Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > RV SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FORUMS > Going Green
Click Here to Login
Register FilesVendors Registry Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 05-26-2009, 08:55 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
MtManLee's Avatar
Official iRV2 Sponsor
 
Monaco Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 611
Entrepreneur pushes idea of air-powered cars

Entrepreneur pushes idea of air-powered cars
Critics say energy needed makes them impractical compared to electrics
NEW YORK - Most car companies are racing to bring electric vehicles to the market. But one startup is skipping the high-tech electronics, making cars whose energy source is pulled literally out of thin air.
Zero Pollution Motors is trying to bring a car to U.S. roads by early 2011 that's powered by a combination of compressed air and a small conventional engine.


LENGTH: 13.4 feet
WIDTH: 5.97 feet
HEIGHT: 5.74 feet
SEATING: 6 seats
TRUNK VOLUME: 35 cubic feet
WEIGHT: 1,874 pounds
ENGINE: 6-cylinder
POWER SOURCE: Electronically injected compressed air
HORSEPOWER: 75 hp
MAXIMUM SPEED: 96 mph (estimated)
FUEL ECONOMY: 106 miles per gallon (estimated)
RANGE: 848 miles (estimated, 8 gallon tank)
AIR TANK CAPACITY: 3,200 cubic feet at 4,500 psi
CHARGER: On-board 5.5-kilowatt, 110-/220-volt compressor generating 812 cubic feet per hour.
TRANSMISSION: Automatic, continually variable transmission; rear-wheel drive
SUSPENSION: Front coil spring, rear pneumatic
STEERING: Rack-and-pinion
CHASSIS AND BODY MATERIALS: Aluminum and fiberglass
TANKS: Thermoplastic lining and carbon-fiber




ZPM Chief Executive Shiva Vencat said the ultimate goal is a price tag between $18,000 and $20,000, fuel economy equivalent to 100 miles per gallon and a tailpipe that emits nothing but air at low enough speeds.
Elsewhere in the world, the technology is already gaining speed. The French startup Motor Development International, which licensed the technology to ZPM, unveiled a new air-powered car at the Geneva Auto Show in March. Airlines KLM and Air France are starting to test the bubble-shaped AirPod this month for use as transportation around airports.
Engineering experts, however, are skeptical of the technology, saying it is clouded by the caveat that compressing air is notoriously energy intensive.
"Air compressors are one of the least efficient machines to convert electricity to work," said Harold Kung, professor of chemical and biological engineering at Northwestern University. "Why not use the electricity directly, as in electric cars? From an energy utilization point of view, the compressed (air) car does not make sense."
As Vencat spells it out, the "air cars" plug into a wall outlet, allowing an on-board compressor to pressurize the car's air tank to 4,500 pounds per square inch. It takes about four hours to get the tank to full pressure, then the air is then released gradually to power the car's pistons.
At speeds less than 35 mph, the car relies entirely on the air tank and emits only cold air. At faster speeds, a small conventionally fueled engine kicks in to run a heater that warms the air and speeds its release. The engine also refills the air tank, extending the range and speed.
The technology behind the car was developed by the French race car engineer Guy Negre, head of Motor Development International. Besides ZPM, Negre has licensed the technology to Indian car giant Tata Motors and others.
Many of the specifications of ZPM's car are still speculative, but Vencat expects it to go about 20 miles on compressed air alone, and hundreds more after the engine kicks in, with a top speed of 96 mph.
The technology shouldn't sound too outlandish, Vencat said. It's similar to the internal-combustion engines in conventional cars — the main difference is the fuel.
"Every single car you see out there, except an electric car, is a compressed-air car," he said. "It takes air in the chamber and it pushes the piston, and the only way you push the piston is through pressure."
James Van de Ven, a mechanical engineering assistant professor at Worcester Polytechnic Institute who has studied compressed-air technology, said air compressors allow you to recover only 25 to 30 percent of the energy used to compress the air. The rest is lost through heat, air leakage and other forms of waste, he said.
While that's still slightly better a gasoline engine, it pales compared with the efficiencies of other alternative-fuel powertrains, like those in hybrid-electric cars, which have an efficiency closer to 80 percent, Van de Ven said.
A look at some of ZPM's specifications illustrates the issue. With four hours of charging, the air car's 5.5-kilowatt compressor would eat up 22 kilowatt-hours of electricity. That means the same energy used to turn on 10 100-watt light bulbs for 22 hours would allow the car to travel 20 miles.
By comparison, General Motors Corp. has said its Chevrolet Volt will use about 8 kilowatt-hours of energy to fully charge, and it will be able to travel 40 miles on battery power alone.
George Haley, business professor at the University of New Haven, said U.S. safety regulations could be another obstacle given the air car's tiny size and light weight.
Vencat said he gets such criticism "from the whole wide world" and pays it little mind. He counters that the car is cleaner than any internal combustion engine and remarkably simpler — and cheaper — than more advanced powertrains currently under development.
"The big difference is that the (Chevrolet) Volt needs the battery," Vencat said. The Volt's massive lithium-ion battery is a big part of the reason it is expected to cost about $40,000 when it goes on sale late next year.
He acknowledges the difficulties with getting the car out quickly but said he is lining up investors.
"You know, we've got a lot of people who wanted the car yesterday," he said.
__________________
Lee and Fran
Holiday Rambler Vacationer
While traveling down lives paths stop to smell the flowers.
MtManLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 05-26-2009, 09:52 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Auburn, CA, Havasu, AZ & Mulege, BCS
Posts: 5,385
This would work in Washington where hot air is the solution for everything.
__________________
Baja-tested '08 2-slide 36'
Alpine: The Ultimate DIY'er Project
EngineerMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 09:47 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Ray,IN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North America somewhere
Posts: 30,903
"3,200cu/ft at 4,500psi" That's some time bomb waiting to happen. All it takes is one crash to puncture the tank, and the car may land a few counties away.
__________________
2000 Winnebago Ultimate Freedom USQ40JD, ISC 8.3 Cummins 350, Spartan MM Chassis. USA IN 1SG 11B5MX,Infantry retired;Good Sam Life member,FMCA." My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country. John F. Kennedy
Ray,IN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2009, 10:16 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Littleton Colorado
Posts: 42
I have seen the french version on TV and the internet. It is an interesting concept that deserves some more research to see if it has any legs. The car is small! but so is a smart car and you see people driving those things on the highway all the time (death trap). maybe with legislation, they could make these types of cars "city cars", perhaps restricting them from highways or some such thing. it gets messy from there.
__________________
The Killens

