|
|
02-26-2015, 06:47 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
|
Who has the most hp.. And torque
Who has the most power... I've been checking and it seems that those that have big power, have big weight to go with it...
sooo.. who has the best pound per pound power..
we have 300 hp--660 torque..
my coach loaded..22,600... that's wet with all our gear
soooo..
22600 lbs divide by 660 tq =34.24 lbs per 1 ft lb torque
22600 llbs divide by 300 hp =75.33 lbs per 1 hp
seems to be one of the top ones out there because of the low weight it pulls
now lets go to GCVW... 30,000
30,000 lbs divide by 660 tq =45.45 lbs per 1 ft lb torque
30,000 lbs divide by 300 hp=100 lbs per 1 hp
lets see whats out there...
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
02-26-2015, 07:31 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 137
|
My Detroit 14 ltr with a programmer installed is rated at 585 HP and +- 2000 ft lbs of torque. At 51k lbs fully loaded here my specs...
87 HP per Lb
25 lbs of torque per Lb
Passes everything on the road but a truckstop!
__________________
2006 Monaco Executive
Detroit 60-14 liter
Sisterdale, Texas
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 07:53 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Altoona, Iowa
Posts: 1,668
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LVRVLUVR
Who has the most power... I've been checking and it seems that those that have big power, have big weight to go with it...
sooo.. who has the best pound per pound power..
we have 300 hp--660 torque..
my coach loaded..22,600... that's wet with all our gear
soooo..
22600 lbs divide by 660 tq =34.24 lbs per 1 ft lb torque
22600 llbs divide by 300 hp =75.33 lbs per 1 hp
seems to be one of the top ones out there because of the low weight it pulls
now lets go to GCVW... 30,000
30,000 lbs divide by 660 tq =45.45 lbs per 1 ft lb torque
30,000 lbs divide by 300 hp=100 lbs per 1 hp
lets see whats out there...
|
Just for comparison, on my F-53 22K chassis:
19,160 lbs loaded/457 ft-lbs=41.9 lb/ft-lb torque
19,160 lbs loaded/362 hp = 52.9 lb/hp
22,960 lbs combined/457 ft-lbs=50.2 lb/ft-lb torque
22,960 lbs combined/362 hp = 63.4 lbs/hp
However, you are running your torque and horsepower through 6 gears whereas mine is 5 gears and we both have different rear end ratios and tire diameters. The two engines also have differing hp-torque curves. So my above numbers do not really have any meaning when trying to compare them to yours.
__________________
2010 Itasca Sunova 33C, (lots of upgrades and modifications)
2011 Honda CRV, 2004 Rubicon (many modifications)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 07:54 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: San antonio, TX
Posts: 624
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockcrawler
My Detroit 14 ltr with a programmer installed is rated at 585 HP and +- 2000 ft lbs of torque. At 51k lbs fully loaded here my specs...
87 HP per Lb
25 lbs of torque per Lb
Passes everything on the road but a truckstop!
|
I'm guessing your coach weighs in the neighborhood of 45,000 pounds, so at 87 HP per pound, that would give you about 8,000,000 HP total. I don't think anyone on this site even comes close to beating you!
__________________
USAF Retired
2000 Prevost Marathon H3-45
Towing 2019 RAM 1500
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 08:02 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Altoona, Iowa
Posts: 1,668
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peralko
I'm guessing your coach weighs in the neighborhood of 45,000 pounds, so at 87 HP per pound, that would give you about 8,000,000 HP total. I don't think anyone on this site even comes close to beating you!
|
chuckle..I wondered at that also,then I figured it out, he really meant:
87 lbs/hp
25 lbs/ft-lb of torque
__________________
2010 Itasca Sunova 33C, (lots of upgrades and modifications)
2011 Honda CRV, 2004 Rubicon (many modifications)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 08:04 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
|
no wonder I though the little winnabago was a rocket.... it was
in stock form... @14,5000 lbs..
39 per hp
31 per ft lbs torque
with banks...
35 per hp
27 per ft lb torque
it would out run diesel pushers so bad they couldn't catch me with a CB
just hav'n fun ... don't nobody get their under roos in a wad...
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 08:10 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,816
|
450 hp 1250 ft lbs running down the road at 44,000 lbs.
97.77 lbs per HP
35.2 lbs per ft lbs
Edit: found my gross
GCWR is 57,000 lbs
126.66 lbs per hp
45.6 lbs per ft lbs
__________________
2011 MVP Tahoe 230 QB on Ford E350 Chassis
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 08:22 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDR John
450 hp 1250 ft lbs running down the road at 44,000 lbs.
97.77 lbs per HP
35.2 lbs per ft lbs
|
so we need to put your motor in my coach
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 08:32 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,816
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LVRVLUVR
so we need to put your motor in my coach
|
We might have to regear the axle with 2.55s so the front wheels stay down.
__________________
2011 MVP Tahoe 230 QB on Ford E350 Chassis
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 08:38 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 137
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aauummm
chuckle..I wondered at that also,then I figured it out, he really meant:
87 lbs/hp
25 lbs/ft-lb of torque
|
I know what I mean...I just cant talk it or type it
__________________
2006 Monaco Executive
Detroit 60-14 liter
Sisterdale, Texas
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 08:49 AM
|
#11
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 14
|
'95 Holiday Rambler Navigator with optional M-11. 33,200 GVWR. 400hp / 1600 lb/ft torque. 83 lbs / hp; 20.75 lbs / lb/ft of torque.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 09:16 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Full Timing
Posts: 751
|
400 HP, 1200 lbs/ft torque. 29,980 fully loaded.
75 lb/HP
25 lb/lb-ft
__________________
Mike
2003 Alpine Coach 40MDTS - 400HP Cummins ISL
Can Am Spyder Roadster
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 09:38 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCal Kevin
'95 Holiday Rambler Navigator with optional M-11. 33,200 GVWR. 400hp / 1600 lb/ft torque. 83 lbs / hp; 20.75 lbs / lb/ft of torque.
|
do tell whats the m-11
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 09:38 AM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Fleetwood Owners Club Spartan Chassis
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 303
|
Interesting topic. Mine is a teenie weenie ISBXT 350/750 in a 2010 Discovery which works out to:
GVWR 32000 91.42 lb/hp 42.67 lb/ft-lb
GVCWR 42000 120 lb/hp 56 lb/ft-lb
Never couldn't make it to the top of a mountain, but maybe I wouldn't be in first place
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|