Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky_Boss
|
Global warming pusher article.
[QUOTE=Sky_Boss;2493084]
California drought: Past dry periods have lasted more than 200 years, scientists say
/QUOTE]
Unless they are looking at tree rings from giant sequoias they don't have tree rings to prove 1000 year history. So I would want to ask them what trees. We all get lied to a lot so I verify everything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky_Boss
I'm just answering your questions not trying to get into any debate about global warming or such. Regardless of causality, there really isn't and debate that a draught is and has been in place and that it is a repetitive cycle that we could be in the beginning of.
|
Me either. Certainly not with you or here. Please don't take any of this as hostile toward you. Not meant to be. I take issue with any government official, news outlet or organization throwing out arbitrary numbers just to move people in the direction they want. That claim (and I'm not blaming you here) didn't pass the smell test.
If you look at the claims in those stories they are using predictive computer models to project weather decades out. So if the National Weather Service and every meteorologist in the country can't accurately predict the weather one week from now, how can they predict 50 years out? They can't. Those computer models are nothing but a program, created by people who get grants and make their living by predicting doom and gloom. Some of these same peeps said an ice age was coming back in the 70's.
California' water problems are mostly self inflicted. As I said they are draining stockpiles for minnows. They have overbuilt a desert that does not have the local water to support it. They have done very little to improve the supply of water for decades. The Aquaduct being the last major thing. Freebees buy votes, water desalination plants don't. California is, has always been and always will be a desert. Plan accordingly.
I stand by my other comment, more on point with your OP, there will be an increase cost/penalty at CG's because it will be a luxury item. Camping is not considered necessary (although I disagree with that) and as such they will not avoid tax burden there in the interest of commerce/economy.
You are correct, no matter the cause Cali is in trouble and since a great deal of the nations food comes from there it will impact us all. But if they don't put the adults in charge there I see little hope of what can be done being done to correct it. The adults are not in charge there.