2004 BigFoot 29SL
Bill Killen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2009, 10:32 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Wicked Whippets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 227
No crazier than the hydrogen fuel cell concept!
__________________
7 championship show dogs www.bauhauskennels.com
04 Winnie Vectra 40AD / 05 Jeep Rubicon TOAD / 03 BMW R1150RT
Wicked Whippets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 03:16 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Palisade CO
Posts: 3,588
It takes energy to compress the air-as much as it takes to move the car plus losses in the car and the compressor. That is a net loss so I don't see the benefit from an economic stand point. Maybe I am missing something.

Regarding the 4500 psi tanks. My scuba tanks are filled to 3200 psi. Scuba tanks are smaller than the tank for the car but have been relatively safe to transport and fill.
There have been a couple of horrendous accidents while scuba tanks were being filled.
They have to be inspected each year with an eddy current device and re-certified every five years and the last time I had mine re-certified the cost was about $75 as I recall.
__________________
Clay WA5NMR - Ex Snowbird - 1 year, Ex Full timer for 11 years - 2004 Winnebago Sightseer 35N Workhorse chassis. Honda Accord toad.
Clay L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 07:03 PM   #7
Moderator Emeritus
 
TXiceman's Avatar
 
Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bryan, TX when not traveling.
Posts: 22,948
Blog Entries: 21
You need to look at the total carbon foot print. It takes energy with a defined efficiency to run the engine to run the compressor to pump the air. The compressor has pumping losses so that adds some more efficiency. Now you have to expand the air to drive a piston expander or a turbine expander. You still have to add the losses in the transmission.

I don't think this is a viable answer.

Ken
__________________
Amateur Radio Operator (KE5DFR)|No Longer Full-Time! - 2023 Cougar 22MLS toted by 2022 F150, 3.5L EcoBoost Tow Max FX4 Lariat Travel with one Standard Schnauzer and one small Timneh African Gray Parrot, retired mechanical engineer
TXiceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low Air Warning jhanan Freightliner Motorhome Chassis Forum 20 10-07-2012 05:54 PM
Haldex Air Dryer Rebuild quikduk Spartan Motorhome Chassis Forum 6 09-03-2011 04:14 AM
Dumping Air for a Temporary Period? OldForester Alpine Coach Owner's Forum 25 12-04-2008 07:18 PM
Air horns will not work gerdathome Newmar Owner's Forum 2 07-13-2008 04:46 PM
Just Installed SMI AIR FORCE ONE Brakes Dutch Star Don Monaco Owner's Forum 11 10-18-2007 03:30 PM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.