|
|
02-06-2020, 10:51 AM
|
#1
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 18
|
RV Shopping: Ford VS GM
Hello! I'm new here so please have grace if this isn't the correct sub-forum for this.
My wife and I have decided to have a go at owning a motorhome (class A). Saturday we hope to go look at several different models in our area, and all have either a GM 454 or Ford 460. These models range from '85 - '97. Yeah, they are on the older side but we only have so much budgeted for this.
The 454 is a very ubiquitous engine, and it would be my preference. My question here is if it's a mistake to get an 460 of this age due to it having less parts availability. Is one engine commonly seen as more reliable than the other? Can you still find OEM parts for the Ford? I am mechanically inclined and would likely be doing the vast majority of the work on any camper myself.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
02-06-2020, 11:01 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,019
|
Would you be interested in buying a normal daily vehicle in the model year range of ‘85-‘97?
Good luck.....I sincerely hope you are mechanically inclined.
Too vintage for my blood.
__________________
kenandterry
2018 Sunseeker 2430S-CD carried by a 2017 Ford E450
Bye 2010 Georgetown 330TS after 10 terrific years, as we downsize for the next phase.
|
|
|
02-06-2020, 11:12 AM
|
#3
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenandterry
Would you be interested in buying a normal daily vehicle in the model year range of ‘85-‘97?
Good luck.....I sincerely hope you are mechanically inclined.
Too vintage for my blood.
|
You know, I actually would! Driving a big block to work every day would be a blast!
Like I said we are just trying to get a feel for the life. We don't have plans to take it more than a few hundred miles and if we do, we will certainly look for something a little newer.
|
|
|
02-06-2020, 11:22 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Loma Rica Calif
Posts: 63
|
Find an unit with a floorplan that suits you let that decide what motor. I am gm guy but couldn't find a floorplan she(we) liked with gm power, so ford it is. Very happy with our 2010 Winnebago Sightseer.
__________________
Randy, Robbie from Loma Rica Calif.
2010 Winnebago Sightseer 35j
2006 Jeep Wrangler X toad
|
|
|
02-06-2020, 11:48 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 5,819
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuppster
The 454 is a very ubiquitous engine, and it would be my preference. My question here is if it's a mistake to get an 460 of this age due to it having less parts availability. Is one engine commonly seen as more reliable than the other? Can you still find OEM parts for the Ford? I am mechanically inclined and would likely be doing the vast majority of the work on any camper myself.
|
I have a 1982 Ford with 460. Getting engine parts is not an issue. There are plenty of engine parts available aftermarket.
The hardest part, I think, will be getting parts for the interior stuff.
Fortunately the technology back then is not as complicated as the new stuff so if you're good with your hands and working with tools, you should be able to rebuild or replace any of the mechanical systems.
Getting any interior trim or finish pieces will be the hard thing.
|
|
|
02-06-2020, 11:54 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Fleetwood Owners Club Freightliner Owners Club
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lost
Posts: 570
|
No problem getting OEM or aftermarket parts for an F53 with the 460. A bigger concern is the warping exhaust manifolds. I swapped mine out for a complete Banks system. The Banks made a noticeable performance difference on my 34’ Bounder.
__________________
2007 Fleetwood Expedition 38L
Nowhere special to go...... and all day to get there!
|
|
|
02-06-2020, 12:00 PM
|
#7
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 95f5334j
No problem getting OEM or aftermarket parts for an F53 with the 460. A bigger concern is the warping exhaust manifolds. I swapped mine out for a complete Banks system. The Banks made a noticeable performance difference on my 34’ Bounder.
|
Do the manifolds on the Chevy's warp too? We drove a 454 last week and the headers leaked real bad. For that reason and several others we walked away from that RV.
|
|
|
02-06-2020, 12:01 PM
|
#8
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CountryB
I have a 1982 Ford with 460. Getting engine parts is not an issue. There are plenty of engine parts available aftermarket.
The hardest part, I think, will be getting parts for the interior stuff.
Fortunately the technology back then is not as complicated as the new stuff so if you're good with your hands and working with tools, you should be able to rebuild or replace any of the mechanical systems.
Getting any interior trim or finish pieces will be the hard thing.
|
I would love to hear a little more about your camper. How many miles? Are you comfortable taking it on trips? How long have you owned it?
|
|
|
02-06-2020, 12:34 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Muskoka Ontario Canada
Posts: 3,142
|
For a few extra dollars, you can get into the v 10 ford, which started around the mid to late 90s. That motor is bullet proof. Worth the extra if you asked me.
__________________
2000 coachmen santara 370 5.9 cummins isb
|
|
|
02-06-2020, 12:41 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 3,542
|
At that edge the exact engine in it is secondary. First find floorplan(s) you like and buy that. Of course you want to be as comfortable as possible that the engine and drive train are sound. But brand doesn't really make or break 'is sound' as far as I'm concerned.
