|
|
04-12-2017, 02:59 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 859
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnTrek
I'd agree the CAT scale is your cheapest friend to avoid headaches.
Probably none of us DRW LWB drivers are wild about daily driving bobtail, with those long wide hips. But, are we going to tow heavy or pick up burgers more? Much depends on your priorities. If you're towing a few hundred miles a yr. like some weekend warriors or tow 10K mi. a year. Everything about RV'ing is a compromise.
OP sounds like they should be in the "ball park" with SRW PU. Although trailer 4800# CCC rating sounds a little high to me?
Be well.
|
I'm the OP and ugh... I may have to go dually or change to another fiver. Did I say ugh?... I'm planning to full-time, not go on pizza runs... well there will be some pizza runs but it wouldn't be easy in a dually.
The CCC of the Arctic Fox 29-5t is listed as "Net Carrying Capacity: 4824". Specs here: Northwood | Arctic Fox 29-5T
The 1 ton SRW trucks seem to have a 4,000# payload. 1,000# of that will go to driver, passenger, hitch, bed liner, fuel, groceries... That leaves 3,000#. Were I to max out the 29-5t's weight at 15,700, call it 16,000, and if 25% of that found its way to the hitch that would be 4,000# kingpin weight, or 1,000# more than I'd have with a 1-ton SRW. Ugh...
The gross dry weight of the 29-5t is 10876. Assuming 25% of the loaded RV will find its way to the kingpin I could only load that rig to 12,000#. That's only 1124# of stuff I could put in the RV... not nearly enough. This is why it has become so important to find out how much of the cargo weight stored in the basement and forward compartment will be transferred to the kingpin.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
04-12-2017, 03:01 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oroville, CA
Posts: 3,133
|
Its a leverage calculation, like speedracer says. Not a structural engineer, so I can't give you the equation, but Google it and see what you find.
__________________
Bill, Kathi and Zorro; '05 Beaver Patriot Thunder
2012 Sunnybrook Harmony 21FBS (SQEZINN)
2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 03:03 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oroville, CA
Posts: 3,133
|
__________________
Bill, Kathi and Zorro; '05 Beaver Patriot Thunder
2012 Sunnybrook Harmony 21FBS (SQEZINN)
2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 03:20 PM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 284
|
Arctic fox (well northwoods manufacturing)has an owners forum. You might try going there and see if someone has done the scale thing with there 29.5 and give you real world weights. You might try calling the factory as well not a salesman at the rv lot, though they may not have any better knowledge.
Home - Northwood RV Owners Association Forum
__________________
2016 Jayco Eagle 27.5 RLTS
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 04:28 PM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Palm Coast Florida
Posts: 12,995
|
I read thru the post...at 1st I thought a SRW F350 would be enough truck...but holy cow, I did not know that the AF was built that well. That must be a very well built rig.
So now I can see your issue. The SRW truck might not be enough...ugh.
Do the other manufacturers build a SRW truck that will work? Does Ram or Chevy build a truck with more carrying capacity than Ford? It has been a while since I looked at trucks.
Now - with a dually you will learn to like it. They are not that bad...yes, they are not a car or SUV but I like driving mine. Beside parking away from the store and walking is good for you.
Good luck
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 05:17 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,465
|
So here are the numbers for the Arctic Fox 29-5T.
Specifications:
Dry Axle Weight (approx. Lbs.): 8,853
Dry Hitch Weight (approx. Lbs.): 2,023
Net Carrying Capacity: 4,824
Gross Dry Weight – Lbs.: 10,876
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVWR) – Lbs.: 15,700
Exterior Length (approx. w / hitch): 33’11”
I would say as long as you didn't put a ton of stuff in this 34' 5er you really should be OK with a 4,000# payload, no need for washer/dryer correct?
I would say that less than 50% of stuff added to the basement goes on the pin, the basement looks to be closer to the axles than the pin. That and the tandem axles don't act like a true fulcrum.
__________________
Russ & Paula, Portland, OR. The Beagle Belle.
2016 Ram Laramie 3500 DRW Aisin 4X4 14,000# GVWR.
2005 Keystone Copper Canyon 293FWSLS Rear Kitchen 12,360 GVWR
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 05:27 PM
|
#21
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,465
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdracr39
Someone posted a formula for that in the past I'll look around for it.
It was something to the effect of this :
If the distance was 20 feet from the center of the axles to the pin and you added 200 lbs at 10 feet behind the pin it would add 100 pounds to the axles and 100 pounds to the pin. It is relative so if the weight were 5 feet from the pin it would add 150 pounds to the pin and 50 to the axles.
|
Doesn't quite work that way in the real world. While the pin is a true fulcrum, the Tandem axles are not, in the case of weight loaded half way between the axles and pin only about 40% or less will go to the pin.
