|
|
09-24-2020, 10:32 AM
|
#15
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 4
|
Thank you all for your great, valuable feedback.
Considering quality I've now moved onto to a more specific size, layout and subsequently drivability.
At this point I think I am down to:
Bay Star Sport 2815
Winnebago Intent 28Y
Winnebago Navion 24D
Clearly the Class A's offer a lot more space and capacity (tanks, propane etc.). The Intent appears to be better outfitted with systems, the BSS gets the nod for overall quality and the Navion gets the nod for technology and drivability.
I will be putting together a detailed comparison spreadsheet with all the things that are important to us.
I wish the Navion came on the Transit chassis; probably a $20K savings.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
09-24-2020, 12:23 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: OKC
Posts: 567
|
I looked through websites for the small class A's before I bought my C. One of the things that really turned me off about them is the wheelbase ratio. If memory serves, the only small A that has a high wheelbase ratio is the Axis line. That Newmar looks really nice, but it has a .53 wheelbase ratio. I don't know why they're always so low on units that are small enough that the steer axle won't be overloaded, but they always tend to be. For the Class C, I gave up living space to have better capability--a higher-capacity hitch, and a longer wheelbase. For instance, my unit has a wheelbase 2" shorter than the Newmar here, for an overall length 2' 7" shorter. That's a lot shorter rear overhang.
Anyway, I'm sure that's not the best way to pick a coach, but it's something to be aware of.
Edit--and holding tank size. I gave up a lot of that, and I'm very jealous of the large tankage on some class A's.
__________________
2011 Jayco Embark Super C
Cummins 8.3 350
|
|
|
09-24-2020, 04:01 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 8,945
|
Out of the list I would pick the same 3 as everyone else, Winnebago, Tiffin and Newmar in no particular order, though if I were being honest, I would pick my 2002 Safari Trek over all of them. If I just had to spend more money then it would be a 2006-2007 Safari Trek (the last year they were built).
We have traveled to a 4 or 5 national parks in our coach since buying it in 2016, and find it to be just about as large as I would want and still fit in a large percentage of National Park campgrounds. It is also small enough to travel without a TOAD, though there are limitations on parking and where we go, which we make up for by occasionally renting a car, public transit or using Uber, or our ebike.
Attached is a photo of our coach backed into the parking lot at the Blue Bell Ice Cream factory visitor center in Texas last year.
__________________
2002 Safari Trek 2830 on P32 Chassis with 8.1L w/ 400 watts solar 420Ah LiFePo4
2017 Jeep Cherokee Overland & 2007 Toyota Yaris TOADs with Even Brake,
Demco Commander tow bar and Blue Ox / Roadmaster base plates
|
|
|
09-24-2020, 06:47 PM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7,494
|
Even though I own a Winnebago I can tell you the Baystar is far nicer than the intent.
__________________
2008 Phoenix Cruiser 3100
2012 Jeep Wrangler Sahara JKU.
|
|
|
09-26-2020, 07:01 AM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,698
|
Aalmost every one of your listed choices is the entry level model in the respective lineups. I suggest going up to at least the midrange models and then start looking at what you require in terms of layout and features. Test drive the models you are interested in. Then make your decision based on which you like and not on what others tell you to like.
__________________
TeamFoxy ~ Traveling North America
2016 Newmar Canyon Star 3710
2017 Chevy Equinox in tow.
|
|
|
09-26-2020, 09:10 AM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 8,945
|
Teamfoxy, name one currently manufactured coach under 30ft that is not considered "entry level"? Part of the problem with the RV industry is the attitude bigger is always better, the most luxurious models are all the biggest today.
__________________
2002 Safari Trek 2830 on P32 Chassis with 8.1L w/ 400 watts solar 420Ah LiFePo4
2017 Jeep Cherokee Overland & 2007 Toyota Yaris TOADs with Even Brake,
Demco Commander tow bar and Blue Ox / Roadmaster base plates
|
|
|
09-27-2020, 07:16 AM
|
#21
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac-1
Teamfoxy, name one currently manufactured coach under 30ft that is not considered "entry level"? Part of the problem with the RV industry is the attitude bigger is always better, the most luxurious models are all the biggest today.
|
I suppose that entry level is somewhat subjective, but for example, Coachmen makes the Mirada, which is a step up from the Pusuit and has several models under 35 ft. They used to make the 29 QB, which was a no slide coach at 30 feet. Other brands also have models just over 30 ft. The OP mentioned the Baystar, which has its shortest at 31 feet, and while entry level to Newmar, is not even in the same league with the Intent, Axis, or other models mentioned.
__________________
TeamFoxy ~ Traveling North America
2016 Newmar Canyon Star 3710
2017 Chevy Equinox in tow.
|
|
|
09-28-2020, 01:53 PM
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,385
|
They hold those b+ vans very dear.
A third ace or the little newmar will get you a lot more motorhome for the dollar.
Hell, for not much more than the van, you can get a baby tiffin diesel pusher!
|
|
|
09-28-2020, 02:06 PM
|
#23
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 656
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneknight
They hold those b+ vans very dear.
A third ace or the little newmar will get you a lot more motorhome for the dollar.
Hell, for not much more than the van, you can get a baby tiffin diesel pusher!
|
Well said !
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|