Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > THE CHASSIS CLUB FORUMS > Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum
Click Here to Login
Register FilesVendors Registry Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-27-2014, 08:30 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 118
Update.
After a quick online search I have found that Hawk makes pads for the F53 chassis.
This is the same company that I have been using for my racecar brakes for 15 years with excellant results.
I ordered a set of the DTC30 compound pads for the front and hope to install them this week. They have a wide operating range and are designed for heavy duty trucks.
Will post a report soon. I do expect to see a major improvement in initial bite and fade resistence.
Hawk makes some really great products.
__________________
2013 Winnebago 35G, CHF, UltraTrac 2, 5 Star Tune.
2005 Jeep Rubicon Unlimited Toad
Rvbuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 09-27-2014, 06:03 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lowell, Arkansas
Posts: 7,303
Rvbuzz,
Good information. Do let us know the outcome. It's always great to get information from those with some experience and knowledge of the subject. Man I'm always ready (even at 70) to learn about new technology.

Thanks,

TeJay
__________________
TeJay Auto Instructor/4-yrs USAF/ Liz: RN/ WBGO 2014 Vista 30T/ F-53/CHF/5-Star/Koni * Bella & Izzy * Golden /Cocker mix/ Louie The Cat* All Retired
TeJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2014, 11:23 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick-B View Post
Buzz,
Don't neglect checking the rear brakes. On a motorhome the brake proportioning is different than a car since the rear is much heavier. Not unusual for the rear pads to wear just as fast or faster than the front.
Yes, rears have double the weight on them compared to the front. You are talking about a dual wheel rear axle that is never really unloaded since it is carrying the bulk of the weight of the house plus or minus 2,000 lbs or so of you and your stuff.
__________________
Neil V
2001 Winnebago Adventurer WFG35U
NeilV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2014, 10:58 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 118
My plan is to Install front pads first just to see what change it makes and if like the direction it is going then will add read pads with same compound.

It makes sense that the rears would get used up at the same rate as fronts.
__________________
2013 Winnebago 35G, CHF, UltraTrac 2, 5 Star Tune.
2005 Jeep Rubicon Unlimited Toad
Rvbuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 04:20 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,886
Some of this seems to come down to "feel". In my experience - high performance pads - ceramics - don't "grab" as well as organic pad until they're hot. This results in a feel that is less than desirable if you like brakes that bite right off the bat...

They do much better under conditions where the rotor is hot, but under normal driving - not great...
cb1000rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 10:14 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 118
The DTC 30 pads have an operating temp range of 100 f -1200 f.
These are considered to be a racing compound but are rotor friendly and supposed to be quiet.
My personal experience with Hawk pads has been good. I have been using them on my racecars for 15 years with no failures of any kind.
At $120 a set they are not cheap. But if the performance is better and has less fade while towing and braking on grades then it is worth it.
__________________
2013 Winnebago 35G, CHF, UltraTrac 2, 5 Star Tune.
2005 Jeep Rubicon Unlimited Toad
Rvbuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2014, 06:42 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rvbuzz View Post
My plan is to Install front pads first just to see what change it makes and if like the direction it is going then will add read pads with same compound.

It makes sense that the rears would get used up at the same rate as fronts.

Actually the rear brakes get used up faster than the fronts. I changed out the pads on our 2001 F53 chassis at 75,000 miles. The front pads still had about 1/3 of the material remaining. The rear pads were paper thin.

The front and rear pads are the same, so if you decide to change the rears first you still have the pads you need.
__________________
Hikerdogs
2013 Adventurer 32H
Hikerdogs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2014, 11:10 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
SteveLevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 1,195
Hate to ask this question... but have the brakes been bled? And possibly, especially since motorhomes stand around, maybe flushing through and replacing the fluid might be the answer...

Steve
__________________
The Green Machine -- 2000 Mountain High Coachworks Summit (Spartan chassis / Cummins ISC)
...and F-Troop: Fearghus, Fiona, and Frankie (Cairn Terriers)
SteveLevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2014, 01:46 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
rodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 778
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveLevin View Post
Hate to ask this question... but have the brakes been bled? And possibly, especially since motorhomes stand around, maybe flushing through and replacing the fluid might be the answer...

Steve
All the new f53 chassis do it. Mine is new and it has the same issue. It will stop on a dime, just takes lots of pedal pressure.
__________________
2009 Ventana 3933
rodz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2014, 03:50 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,968
I don't believe bleeding or flushing the system is going to have any effect on the amount of pedal pressure it takes to stop the motorhome. I installed a Brakemaster 9060 braking system on our 2013 F53 chassis. Part of the installation is removing short section of brake line and Teeing in a proportioning valve. The system was flushed and refilled with DOT 5.1 brake fluid. There's no difference in the pedal pressure required before or after flushing the system.

On another note after driving the motorhome for a few thousand miles you'll get used to the amount of pressure required to stop the vehicle. We have over 16,000 miles on our 2013. Both my wife and I drive it, and have gotten used to the difference between this one and our 2001 F53 chassis
__________________
Hikerdogs
2013 Adventurer 32H
Hikerdogs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2014, 11:38 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 118
I havent bleed or flushed my system but being a 2013 itshould not need it yet.
I can certainly do that before I install pads to see if there is any change. But as has been stated they do work fine if you really get into them.
My wife also drives and we have a little over 10,000 miles on it now. She is ok with the brakes. I personally feel they could be alot better especially at the initial point of applying brakes.
__________________
2013 Winnebago 35G, CHF, UltraTrac 2, 5 Star Tune.
2005 Jeep Rubicon Unlimited Toad
Rvbuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2014, 06:10 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 118
I finally installed the Hawk DTC30 brake pads and there is a noticeable improvement in pedal feel, initial bite and stopping power at lower pedal pressures.

