Quote:
Originally Posted by Crasher
I've stated it before, but it bears repeating. All of us had to study the traffic laws, pass a written test and demonstrate to a driving inspector our ability to drive a car safely before getting a driver's license. Then some of us who wanted to operate a commercial vehicle had to do more studying, take another test and demonstrate not only our ability to operate that vehicle, but also how to inspect the brakes and keep the unit safe. If you want a motorcycle endorsement, it's another written and driving test. Why is it that all you have to do to legally drive a motorhome weighing over ten times more than your car in many states is write a check and sign your name?? Why aren't MH owners required to prove they have the ability to operate it safely and the knowledge of how to maintain and keep it operationally safe??
|
I look no further than the states that have implemented an RV drivers license as an example of why and how this should not be done. It seems many / most of them have simply taken the existing CDL testing requirements and removed a few particularly non-relevant bits, leaving many other non-relevant bits in.
Your typical motorhome operator does not need to know formulas for size and type of fire extinguisher to carry, or show the ability to back down a long,alley to a loading dock, or correct distance spacing for orange cones, or most of the load balancing, tie down stuff, for that matter how many motorhome operators need to know when to replace tires based on wear, ...
This leaves exactly what that should be on a written motorhome operators test? Check your mirrors, and get off the road if conditions are bad? I am not against training, I just don't see what good formal state licensing does.