Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > RV SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FORUMS > Going Green
Click Here to Login
Register FilesVendors Registry Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-02-2013, 07:24 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 92
1 kw solar tracker for RV

Has anyone tried the solar tracker system from Universal Solar? To pull down 1 kw and for most of the day while it tracks is a game changer from all I have seen. With wind retraction it's a nice package.

Universal Solar Solutions
Christian51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 07-02-2013, 08:15 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,607
Pretty pictures and a lot of words, but no concrete info. Prices, sizes, power consumption, weight, mounting instructions, snow loading, warranty, retracted wind speed allowances, etc. Looks like a trial balloon. Promises and a fast talking salesman. How about some INFORMATION.
Pigman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 08:53 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
hdossett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: N. Central AZ
Posts: 548
Don't get me wrong, this would be nice but I could not get past all the bull-hype marketing. They really need to go back to selling the new Sham Wow!

I really liked the lines ..."2-400 watt panels would produce 1KW of power if it was on their system"... really!!


and ..."The air conditioner?? Forget about it. You need to have a large inverter say 3000 watts or more. And you would need a big enough battery bank to run that big of an inverter."

...what you don't need them with their system??


And the best one ..."
just get the Solar Seeker tracking system and add your panels then you will have a tracking system. This will increase your current power 10 fold.
"

Well, I have see the research, at most dual axis tracking will increase output by 38% over flat panel installation! Not 1,000%!
And where I live I need near 60 degree tilt for maximum winter output, they only go 45 degrees!

I think there was a reason that 45 footer was sitting next to a 50 Amp hookup!


If you look at the large system going in now, more fixed panels are going in because that is more cost effective than tracking! (Unless real estate is limited.)


H (who full time boondocked on solar for a few years)




__________________
'01 National RV Tropi-Cal, Ford V10, '01 Suzuki GV 4X4 Blue Ox Tow Bar,300 Watts Solar, 2500 Watt '458' Inverter, NO TVs, Most light fixtures upgraded to LEDs

hdossett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 12:23 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 92
Well it will be interesting to look into. I'm going to have a lot of power needs and the Prevost I am looking at will need beefed up. This system is also worth some study Global Solar Energy - POWER the Possibilities but just flat panels haven't impressed me so far. Most are little more than battery ticklers. Even this system would just beef your batteries while away during the day but it would still take a good load off the gen. It is easy to study by finding out what panels they are using. Beyond that if the tracker works and is built to take the strain then it could be the most effective I've seen. One could buy your own panels so why wouldn't it work? It's not rocket science to build a good tracker. There are a lot of tracking systems to compare power production charts so one doesn't need to rely only on what they say. Interesting to find out!
Christian51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 08:00 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
hdossett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: N. Central AZ
Posts: 548
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdossett View Post

Well, I have see the research, at most dual axis tracking will increase output by 38% over flat panel installation! Not 1,000%!
And where I live I need near 60 degree tilt for maximum winter output, they only go 45 degrees!
That should have been "fixed mounted installation", fixed to degree of latitude. So the increase over flat would be greater, on an annual basis but only a few percentage points.


H.
__________________
'01 National RV Tropi-Cal, Ford V10, '01 Suzuki GV 4X4 Blue Ox Tow Bar,300 Watts Solar, 2500 Watt '458' Inverter, NO TVs, Most light fixtures upgraded to LEDs

hdossett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2013, 11:34 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Rio Verde and Show Low AZ
Posts: 136
I'm going with no way will a tracker pay for itself over simply having more panels than you need. Especially on a bus where you have tons of real estate to work with. If you park in one place for long periods you can build a simple method to articulate the panels to some degree. In the winter months this becomes more important. Getting some tilt on the panels will help a bunch if you have your rig parked in such a way as to take advantage of that. A tracker would eliminate the need to park in a certain way. But what about securing it during take off and landing? And the weight? I just don't think so.

I have my panels flat on the roof (OK, more or less flat they do have a bit of tilt toward the rear of the rig). In the summer months I'm charged from 70% to full usually by noon. In the winter it takes until about 2:00 PM (in Arizona). I have 735 watts. In summer, I can see the max 60 amps the controller can handle. In the winter I've seen maybe 45 amps (I'm usually charged or at least beyond bulk before the sun is directly overhead).

