Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > RV SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FORUMS > Technology: Internet, TV, Satellite, Cell Phones, etc.
Click Here to Login
Register FilesVendors Registry Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-09-2020, 08:10 AM   #141
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill B View Post
Just to clarify the external antennas are of no benefit when connecting to the router through the USB WAN port?
External antennas connected to the router would bring the cell signal into the cell modem inside the router. A SIM card would be needed so the modem would work. Then the modem would transfer the signal into a form the router could use and distribute.

Alternatively, the cell signal comes in from a cell phone tethered via usb port on the router. Then the router transfers the signal into a form the router can use and distribute. In this instance the signal bypasses the modem in the router (if router has a cell signal modem).

The cell radio signal is bi-directional and sometimes is using multiple bands for upload and download dependent on how the cell company has their signal bands configured and the ability of the device (cell modem or cell phone) to see and use multiple frequencies/signals at the same time. Cell signal infrastructure now is moving toward sharing of towers and carrier frequency aggreation.
https://youtu.be/SCbN1DgF60g
https://www.towerleases.com/cell-pho...rriers-towers/

Soon there will be another option for celluar data signal:
https://www.sciencealert.com/spacex-...ink-satellites
Mermaid3193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-09-2020, 09:05 AM   #142
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by boyland View Post
i have tried both external antenna and weboost as well as multiple other brands.

Weboost has consistently out performed all the others but a significant portion.

I saw that video sometime back and replicated the testing they were attempting it might work for them on a clear area like water but in the woods obstructions my experience has been weboost wins
We live in the woods and I have figured out lower Hz (lower frequency) radio cell signal travels better through woods. 5G sounds great but it probably won't work for us unless we were traveling in a town that offers it.

Trying to understand WeBoost better data throughput porformance. Any insight?
Mermaid3193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2020, 09:56 AM   #143
Senior Member
 
LarryJB's Avatar




 
Tiffin Owners Club
RV Trip Wizard
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Mountainburg, AR
Posts: 1,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mermaid3193 View Post
We live in the woods and I have figured out lower Hz (lower frequency) radio cell signal travels better through woods. 5G sounds great but it probably won't work for us unless we were traveling in a town that offers it.

Trying to understand WeBoost better data throughput porformance. Any insight?
Just to be clear, the 5Ghz wifi band is NOT the new 5G cell technology that has been in the news lately. None of the cell modems being discussed here are capable of using the new 5G networks. What is being discussed is the 5Ghz wifi band that is common to many wifi routers used to communicate with local devices such as computers, smart TVs and streaming devices such as ROKUs.
__________________
There are 10 types of people... Those that understand binary and those that don't.
_________________________
2018 Tiffin Phaeton 40AH/2018 Hyundai Elantra Sport Toad
LarryJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2020, 06:59 AM   #144
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryJB View Post
Just to be clear, the 5Ghz wifi band is NOT the new 5G cell technology that has been in the news lately. None of the cell modems being discussed here are capable of using the new 5G networks. What is being discussed is the 5Ghz wifi band that is common to many wifi routers used to communicate with local devices such as computers, smart TVs and streaming devices such as ROKUs.
Thank you for clarifying, I see my error. Some cell 5G NR will be at lower MHz frequency which should travel further through wooded areas.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell...cies_in_the_US
The cell phone 5G NR bands, will be implimented in future modem/routers and cell phones. We would like to select our external antennas to include as many bands as possible while still getting a high gain. Technology is changing so fast, future proofing is one of the things we are considering.
Mermaid3193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2020, 07:36 AM   #145
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by az99 View Post
What did you find out about this setup?
I reached out to their techs but no response. I'm not going to spend that much money on a modem until I know more about how to make it work from a technical perspective.
Reggart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2020, 01:35 PM   #146
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggart View Post
I reached out to their techs but no response. I'm not going to spend that much money on a modem until I know more about how to make it work from a technical perspective.
To play with it a bit I bought this router-https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07GBXMBQF/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

It is OpenWRT and dual band with USB. Nice portable.
So I loaded the Rooter firmware to try it using my phone as the USB modem. It does not affect the APN or TTL. So the modem of the other units discussed in this thread must tie to the router differently than the USB does. The manual does lead me to believe that a USB modem will act differently than a tethered phone. I may try one as this router is much better than the KuWfi I had.
az99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2020, 08:36 PM   #147
Senior Member
 
boyland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mermaid3193 View Post
We live in the woods and I have figured out lower Hz (lower frequency) radio cell signal travels better through woods. 5G sounds great but it probably won't work for us unless we were traveling in a town that offers it.

Trying to understand WeBoost better data throughput porformance. Any insight?
I will do a write up on this and the surecall units i have experimented with.