We started with an '96 with a 454, it was a great old coach. Drove it for two years and it never gave us any problem. After that we knew what changes we wanted and the things that we didn't know about when shopping the first time, so we went shopping for something newer that we plan to keep a good long time.
__________________
2013 Winnebago Sightseer 36V
|
|
|
02-06-2020, 01:45 PM
|
#11
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by winniman
For a few extra dollars, you can get into the v 10 ford, which started around the mid to late 90s. That motor is bullet proof. Worth the extra if you asked me.
|
That would be nice, but the only V10 in our area is twice the price of all the others
|
|
|
02-06-2020, 04:03 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,969
|
I shopped for quite bit for my "bargain". I was after a handyman special type. I ended up with '93 F53 with the 460. I was open to either a Ford or GM but I noted that Fords got overdrive transmissions a bit earlier and more commonly than the GM's I was looking at.
The 460 Fords are essentially Ford F550 trucks in the driveline and they share some other parts like brakes too. Think flatbed farm trucks and tow trucks. If your local parts store doesn't have normal service engine parts for one, they nee dto just shut down. Many parts stores also list the F53 chassis too, so no need to guess at which F550 parts fit.
Not having bought one, I'm less familiar with the GM chassis. I do know that they are "P" chassi based. Meaning bread trucks, delivery vans and such. Meaning that the parts also have parts for them. Because parts places carry stuff for work trucks.
Early Fords had C6 transmissions early GM's had Turbo 400's or some variation. Both very respected for their durability but both three speeds. Some people say they don't care as when traveling their coaches hardly stay in overdrive unless they are going downhill. There's a grain of truth in that but I'm an overdrive junkie, I have to have it.
The Ford's got E4OD's. later slightly upgraded and called 4R100's. The early ones had some teething problems but if the coach has more than 30K miles on it those should have been found and dealt with years and years ago. Pretty tough transmissions. Also huge for a passenger/truck transmission.
A 4L80E is the GM equivalent. A little prone to problems with reverse that you can check for. (It either backs up nice and firmly or it doesn't). Every bit as durable as the Fords but in a more compact package.
The rest others here have more experience with. I never even heard of Newmar when I found mine. Reading a LOT in the Newmar forum right here figured largely in me deciding to take a chance on it. There are complaints and problems with everything and that's what most posts are about. But it kind of came through that people seemed to really like their various Newmar products. Now I do too.
|
|
|
02-07-2020, 02:50 AM
|
#13
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GypsyR
I shopped for quite bit for my "bargain". I was after a handyman special type. I ended up with '93 F53 with the 460. I was open to either a Ford or GM but I noted that Fords got overdrive transmissions a bit earlier and more commonly than the GM's I was looking at.
The 460 Fords are essentially Ford F550 trucks in the driveline and they share some other parts like brakes too. Think flatbed farm trucks and tow trucks. If your local parts store doesn't have normal service engine parts for one, they nee dto just shut down. Many parts stores also list the F53 chassis too, so no need to guess at which F550 parts fit.
Not having bought one, I'm less familiar with the GM chassis. I do know that they are "P" chassi based. Meaning bread trucks, delivery vans and such. Meaning that the parts also have parts for them. Because parts places carry stuff for work trucks.
Early Fords had C6 transmissions early GM's had Turbo 400's or some variation. Both very respected for their durability but both three speeds. Some people say they don't care as when traveling their coaches hardly stay in overdrive unless they are going downhill. There's a grain of truth in that but I'm an overdrive junkie, I have to have it.
The Ford's got E4OD's. later slightly upgraded and called 4R100's. The early ones had some teething problems but if the coach has more than 30K miles on it those should have been found and dealt with years and years ago. Pretty tough transmissions. Also huge for a passenger/truck transmission.
A 4L80E is the GM equivalent. A little prone to problems with reverse that you can check for. (It either backs up nice and firmly or it doesn't). Every bit as durable as the Fords but in a more compact package.
The rest others here have more experience with. I never even heard of Newmar when I found mine. Reading a LOT in the Newmar forum right here figured largely in me deciding to take a chance on it. There are complaints and problems with everything and that's what most posts are about. But it kind of came through that people seemed to really like their various Newmar products. Now I do too.
|
Thank you for your insight, that's helpful!
|
|
|
02-07-2020, 08:13 AM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,797
|
I think you are being smart. There's nothing wrong with an older motorhome and it will be within your budget. Assuming you do your homework and get a sound one, you will be able to address any items needing attention - with the proviso that you are not a "Checkbook mechanic".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuppster
...Like I said we are just trying to get a feel for the life. We don't have plans to take it more than a few hundred miles and if we do, we will certainly look for something a little newer.
|
__________________
George Schweikle Lexington, KY
2005 Safari (Monaco)Trek 28RB2, Workhorse W20, 8.1, Allison 1000 5 spd, UltraPower engine & tranny, Track bars & sway bars, KONI FSD, FMCA 190830, Safari Int'l. chapter. 1999 Safari Trek 2830, 1995 Safari Trek 2430, 1983 Winnebago Chieftain, 1976 Midas Mini
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|