__________________
Russ & Paula, Portland, OR. The Beagle Belle.
2016 Ram Laramie 3500 DRW Aisin 4X4 14,000# GVWR.
2005 Keystone Copper Canyon 293FWSLS Rear Kitchen 12,360 GVWR
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 06:22 PM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 859
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cruzbill
|
Thanks for that. It may prove useful at some point for making approximations if nothing else.
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 06:36 PM
|
#23
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 859
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhagfo
So here are the numbers for the Arctic Fox 29-5T.
Specifications:
Dry Axle Weight (approx. Lbs.): 8,853
Dry Hitch Weight (approx. Lbs.): 2,023
Net Carrying Capacity: 4,824
Gross Dry Weight – Lbs.: 10,876
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVWR) – Lbs.: 15,700
Exterior Length (approx. w / hitch): 33’11”
I would say as long as you didn't put a ton of stuff in this 34' 5er you really should be OK with a 4,000# payload, no need for washer/dryer correct?
I would say that less than 50% of stuff added to the basement goes on the pin, the basement looks to be closer to the axles than the pin. That and the tandem axles don't act like a true fulcrum.
|
Yes, I have all those numbers for the 29-5t. If I added a "ton of stuff" as you wrote I'd be OK, but the fact is I need to add more than a ton of stuff. Water alone would be over 550# if I had to travel any distance with a full tank.
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 06:39 PM
|
#24
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 859
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuffr2
I read thru the post...at 1st I thought a SRW F350 would be enough truck...but holy cow, I did not know that the AF was built that well. That must be a very well built rig.
So now I can see your issue. The SRW truck might not be enough...ugh.
Do the other manufacturers build a SRW truck that will work? Does Ram or Chevy build a truck with more carrying capacity than Ford? It has been a while since I looked at trucks.
Now - with a dually you will learn to like it. They are not that bad...yes, they are not a car or SUV but I like driving mine. Beside parking away from the store and walking is good for you.
Good luck
|
Yes, the Arctic Fox is heavy. That's a sign they use heavy materials but not an indication that they are well assembled!
The Chevy and Ford have payloads that are very close.
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 06:40 PM
|
#25
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 287
|
FWIW, when we first started looking at 5ers, I was dead set against a dually diesel - didn't want the expense or the size. In fact, I wanted a 3/4 ton gasser. And I had plenty of dealers tell me a 3/4-ton was more than enough for pretty much anything they sold Over time, I did my research and wound up with a diesel dually. I love this truck. It took a day or 2 to get used to the width/length in traffic, but then it's no problem whatsoever. You want way more truck than you need.
__________________
2010 Carriage Carri-Lite 37MSTR 5th Wheel
2014 Ram Tradesman 3500 DRW 4X4 / Cummins 6.7L HO / Aisin
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 06:45 PM
|
#26
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 859
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarryG20
Arctic fox (well northwoods manufacturing)has an owners forum. You might try going there and see if someone has done the scale thing with there 29.5 and give you real world weights. You might try calling the factory as well not a salesman at the rv lot, though they may not have any better knowledge.
Home - Northwood RV Owners Association Forum
|
Thanks. I know about NROA2003 and had a trial or guest membership there some time ago when I first started considering the Arctic Fox. That membership expired and they will not let me join as a full member or otherwise unless and until I purchase an Arctic Fox (or other Northwood product). I think that is a self-defeating policy, but I don't make the rules.
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 06:59 PM
|
#27
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 859
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtomicRT
FWIW, when we first started looking at 5ers, I was dead set against a dually diesel - didn't want the expense or the size. In fact, I wanted a 3/4 ton gasser. And I had plenty of dealers tell me a 3/4-ton was more than enough for pretty much anything they sold Over time, I did my research and wound up with a diesel dually. I love this truck. It took a day or 2 to get used to the width/length in traffic, but then it's no problem whatsoever. You want way more truck than you need.
|
Thanks for that. I'm not concerned so much about driving around as I am about maneuvering in tight places, getting clipped when parked, maneuverability... it may not turn out to be as bad as I expect. On the other had it could be worse! LOL.
Thanks for your 2¢
|
|
|
04-15-2017, 07:53 AM
|
#28
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: out west in the mountains
Posts: 51
|
We have the 2015 Arctic Fox 355Z and pull it with a 2015 Ram 3500 SRW.
The Cargo capacity of the truck is 4430# and the wet pin weight is 3175#
We're not full timers, don't carry much other than supplies for a 2 week trip and do just fine with our setup. If we we're planning on maxing out the carrying capacity of the 5th wheel, I'd definitely opt for the dually.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|