Need to be at my laptop as it is somewhat complicated
__________________
Blaine and Amy (2013 Winnebago Journey 42e)( previous 2002 Winnebago Journey 39dl)
Blog www.rvparttime.com
boyland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2020, 05:29 AM   #148
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,217
Not sure what is going on with KuWfi but I ordered the Cat 6 unit- https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...?ie=UTF8&psc=1. They advertise 3-5 day shipping.
After 11 days I contacted them and they said it would be another 15 days even though their tracking said it shipped. I cancelled it.
Ordered a Sierra Cat 6 and WE 3526 dual band router from LTE Fix. I will post back when I test it. Still less than Mofi and it's dual band.
az99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2020, 01:03 PM   #149
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 45
WeBoost vs External Antennas

Quote:
Originally Posted by boyland View Post
i have tried both external antenna and weboost as well as multiple other brands.

Weboost has consistently out performed all the others but a significant portion.

I saw that video sometime back and replicated the testing they were attempting it might work for them on a clear area like water but in the woods obstructions my experience has been weboost wins
Still trying to figure out if we want to get a WeBoost in addition to the 2 LTE directional external antennas mounted on a pole with the KiWFi Modem. Can you please help us? Was your testing with 1 antenna or 2 antennas placed at a 90 degree angle to each other?
Mermaid3193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2020, 01:52 PM   #150
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mermaid3193 View Post
Found this ltefix.com fourm thread that says there maybe a problem with cell sim channel 4 and horribly slow wifi. It says there is a problem where wifi antenna frequency and one LTE frequency maybe canceling each other out. Called adjacent channel interference. They suggested using channel 11 for wifi. Here is a link to that fourm: https://ltehacks.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&p=1695#p1695

For wifi try mode N, Channel 11, 20MHz.

2.4 GHz Wi-Fi Channel Numbers
Wi-Fi equipment in the U.S. and North America features 11 channels on the 2.4 GHz band: Channel 1 operates at a center frequency of 2.412 GHz. Channel 11 operates at 2.462 GHz. Other channels operate at frequencies in between, evenly spaced at 5 MHz (0.005 GHz) intervals.
I talked to Mark Donovan, Chief Sales Engineering Specialist (803) 419-4702 at ZDA COMMUNICATIONS (Note: The purchase links on their website take you to a different site cause they have been hacked repeatedly by a company outside the USA. Call if you want to talk or purchase from them) and he said that the 2.4Ghz Band Wifi and the Cell Band 4 canceling sould be resolved with running the LTE antennas outside the RV.
Mermaid3193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2020, 04:09 PM   #151
Senior Member
 
boyland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mermaid3193 View Post
Still trying to figure out if we want to get a WeBoost in addition to the 2 LTE directional external antennas mounted on a pole with the KiWFi Modem. Can you please help us? Was your testing with 1 antenna or 2 antennas placed at a 90 degree angle to each other?
I only ever used the yagi style antenna single antenna.

I would consider dual if i had problems but honestly i doubt it gains much more.
__________________
Blaine and Amy (2013 Winnebago Journey 42e)( previous 2002 Winnebago Journey 39dl)
Blog www.rvparttime.com
boyland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2020, 09:07 AM   #152
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by boyland View Post
I only ever used the yagi style antenna single antenna.

I would consider dual if i had problems but honestly i doubt it gains much more.
To be sure I understand: You used a single directional yagi antenna with both your WeBoost and your Cell Modem Router and the WeBoost signal was stronger?
Mermaid3193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2020, 10:02 AM   #153
Senior Member
 
boyland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mermaid3193 View Post
To be sure I understand: You used a single directional yagi antenna with both your WeBoost and your Cell Modem Router and the WeBoost signal was stronger?
Correct i have found the weboost to be better in general.

I am sure there are circumstances where the other would be better but in my results i have seem weboost with single direction yagi to the best option.

Now i do want to add this most of my testing has been at my lake location with very limited signals and speeds from 1.5-8mb testing results the upload speeds generally are none to 1.5.

hope this helps
__________________
Blaine and Amy (2013 Winnebago Journey 42e)( previous 2002 Winnebago Journey 39dl)
Blog www.rvparttime.com
boyland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2020, 11:08 AM   #154
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,217
Afer extremely disappointing results with a WE826 I purchased a WG3526 with a Sierra 7455 modem. It is a dual band router and a Cat 6 modem. Total cost under $250. What a difference. It is night and day in both the LTE reception and the dual band wifi output. Tested with ATT and Verizon.
Absolutey no comparison to the Kuwifi WE826. And still cheaper than the Mofi and it's dual band.
az99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
wifi



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Winegard Connect 2.0 WiFi 4G LTE sirrom26 Technology: Internet, TV, Satellite, Cell Phones, etc. 88 07-08-2019 07:37 PM
WiFi Ranger Upgrades SkyPro and Sky4 LTE Product Lines DriVer RV Industry Press 0 11-08-2018 02:59 PM
Recommendations for Mt. Rainier Camping with Wifi/LTE wfred Outdoors RV Owner's Forum 6 10-01-2018 06:47 AM
The Smart Travel Router: A Globally Compatible Router + Charger Retreever Technology: Internet, TV, Satellite, Cell Phones, etc. 4 11-27-2014 09:11 AM
EVDO WiFi Router & Cell Phone Repeater Jetsmania Technology: Internet, TV, Satellite, Cell Phones, etc. 32 04-10-2007 06:37 PM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.