As far as ventilators go, I'll bet that very few iRV2 members remember the polio epidemic from the 1950s... If you want to see the inventivness that was around then then google the "Emergency Wooden Ventilator" article in the January 1952 Popular Mechanics magazine (the magazine is on the web). Back then the common term for ventilator was "iron lung". The "wooden lung" even made it to the web in this free ebook...
www.spearfishlaketales.com/40fk/fk.htm ...one of about 60 fictional ebooks that Wes Boyd wrote before he passed away.
But back to Covid...
Please click and read...
https: // www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/03/how-will-coronavirus-end/608719/
and...
https: // www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/america-learn-new-york/608875/
Both are well researched and worth reading. I found them courtesy of an
acquaintance... who also said:
> Covid19 cases have increased exponentially since March 2nd, with a
> doubling time of about 2.6 days. The effects of recent spread reduction
> measures ("social distancing") may not be apparent for a week, maybe
> two, given the approximately 5 to 10 day incubation period.
He also said:
> The text below is from the Los Angeles Times newspaper seven days ago: (the
> last paragraph is the zinger - all reported numbers will be inaccurate!
> The first paragraph is also important. And the attached image file (the graph)
> is telling... and note that the vertical of the graph is not linear but exponential...
>> Los Angeles County health officials advised doctors to give up on testing patients in the
>> hope of containing the coronavirus outbreak, instructing them to test patients only if a
>> positive result could change how they would be treated.
>>
>> The guidance, sent by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health to doctors on
>> Thursday, was prompted by a crush of patients and shortage of tests, and could make it
>> difficult to ever know precisely how many people in L.A. County contracted the virus.
>
>> The department “is shifting from a strategy of case containment to slowing disease
>> transmission and averting excess morbidity and mortality,” according to the letter.
>> Doctors should test symptomatic patients only when “a diagnostic result will change
>> clinical management or inform public health response.”
>
>> The guidance sets in writing what has been a reality all along. The shortage of tests
>> nationwide has meant that many patients suspected of having COVID-19 have not
>> had the diagnosis confirmed by a laboratory.
>>
>> In addition to the lack of tests, public health agencies across the country lack
>> the staff to trace the source of new cases, drastically reducing the chances of isolating
>> people who have been exposed and thereby containing the outbreak.
>
>> For years, state and local health officials have been warning that steep cuts to federal
>> grants meant to boost preparedness for a pandemic would mean there wouldn’t be enough
>> equipment and staff on hand to respond in the crucial, early stage. Those fears have come
>> to fruition now, officials said.
>
>> A front-line healthcare provider who was not authorized to speak to the media and requested
>> anonymity said county doctors are interpreting Thursday’s letter and other advice coming
>> from senior L.A. County public health officials to mean they should only test patients
>> who are going to be hospitalized or have something unique about the way they contracted
>> the virus.
>>
>> They are not planning to test patients who have the symptoms but are otherwise healthy
>> enough to be sent home to self-quarantine — meaning they may never show up in official
>> tallies of people who tested positive.
Comment: You can't develop proper response methods unless you know the size of the problem.