Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > MOTORHOME FORUMS > Class A Motorhome Discussions
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-02-2017, 12:51 PM   #43
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by stepside454 View Post
So lower frame rails mean less basement storage , less flat floor area & more opportunity to drag the tail on the ground if there's overhang
Not neccesarily. Ever look how much clearance there is between the axle and the frame rail? Lower height springs would change nothing in the body, except for maybe a couple of wheel wells.
forest is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-02-2017, 01:35 PM   #44
Senior Member
 
stepside454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,740
Clearance is for suspension travel .
Also on a long wheelbase vehicle ground clearance is important for driveway approaches etc
stepside454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2017, 02:01 PM   #45
Senior Member
 
BillJinOR's Avatar
 
Monaco Owners Club
Forest River Owners Club
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,329
Actually I think it short wheelbase gasser ( limit driveline? ) relative to a DP and large rear overhang on gassers that limit drive approaches. Don’t you? Never had a gas coach so I’m just guessing.
__________________
2023 Coachmen Encore 325SS
BillJinOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2017, 02:27 PM   #46
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by stepside454 View Post
Clearance is for suspension travel .
Also on a long wheelbase vehicle ground clearance is important for driveway approaches etc
But they never use all the clearance for the travel available. It would be pretty easy to drop 2". Take a look at the old Winnebago elandans/slanted. Nice a low profile.
forest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2017, 07:26 AM   #47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 8,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarab0088 View Post
Times 1000% too.

The Detriot Chassis -》Ford relationship has always struck me as odd too

Great post
I took a look at the link. They more or less tell you the deal. It kept the line from going to Mexico or brought it back from there. Not clear which. As a separate vendor they probably avoided the UAW plus the Ford pension and management overhead. They specialize in *low volume* production. Not enough for Ford to crank up a big assembly line for. I doubt they can engineer a totally new suspension or a drivetrain but Ford can if it needs to. OTOH they can change the frame rail lengths to order as well as some other minor changes in low volumes so the various RV chassis buyers can get some of what they want, keep it American made, and keep shipping distances down to a lot closer than Mexico to Indiana. Looks like a good deal for the owners and Ford.

In retrospect I might be wrong about the suspension. I have seen modeling of sport car suspensions by race teams so the software may be out there at reasonable prices for them to do trucks and other vehicles.
nothermark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2017, 11:15 AM   #48
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 413
Nice bickering back and forth, but I believe that the 366 ci engine is too small to haul around even 14,000 pounds, let alone 19,000. Remember there is no substitute for cubic inches....., be gas or diesel.
wildmanbaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2017, 02:29 PM   #49
Moderator Emeritus
 
Gary RVRoamer's Avatar


 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: West Palm Beach, FL. USA
Posts: 27,676
Quote:
but I believe that the 366 ci engine is too small to haul around even 14,000 pounds, let alone 19,000. Remember there is no substitute for cubic inches....., be gas or diesel.
So all those rigs with a 5.9L Cummins or Cat 3126's are no good then?

The main drawback with a smaller cube gas engine is the need to rev it up a bit to get the horsepower needed for the job. The GM 6.0L makes 367 hp, but you have to crank 5400 rpms to get it. A bigger block engine like the GM 8.1L produces similar horses at around 4200. And The Cummins 5.9L diesel can do it at about 2900.
__________________
Gary Brinck
Former owner of 2004 American Tradition and several other RVs
Home is West Palm Beach, FL
Gary RVRoamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2017, 02:51 PM   #50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary RVRoamer View Post
So all those rigs with a 5.9L Cummins or Cat 3126's are no good then?

The main drawback with a smaller cube gas engine is the need to rev it up a bit to get the horsepower needed for the job. The GM 6.0L makes 367 hp, but you have to crank 5400 rpms to get it. A bigger block engine like the GM 8.1L produces similar horses at around 4200. And The Cummins 5.9L diesel can do it at about 2900.
Come on Gary, comparing diesel, with a turbo, to gas is not fair. The torque and Hp curves are completely different. Is the Cummins 5.9 equal to the M12? The C7 equal to the C9? To get back to the original comment, the 6.0 does not have enough torque either. You know torque is what gets you moving, hp is the total amount of work can be done. I know, I know, you can make a washing machine motor pull a freight train, but at what speed?
wildmanbaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2017, 02:58 PM   #51
Moderator Emeritus
 
Scarab0088's Avatar


 
Damon Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lone Star State
Posts: 19,203
This is the progression of engine technology...

Please notice the Detroit Diesel has already signed with Freightliner for this engine in there M2 line commercial trucks.
https://demanddetroit.com/engines/dd5
__________________
Kim and Steve, Mustang LCDR (USCG Ret), Outlaw #1193
https://www.irv2.com/attachments/signaturepics/sigpic84535_7.gif
WE LOVE OUR OUTLAW RV
Scarab0088 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
chassis, fccc, gas



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCCC Introduces New MC-L RV Chassis DriVer RV Industry Press 1 12-06-2009 03:48 PM
Fifty Motorhome Models are Riding on FCCC Chassis at the 2009 National RV Trade Show DriVer RV Industry Press 1 12-03-2008 03:29 PM
FCCC 2008 Engine/Chassis Information vicsryd Freightliner Motorhome Chassis Forum 2 05-24-2007 06:24 PM
Tiffin / FCCC FRED chassis-update edgray Class A Motorhome Discussions 15 09-08-2005 09:23 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.