|
|
08-11-2005, 03:41 PM
|
#1
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 24
|
I'm going to Colorado and Utah in a couple of weeks, and, as I recall, the regular gasoline sold in stations there is only 85 octane. Does the Vortec engine do alright with the 85 octane, or do I have to buy the mid-grade there, which is usually 87?
__________________
Golferdhm
05 Allegro Bay with Workhorse
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
08-11-2005, 03:41 PM
|
#2
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 24
|
I'm going to Colorado and Utah in a couple of weeks, and, as I recall, the regular gasoline sold in stations there is only 85 octane. Does the Vortec engine do alright with the 85 octane, or do I have to buy the mid-grade there, which is usually 87?
__________________
Golferdhm
05 Allegro Bay with Workhorse
|
|
|
08-11-2005, 05:13 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Crossville, TN USA
Posts: 1,124
|
I used it no problem that I noticed.
|
|
|
08-11-2005, 05:20 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
National RV Owners Club Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,502
|
I travel through Utah and other 5000' + elev.- states using 85 octane regular with no problem. I try not to have too much of this fuel remaining when I return to lower elevations. Never had pinging/knock or other indications of problems in 30,000 miles.
__________________
2003 34' Dolphin 5342, W22, UP, UPGBrake, F and R Track Bars, Rear IPD sway bar, Koni FSDs, Safe-T-Plus, Scan Gauge II.. 2004 Jeep Liberty, Blue-Ox Adventa..
|
|
|
08-11-2005, 05:44 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Madison, MS
Posts: 10,527
|
M&EM: being from the deep south flatlands below sea level, I'm ignorant about this lower octane gas. Are you saying it is OK to use in our 8.1L Vortec, but only when at higher elevations?? I'm headed up there for Labor Day, and thought I would need the 87 octane minimum.
Please eloborate, if you can help with my confusion. THANKS, ED
|
|
|
08-11-2005, 08:20 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 530
|
I was in the mountains 7,000 plus feet about two months ago pulling up 6 - 8% grades for 17 miles on several occasions and used the 85 octane fuel without any problems or lack of performance at all. I was told at Loves that the only difference was the altitude, meaning the 85 performs the same as the 87 at lower elevations.
Have a great trip, not to worry!
From Paso Robles, Ca. (wine country south)
|
|
|
08-11-2005, 10:07 PM
|
#7
|
Moderator Emeritus
Winnebago Owners Club Workhorse Chassis Owner Coastal Campers Carolina Campers
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conway, SC
Posts: 23,641
|
If you call Workhorse Customer Support they will tell you not to use anything less than 87 octaine. I have seen 85.5 and 86 octaine as regular out West here and I have chosen to use the 88 octaine or mid-grade gasoline if 87 isn't available.
I have had no problems and no regrets.
Quite by accident I did fill up with 91 octaine and let me tell ya pilgrim! .... that Vortec loved it. I swear to Jupiter that I did get better mpg but I'm not ready to pay the extra premium for hi-test.
__________________
03 Adventurer 38G, Workhorse W22
F&R Track Bars, Safety+ , Ultrapower, Taylor Extremes, SGII
TST 507, Blue Ox, SMI, Koni FSD, CrossFire
RV/MH Hall of Fame - Lifetime Member
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 03:23 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: MN,USA
Posts: 651
|
Driver,
You know that all Octane is is the resistance to pinging. Any perceived power increase is a product of other blending. It is possible that the "big oil" has decided to blend with more energy into the higher grades of fuel.
We have noted for years that the MH and 4 wheelers we have driven always work better when we get around Missouri and south. We have tracked the mileage on many trips over the years from MN and can prove this perception is real as far as MPG.
__________________
2004 Itasca Sunrise 36', Workhorse
2003 Suzuki XL7
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 06:02 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
National RV Owners Club Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,502
|
Ed, There are several sources on the internet that describe octane ratings and the effects on engine requirements due to elevation increases. I don't remember any specific sites but just search for octane ratings. The message I got was that engine octane number decreases as altitude increases. At 5000 foot altitudes 85 was considered ok for sea level engine requirements of 87..
__________________
2003 34' Dolphin 5342, W22, UP, UPGBrake, F and R Track Bars, Rear IPD sway bar, Koni FSDs, Safe-T-Plus, Scan Gauge II.. 2004 Jeep Liberty, Blue-Ox Adventa..
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 06:27 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Madison, MS
Posts: 10,527
|
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">but just search for octane ratings </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Now why didn't I think of that?
THANKS, for all of the replys. ED
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 01:54 PM
|
#11
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 24
|
Thanks for all the replies. I think, given the price of gas these days, that when I am over 5000 feet, I'll stick with whatever they call regular. If that is 85 octane, so be it.
__________________
Golferdhm
05 Allegro Bay with Workhorse
|
|
|
08-14-2005, 12:11 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,566
|
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by DriVer:
Quite by accident I did fill up with 91 octaine and let me tell ya pilgrim! .... that Vortec loved it. I swear to Jupiter that I did get better mpg but I'm not ready to pay the extra premium for hi-test. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Pretty much a waste of money using higher octane...you wont notice any power increase...octane is a measure of engine ping....
we use 85 here where we live at 8600 feet elevation....if you buy anything higher at these elevations, you are (again) wasting your hard earned money...
8,600 feet elevation, Colorado
|
|
|
08-14-2005, 05:25 AM
|
#13
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ortonville, MI
Posts: 38
|
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by DSouthw524:
Driver,
You know that all Octane is is the resistance to pinging. Any perceived power increase is a product of other blending. It is possible that the "big oil" has decided to blend with more energy into the higher grades of fuel. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I'm not sure what you mean by "blend with more energy into the higher grades of fuel", but the different grades of gasoline all have the same amount of energy content per gallon. There certainly can be mileage & percieved power gains by using higher octane fuels because most modern engines, including the 8.1L, have knock sensors to detect pre-ignition or "pinging". And just because you aren't hearing any pinging on 87 doesn't mean there isn't some going on and the knock sensor adjusts fuel & spark timing to protect the engine. Using higher octane fuel can eliminate some or all of those operating points and improve performance, if the added cost is worth it to you.
But, the 8.1L's fuel & spark maps are designed for nominal 87 octane fuel and the knock sensor won't magically transpose the maps to maximize the potential performance available with 89 or 91 octane. That would require a chip from an aftermarket supplier and they do their product validation after they have your credit card number.
__________________
Alan King
2005 Chevrolet 2500 HD CC 8.1L/Allison
|
|
|
08-15-2005, 03:30 AM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California Desert
Posts: 357
|
While we didn't have the MH when we lived in SLC (~4200'), we owned two Chevys, a Subaru, a Ford, a Honda, a Nissan, a Suzuki, and a Jeep. All regular gas sold in SLC is 85 octane, and all these engines ran fine on it. Going south from SLC, I think you'll find the regular octane rating goes to 87 in St. George.
__________________
2004 Southwind 32VS
2014 C-Max toad
Workhorse chassis
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|