Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > TRAVEL TRAILER, 5th WHEEL & TRUCK CAMPER FORUMS > 5th Wheel Discussion
Click Here to Login
Register FilesVendors Registry Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 08-17-2017, 12:23 PM   #85
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Spicewood, Tx
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastEagle View Post
The reason for not authorizing replacement tires from other designs is all about vehicle certification. Because the vehicle manufacturer has used a particular tire size and design and said it's appropriate on the certification label is seen as binding by tire manufacturers. They cannot control the actions of all retailers handling their products but they, themselves, will not recommend replacing a Original Equipment ST tire with anything but another tire deemed appropriate for trailer service. That includes LT tires designed for “Regional Service Trailer” (RST).

Here is a lesser known tire manufacturers wording about industry standards for replacement tires.

Cooper Tire & Rubber Company - Tire Selection



Look at it objectively. Once an owner strays from following the vehicle manufacturers recommendations for tire replacement, who is going to take the fall for unforeseen failures because of the fitment?
The Cooper info never uses the word 'required' but uses the word 'recommended'. In addition, there is a section titled 'Tire mixing' and again 'recommends' against using different sizes, load ranges and type of construction. But they do not say there is a requirement that mixing cannot be done. The implication is that they understand that there is no requirement to use a specific tire, all they can do is recommend that owners follow the tire sticker.

As for as straying from the 'manufacturers recommendation', there is little benefit in using an ST tire from the majority of tire manufacturers, the owner or his insurance company will end up taking the 'fall'.
__________________
Larry Day, Texas Baptist Men volunteer
'13 Silverado LT 3500HD D/A CCSB 2wd, custom RKI bed
'19 Starcraft Telluride 292RLS
dayle1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-17-2017, 06:01 PM   #86
Senior Member
 
FastEagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by dayle1 View Post
The Cooper info never uses the word 'required' but uses the word 'recommended'. In addition, there is a section titled 'Tire mixing' and again 'recommends' against using different sizes, load ranges and type of construction. But they do not say there is a requirement that mixing cannot be done. The implication is that they understand that there is no requirement to use a specific tire, all they can do is recommend that owners follow the tire sticker.

As for as straying from the 'manufacturers recommendation', there is little benefit in using an ST tire from the majority of tire manufacturers, the owner or his insurance company will end up taking the 'fall'.
Maxxis Said; "Always choose the original size or the size recommended by your manufacturer when replacing your tires. Replacing tires of different speed ratings, sizes or construction could lead to improper tire performance, tire failure and accident, causing possible serious injury or death."

Maxxis Automotive Tires Important Safety Information | Maxxis Tires USA
FastEagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 06:20 PM   #87
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,807
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastEagle View Post
You support an owners decision to make a radical design change not supported by tire industry standards?
Owners have been doing that on their cars almost as long as cars have existed.
aether_one is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 07:55 PM   #88
Senior Member
 
FastEagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by tfryman View Post
Owners have been doing that on their cars almost as long as cars have existed.
The person that was quoted to is a tire engineer. He often does seminars at various venues.
FastEagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2017, 07:47 AM   #89
Senior Member
 
monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,500
I would have gone with LT's,,, but they are Very rare now days in a 15" size.(as far as E rating anyway) So I replaced the D rated china bombs for E rated Maxxis . So far I am Very Happy with them ! (and response from Maxxis to my questions) I still have the email stating that "ST" tires rated to 65 mph is a Government issued thing... Maxxis rates their tires (mine) to 99mph.. That being said,,, again the ST rating is 65 mph per big brother... Will you see me pulling my 5vr at 90+mph ??? HECK NO !!!! Unless the world is collapsing then all bets are off... I just wanted a tire to safely run 68-70 mph because we are usually time limited on vacations,,, on long mile interstate runs... My truck/trailer combo feels very comphy to me,,, and for what its worth,,,,, I pull doubles 100K miles a year...
Monkey
__________________
Monkey, pilot of a Great Dane hauler,
2015 Silverado 2500 Duramax/Alison 4x4 CrewCab 2016 Cougar 28SGS
1ST CAV
monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2017, 08:08 AM   #90
Senior Member
 
Tireman9's Avatar
Commercial Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 2,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkey View Post
I would have gone with LT's,,, but they are Very rare now days in a 15" size.(as far as E rating anyway) So I replaced the D rated china bombs for E rated Maxxis . So far I am Very Happy with them ! (and response from Maxxis to my questions) I still have the email stating that "ST" tires rated to 65 mph is a Government issued thing... Maxxis rates their tires (mine) to 99mph.. That being said,,, again the ST rating is 65 mph per big brother... Will you see me pulling my 5vr at 90+mph ??? HECK NO !!!! Unless the world is collapsing then all bets are off... I just wanted a tire to safely run 68-70 mph because we are usually time limited on vacations,,, on long mile interstate runs... My truck/trailer combo feels very comphy to me,,, and for what its worth,,,,, I pull doubles 100K miles a year...
Monkey
Sorry it's not "Big Brother" that says 65 mph for ST tires. It is fundamental tire engineering. The reason ST type tires are rated for higher load capacity than an identical size & inflation LT tire is because the load formula used to generate the Load & Inflation table numbers is based on a design limit of 65 mph.

The recent change to applying "Speed Symbol" to ST tires was done for political not engineering reasons. Some imported tires were being "dumped" into the US market (artificially lower pricing). Import duties (taxes) were being applied to some tires but exceptions were made and IMO some folks involved with importing low cost ST tires managed to "sell" the idea that tires with speed ratings should be exempt from the import tax.
Then marketing types decided that offer a higher speed symbol might increase sales by implying the higher speed rating tires were somehow better than a tire with a lower speed rating.

If you want to believe there was some magic tire construction features that were applied almost overnight to ST tires to give them 20% greater load capacity than a comparable LT tire have you asked yourself why the same magic tire engineering hasn't been applied to P type and LT type tires to give then an extra 10 to 20% load capacity?
__________________
Retired Design & Quality Tire Eng. 40+ years experience. Recognized in the industry and in court as an expert in failed tire inspection as I have performed thousands of failed tire "autopsies".
Tireman9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
tires



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Front headlights changed to BMW E39 series headlights Rippenrick Alpine Coach Owner's Forum 13 09-20-2013 11:07 PM
Series/Parallel or Parallel/Series rpasetto Monaco Owner's Forum 45 09-28-2011 12:52 AM
Series/Series Parallel CARVAL Motorsports MH-General Discussions & Problems 7 01-28-2009 12:02 PM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.