The key is having "enough" solar to do the job you want to do. Maximizing the potential is nice but not a goal. Certainly not at the expense of cost. For most applications if you can get 750W you are good. If you need more you have to double up on controllers anyway. And you would have to have a huge battery bank. I would start my design from how much power I need during non daylight hours, figure out how many batteries that is and then figure out how to charge them during daylight. If your rig is small you may have a real estate problem. If your rig is big, probably not. Then it's a matter of cost effectiveness.

My blog (URL below) has a number of installs including my own 735W system.
__________________
2018 Leisure Travel Wonder FTB
https://cuernoverdesolar.wordpress.com/
kellylipp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2013, 01:34 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
PyrateSilly's Avatar
 
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,200
EarthRoamer » Solar Power

Try this for solar .... lol
__________________
Thom and Christine having fun in a 1993 Monaco Crown Royale Signature Series 40ft 300hp RV. Towing a Fiat 500 Abarth and a Harley.
Our blogged repairs and travels
PyrateSilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2013, 01:53 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
vsheetz's Avatar


 
Fleetwood Owners Club
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 15,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by kellylipp View Post
The key is having "enough" solar to do the job you want to do. Maximizing the potential is nice but not a goal. Certainly not at the expense of cost. For most applications if you can get 750W you are good. If you need more you have to double up on controllers anyway. And you would have to have a huge battery bank. I would start my design from how much power I need during non daylight hours, figure out how many batteries that is and then figure out how to charge them during daylight. If your rig is small you may have a real estate problem. If your rig is big, probably not. Then it's a matter of cost effectiveness.
__________________
Vince and Susan
2011 Tiffin Phaeton 40QTH (Cummins ISC/Freightliner)
Flat towing a modified 2005 Jeep (Rubicon Wrangler)
Previously a 2002 Fleetwood Pace Arrow 37A and a 1995 Safari Trek 2830.
vsheetz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2013, 09:38 AM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 92
thanks for the info guys. I'm looking at a 45 footer to install solar so making room for 750 watts or more shouldn't be to much of a problem. I plan on adding solar and converting to Lithium batteries in the process. I don't want the wife griping that she can't do something cause the batteries aren't charged and running the gen isn't allowed.
Christian51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2013, 09:55 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: somewhere in the west
Posts: 1,168
Back when solar panels were running five bucks a watt, a tracker was considered optimum for getting all you can from the panels.

Now that panels are in the $1 to 1.25 range, and the output of panels being higher, and the use of MPPT technology is with us, tracking has become obsolete for most people.

I have a 35 foot RV and have 1200 watts on the roof. If my battery bank is not full before noon, it's probably due to dark, heavy overcast.

Used to be that the period between 10 AM, and 2 PM were the optimal periods for solar (and still is in reality), but most people that have a sufficient system, find that they are topped off before noon on even low light days.

Ed
Ed-Sommers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2013, 05:30 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 949
Solar is down to $.50/watt. Talked with son (who is in solar business) about being able to tilt and he said that the cost is so low that it is cheaper and a lot safer to just add panels. We have 1420 W and have charged (through controller) at 1150 and 1200 but that was with sun dead overhead. We can generally get 900 W from 11 am to 3 pm in winter. We do run the fridge off the inverter on sunny days and have inadvertently run it overnight but that drops us to -3000 w-hours by morning. This is no problem if the next day is sunny. We can run fridge off inverter on winter sunny days for about seven hours.

Have discussed absolute satisfaction with LFP on other threads (9.72 kw-hours for 160#). The two (plus PSW inverter) are excellent combination. We have gone 5 months without generator or shore power)
Reed and Elaine Cundiff
Reed Cundiff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2013, 07:43 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
terry735001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,177
Blog Entries: 11
just go to redrock and get the parts to make your own system

i only payed 99$ usd for all the ECM parts and controllers

under 100$ for 2 DC motors and made a frame i had 15... yes 15.. 90 watt panels installed on the syetem here in FL to track the sun this ran my stick home

but after becoming a full timer this system was moved to the RV with out the tracker as just the panels alone was 1200 lbs

have pics if any one wants to see of making this monster
terry735001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
solar



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.