Bosch didn't step up to the plate until then had to. The Feds forced their hand and Workhorse/Bosch did a "voluntary recall" that took dang near 2 more years to complete. But even then it was only a caliper replacement... no pads, no rotors and not even a brake fluid flush, top off only.
__________________
Dale
AKA - Oemy
Oemtech is offline  
Old 08-03-2012, 08:49 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
wa8yxm's Avatar
 
Damon Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO Pilot View Post
If Daimler is more aggressive, why didn't they start their recall when Workhorse started theirs??? Seems to me they are more than a little late, when the problem and the solution was identified quite a while ago.
Great question.

Workhorse, at first, looked and looked for lower cost answers, And in some cases they found them. But finally they had to admit the BOSCH brakes were the issue..

What I do not understand is why Workhorse is the one replacign them, Shouldn't it be Bosch, I mean they built the defective part, adn the replacement as well.

My question is why Freightliner did not come out with the recall like the day after Workhorse issued theirs.
__________________
Home is where I park it!
wa8yxm is offline  
Old 08-03-2012, 09:31 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
max49's Avatar
 
Damon Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Forest River Owners Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 3,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by wa8yxm View Post
Great question.

Workhorse, at first, looked and looked for lower cost answers, And in some cases they found them. But finally they had to admit the BOSCH brakes were the issue..

What I do not understand is why Workhorse is the one replacign them, Shouldn't it be Bosch, I mean they built the defective part, adn the replacement as well.

My question is why Freightliner did not come out with the recall like the day after Workhorse issued theirs.

It was a WH chassis, they chose to buy the brakes from Bosch, they could have chose to put a different brand of brakes on and be pro active but they chose to do nothing unless Bosch came up with an answer.
I believe at the time prior to the recall , the problems were only with WH chassis and I don't think Freightliner was listed on the recall. At least it appears that Freightliner is not going to make the NTSA go through a 2 yr process of officially ordering them to recall their affected vehicles.
I doubt WH could have afforded the recall even if they wanted to and probably did'nt have insurance to cover it either.
I really don't understand why , Winnebago, Thor, Fleetwoood and other Brands just get a "Free Pass" and were not held one bit responsible. But they may may have learned from it because they sure did'nt build many houses on WH chassis's after that.
__________________
Max49
2018 Forest River Georgetown F-53
'08 Jeep Wrangler Toad
Denver, Colorado
max49 is offline  
Old 08-06-2012, 03:10 PM   #9
Moderator Emeritus
 
DriVer's Avatar
 
Winnebago Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Coastal Campers
Carolina Campers
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conway, SC
Posts: 23,641
Blog Entries: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by deputydog View Post
Daimler is saying they will replace them - plain and simple - seems a more aggressive approach to keep happy customers.
it's exponentially easy for them to say that NOW in hindsight when all the leg work has already been accomplished by Workhorse/Bosch & NHTSA.

Daimler today has the advantage of advance notice that a problem with the caliper exists since Bosch TOLD them that the caliper is defective. NHTSA over saw the interaction between supplier the OEM and the customer.

A caliper has been engineered as a result of some 5 years of investigation and preliminary work. The supply chain is now full of replacement calipers.

There is no guess work on the part of Daimler therefore the language that they are using is appropriate to resolve the problem and I don't see them as having proactivly jumped through hoops to make any of this happen.

They are just the beneficiary of the work that has already been done.
__________________
03 Adventurer 38G, Workhorse W22
F&R Track Bars, Safety+ , Ultrapower, Taylor Extremes, SGII
TST 507, Blue Ox, SMI, Koni FSD, CrossFire
RV/MH Hall of Fame - Lifetime Member
DriVer is offline  
Old 08-06-2012, 03:33 PM   #10
Moderator Emeritus
 
DriVer's Avatar
 
Winnebago Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Coastal Campers
Carolina Campers
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conway, SC
Posts: 23,641
Blog Entries: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by oemtech View Post
But even then it was only a caliper replacement... no pads, no rotors and not even a brake fluid flush, top off only.
Dale, If you find out if Freightliner is going to replace all the pads, calipers, ABS sensors and rotors on their recalled vehicles please let us know.

In regard to fluids, the way one shop did it was different from another. My shop vacuumed out the booster tank and bled out the calipers. This is one more step than just the top off you claim. Other quality dealers like Brazels and Redlands (& many others) completely flushed out the systems.

You know Dale, some one could give you a 20K Gold shovel to continue to bury Workhorse but I expect that would not be enough.
__________________
03 Adventurer 38G, Workhorse W22
F&R Track Bars, Safety+ , Ultrapower, Taylor Extremes, SGII
TST 507, Blue Ox, SMI, Koni FSD, CrossFire
RV/MH Hall of Fame - Lifetime Member
DriVer is offline  
Old 08-06-2012, 04:15 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mcdonough, Ga.
Posts: 5,932
Quote:
Originally Posted by wa8yxm View Post
Great question.

