Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > MOTORHOME FORUMS > Class A Motorhome Discussions
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-28-2013, 07:48 AM   #29
AdvntureCats's Avatar
Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 83
There are a couple of reasons why manufacturers may not recommend anything below 85 octane.

One, as already stated, fuel economy will go down. That doesn't matter much to you or I on one leg of a long-distance trip; it will tend to average out and most of us in RV's aren't worried about hypermiling anyway. But if everybody in average sedans runs the low-octane fuel and gets reduced mileage, they'll also burn more tons of hydrocarbons and produce more cumulative emissions -- which messes up the EPA expected calculations that the automakers have to meet. So the warning is to protect the automakers' bottom line, not you.

Second, and related to emissions, running lower octane and at reduced timing can change the overall emission characteristics of the engine. It is possible that some components of the emission control system could have a shorter lifespan if low octane fuel is used continuously over a long time. It may not harm the engine, but it may eventually fail an emission test sooner, resulting in a service bill if you have to replace emissions parts. If it happens under the warranty period and the shop finds out it's due to low octane fuel, they probably won't cover the repair. But putting in a tank or two of 85 instead of 87 on a trip isn't likely to have any significant impact.
Eric & Holly + 2 kitties from New Hampshire
1992 Winnebago Adventurer 32'
AdvntureCats is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free! RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 07-28-2013, 08:35 AM   #30
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,526
Originally Posted by Clifftall View Post
The Eisenhower Tunnel in the Rockies is over 11,000.
Yes most, perhaps all, elevations in the lower 48 above 10,000 ft are in the rockies. Was just wondering where these roads were. Suspect most are in Colorado.
Libero is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.