 |
10-02-2016, 08:33 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 512
|
Ride height setting?
What determines the proper height setting for the ride height adjustment?
I think a setting which makes the body to tire gaps equal for both axles makes sense.
|
|
|
 |
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
10-02-2016, 08:43 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 4,296
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve11669
What determines the proper height setting for the ride height adjustment?
I think a setting which makes the body to tire gaps equal for both axles makes sense.
|
It's determined by the chassis mfg. They want the drive shaft angle in relationship to the transmission to be within spec. If it's out of spec, the angle will cause excessive force on the drive link joints. If it's set correctly, the tire/body gap should be the same on each axle, but don't set your ride height based on the gap you want.
__________________
Bill & Brigitte
06 Windsor PEQ, Cummins 400 ISL
2014 Honda CRV or 2012 Jeep
|
|
|
10-02-2016, 08:43 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: LA, Lower Alabama
Posts: 2,430
|
It's a bit more specific than that. For each chassis there will be a location, usually at the shock absorber, to measure the ride height. Actual location and height will vary. The adjustments are made with the ride height valve IAW the chassis manufacturers specifications. Mine has 3 adjustments. The front sets the front ride height. The rear 2 set rear ride height and left/right height.
|
|
|
10-02-2016, 09:55 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, California
Posts: 954
|
__________________
2003 Country Coach Intrigue 36'
Cummins ISL 400
|
|
|
10-02-2016, 10:29 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Lake Havasu City, AZ & Plover, WI
Posts: 5,895
|
As mentioned, each manufacturer has specs for each configuration. The primary purpose might be to maintain the proper driveline angle, however, they can also be used to help balance the load. The specification has a range of acceptable adjustment. My coach was heavy on the front right and rear left when compared to the opposite sides. The settings were within specs. When the left rear was adjusted down only 3/8", the front was within 100# of each other and it was still within specs. The excess weight was transferred to the left front and right rear. I was told by Tiffin that I could adjust the ride height valves anywhere within their specs to improve the weight distribution. It's a simple way to get a good balance of a loaded coach. Mine has four valves, but others use only one valve in the rear for a total of three. I'm not sure how they would work.
__________________
2013 43 QGP Allegro Bus ( SOLD )
2013 Avalanche
2000 AEV TJ
|
|
|
10-02-2016, 05:16 PM
|
#6
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: West Palm Beach, FL. USA
Posts: 26,268
|
Quote:
The primary purpose might be to maintain the proper driveline angle, however, they can also be used to help balance the load.
|
The ride height control valves automatically compensate for imbalanced loads. That's the whole idea. If one corner of the chassis begins to get low, the ride height control valve on that side opens to let more air into the suspension to raise it up and keep the height constant.
__________________
Gary Brinck
Former owner of 2004 American Tradition and several other RVs
Home is West Palm Beach, FL
|
|
|
10-02-2016, 06:37 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Snowbird - Waterford Mi and Citrus Springs Fl.
Posts: 3,609
|
There's so many variables here, I don't know how you could make many generalized statements.
For starters, the are 4 valve systems, with a valve controlling each corner. Then there are 3 valve systems. The 3 valve system might have 2 in the front and 1 in back, or it might have 2 in the back and 1 in the front.
Measurements from the wheel well to tire are NEVER used. It's always (to my knowledge anyway) from a suspension component to a frame component. Even then, care must be taken to assure the coach is not parked over uneven ground.
If there's one general statement I'd make, it would be about the rear adjustment(s) being set to maintain drive line angle.
After that you get into a can of worms with all the other variables.
__________________
1997 37' HR Endeavor, 275hp Cat, Freightliner
03 CR-V Blue Ox, Ready Brake
|
|
|
10-02-2016, 08:54 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Lake Havasu City, AZ & Plover, WI
Posts: 5,895
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary RVRoamer
The ride height control valves automatically compensate for imbalanced loads. That's the whole idea. If one corner of the chassis begins to get low, the ride height control valve on that side opens to let more air into the suspension to raise it up and keep the height constant.
|
The ride height valves will keep the body of the coach at a set position regardless of the load put into the coach. That's what they do, but they will not compensate for imbalance. If they are not adjusted correctly, you could have a situation like I had. The coach appeared to be level front to rear and side to side. The front axle weighed 15,400# which was 200# under the max rating. However, the front right corner was at 8200# and the front left corner was 7200#. Not good since the tires were rated for 7860# each. After adjusting the left rear valve down 3/8", the FR was 7700# and the FL was about the same. The coach still appears level front to rear and side to side. Since then, I have adjusted the tag pressures so that the steer axle weighs 14,600 with each side being close to 7300#. I am one of many who have discovered this same issue and have corrected it with proper adjustment.
__________________
2013 43 QGP Allegro Bus ( SOLD )
2013 Avalanche
2000 AEV TJ
|
|
|
10-02-2016, 09:04 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Country Coach Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7,248
|
PM sent
__________________
Don
2002 Country Coach Intrigue
|
|
|
10-02-2016, 09:07 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Country Coach Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7,248
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TR4
|
Bill, this linky no worky for me.
__________________
Don
2002 Country Coach Intrigue
|
|
|
10-03-2016, 08:03 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, California
Posts: 954
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dons2346
Bill, this linky no worky for me.
|
Don, try this one
__________________
2003 Country Coach Intrigue 36'
Cummins ISL 400
|
|
|
10-03-2016, 09:25 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Country Coach Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7,248
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TR4
Don, try this one
|
That is the same one I sent to Steve
__________________
Don
2002 Country Coach Intrigue
|
|
|
 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|