This is what I was looking for and happy with my choice.

That said, the pads do squeal when cold and I suspect that is caused by my not sanding the rotors before installing new pads. I have gotten away with not re-surfacing or sanding with 120 grit that I gave it a try.

I will now have to start all over and properly prepare the rotors :-(

The pads are different for each chassis, meaning that the 26K chassis and 24K chassis do not use the same pads. A couple of the chassis used the same pads but most were weight specific so be sure to look at that if you buy some.

Overall this was the right direction for me. With a higher coefficient pad it is likely that rotor wear will be increased.
__________________
2013 Winnebago 35G, CHF, UltraTrac 2, 5 Star Tune.
2005 Jeep Rubicon Unlimited Toad
Rvbuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2014, 08:49 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
spanuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 151
3 years ago on my 2006 f53 18000#sightseer i changed tires. The rotors were a little rusty and needed a little help with 35000 miles on them. The pads looked great so as i had tires off i used a battery drill with 120 grit disk, with one hand i spun the rotor on the unit and other hand with drill sanded rotors. They looked like new when done only took minutes did not even have to take rotors off .the hawk pads sound like a good way to go NEXT
__________________
2013 vista 35f 22000# road master sway bars blue ox brake & tow bar and chassis rear bar koni shocks safeTplus summo front &rear/2006 Honda element awd auto toad/and best friend (wife) as co pilot
spanuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2014, 09:05 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lowell, Arkansas
Posts: 7,303
I realize that everybody has an opinion regarding rotors and machining. I always try to back up opinions with facts along with common sense and reason. Yes scientific studies would help but that's not my job. Experience has been my teacher over the last 40 years. Some of what I'll post many already know but others may not.

Brakes work because two surfaces rub together and create heat. It's the ability to generate heat that gives the brakes their effectiveness. Also during the burnishing or breaking in process pad material will transfer and embed itself into the rotor. That transfer of material is crucial to the over-all effectiveness of the brakes.

New pads will be flat but used rotors will not be flat. How flat they are in relation to the pad will vary. Exactly how flat your rotors are will affect how well your brakes will work after the burnishing period is complete.

If you do not know or have not done this you should Google "Brake burnishing."

CS (common sense) tells me if the two surfaces designed to rub together are anything less than 100% flat that will reduce my brakes. How much??? That's difficult to tell but any amount in my mind is to much.

CS also tells me that one can not make the rotors flat using a drill and sand paper. Yes you can remove some of the shiny glazed surface. What about the embedded material left from the old brake pads?? Exactly how is that going to affect the new pads??? We don't know.

Here's another point. Cast iron is porous. If you get oil/grease on a drum or rotor it will seep into the cast iron. How much??? Who knows. In my mind any amount is to much. Can it be washed off?? I've been told no.

When a rotor is bolted onto a brake lathe it is mounted exactly as it is mounted onto the axle. The bearings and axle are designed so the rotor spins at right angles to the axis of rotation. I have taken brand new good quality rotors out of the box, mounted them on an accurate (dialed in) lathe and they showed .010 to .020 run-out. If mounted on a vehicle you will have pedal pulsations and an unhappy customer.

Here's something else that I did for students. Mount a rotor on a car with no rim and just using the lug bolts. For now just snug the rotor down. Using a dial indicator check the rotor run-out. Mark the rotor indicating any areas of run-out. Torque all bolts down to say 80 Ft/lbs except one and torque it to only 70 FT/LBS. Re-check the rotor run-out and it will now be warped in a new place based on the un-even torquing. That's an eye-opener.

Have you ever heard of any technician taking 100 grit sand paper on a small disc sander using it to clean the dirt/rust from the area on the backside of the rotor that will mate up against the axle flange??? If you have a chunk of dirt in that area it will cause the rotor to tilt creating an artificial run-out.

We always cleaned the back side of the rotor before mounting. When the machining was finished (rotor still turning on the lathe) we always used the disc sander to create a non-directional finish on both sides of the rotor. The surface finish is critical to rotor burnishing.

At one point in my career I called a machine tool company to try and get some ceramic cutters for our brake lathe. I thought they might last longer. We always used carbide cutters. When I spoke to one of their guys he asked me what I wanted them for so I told him. He said, "That's not a good idea. The surface finish on a cast iron rotor should not be smooth. It needs to maintain a certain amount of roughness so the pads can burnish properly." That made a lot of sense. Remember we are creating friction/heat to convert energy of motion into another form so we can stop the vehicle. Smooth surface and not as much heat generated.

This was always my approach. When performing repairs I'll do everything technically possible to achieve the absolute best possible outcome. Within reason I will avail myself of the latest changes/improvements in technology. I will always be honest with customers nor cut corners in any way shape or form. I owed that approach to my students because I knew they may/would enter the work force and people would depend on them. I sleep well at night also.


Learning never stops,

TeJay
__________________
TeJay Auto Instructor/4-yrs USAF/ Liz: RN/ WBGO 2014 Vista 30T/ F-53/CHF/5-Star/Koni * Bella & Izzy * Golden /Cocker mix/ Louie The Cat* All Retired
TeJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
brake



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reprogramming the Jake Brake Rich-n-Linda Class A Motorhome Discussions 15 04-08-2014 09:23 PM
2014 Chevy Equinox - Brake Light Relay T_Van Toads and Motorhome Related Towing 11 03-29-2014 09:25 PM
Great experience with Brake Buddy!! motraveler Toads and Motorhome Related Towing 6 03-29-2014 06:50 PM
Hydro Max brake - booster activates during normal braking Imdougg Ford Motorhome Chassis Forum 28 01-29-2014 09:28 AM
Brake light trigger for brake controller tompn Monaco Owner's Forum 16 01-08-2014 11:37 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.