Workhorse, at first, looked and looked for lower cost answers, And in some cases they found them. But finally they had to admit the BOSCH brakes were the issue..

What I do not understand is why Workhorse is the one replacign them, Shouldn't it be Bosch, I mean they built the defective part, adn the replacement as well.

My question is why Freightliner did not come out with the recall like the day after Workhorse issued theirs.
I remember back in the sixties when Sears Silvertone TV's were a piece of junk. They were made by RCA and sears blamed RCA for the problems. Come to find out, Sears had come to RCA and brought the plans for the TV's. They were crap because Sears had specified low cost parts and cheap chassis. I don't know the facts, but its a possibility WH drew up the specs and only had Bosch manuf. them to their specs. If Bosch designed and handled all the manuf. process, they should stand behind their product. If they only manuf. the brakes to WH's spec., I can see why they would not stand behind them.
__________________
1998 Pace Arrow 35 ft. F53 Ford V10 2014 Honda CRV toad
32 years mechanic at Delta Air Lines 15 year motorhome service manager. 3 popups....2 travel trailers....5 motorhomes....loved them all.
ga traveler is offline  
Old 08-06-2012, 05:09 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Spoonman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dalton Ma/Crystal River Fl
Posts: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by DriVer View Post
it's exponentially easy for them to say that NOW in hindsight when all the leg work has already been accomplished by Workhorse/Bosch & NHTSA.

Daimler today has the advantage of advance notice that a problem with the caliper exists since Bosch TOLD them that the caliper is defective. NHTSA over saw the interaction between supplier the OEM and the customer.

A caliper has been engineered as a result of some 5 years of investigation and preliminary work. The supply chain is now full of replacement calipers.

There is no guess work on the part of Daimler therefore the language that they are using is appropriate to resolve the problem and I don't see them as having proactivly jumped through hoops to make any of this happen.

They are just the beneficiary of the work that has already been done.
Now that is a joke! Workhorse and Bosch did nothing but deny there was a problem until chassis owners bombarded the NHTSA complaints and evidence of defects.
The govt dragged Workhorse into this kicking and screaming that it was anything but the brakes.
Spoonman is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 06:59 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Oemtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jarrell, TX 76537
Posts: 4,501
Send a message via AIM to Oemtech
Quote:
Originally Posted by DriVer View Post
Dale, If you find out if Freightliner is going to replace all the pads, calipers, ABS sensors and rotors on their recalled vehicles please let us know.
Let's see now.... Seized calipers, glaze the pads and warp the rotors and all you get is new calipers. Wrong answer.... You fixed what is broke.

Quote:
In regard to fluids, the way one shop did it was different from another. My shop vacuumed out the booster tank and bled out the calipers. This is one more step than just the top off you claim. Other quality dealers like Brazels and Redlands (& many others) completely flushed out the systems.
Lot's of shops did a complete flush and brake bleed as they know how to do a proper brake job. But, who/whom paid for this extra work? Probably the customer. But, Workhorse only provided enough fluid to top off. They also did not provide warranty time for bleeding the brakes, this according to the shop that did mine. But, for an extra $1,500 you got get pads & rotors.

Quote:
You know Dale, some one could give you a 20K Gold shovel to continue to bury Workhorse but I expect that would not be enough.
I don't have to bury Workhorse they did it themselves and if I did get a shovel I would melt it down for the gold.
__________________
Dale
AKA - Oemy
Oemtech is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 07:10 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Oemtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jarrell, TX 76537
Posts: 4,501
Send a message via AIM to Oemtech
Quote:
Originally Posted by DriVer View Post
it's exponentially easy for them to say that NOW in hindsight when all the leg work has already been accomplished by Workhorse/Bosch & NHTSA.

Daimler today has the advantage of advance notice that a problem with the caliper exists since Bosch TOLD them that the caliper is defective. NHTSA over saw the interaction between supplier the OEM and the customer.

A caliper has been engineered as a result of some 5 years of investigation and preliminary work. The supply chain is now full of replacement calipers.

There is no guess work on the part of Daimler therefore the language that they are using is appropriate to resolve the problem and I don't see them as having proactivly jumped through hoops to make any of this happen.

They are just the beneficiary of the work that has already been done.
BS - The caliper pistons were fitted poorly, not enough clearance and used the light duty phenolic coating.

IIRC there are on 2 OEMS of phenolic coatings in the US and only 2 approved coating formulas. Bosch/Workhorse choose the light duty version on the first go around and the heavy duty version on the second go around. I believe I documented this with links to the OEMS and PDF's of the coating formulas back in the Workhorse brake thread.
__________________
Dale
AKA - Oemy
Oemtech is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
bosch, brakes



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.