Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > COMMUNITY FORUMS > General Discussion
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-09-2012, 09:42 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1
Cummins 380 vs Maxxforce 10

Can anyone tell me how these engines compare? Looking at the 40' Holiday Rambler and the 40' Tiffin Phaeton QTH
Interested in which one has the most power and gas mileage.
charlibrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free! RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-09-2012, 09:50 PM   #2
Senior Member
Mr_D's Avatar
Country Coach Owners Club
Solo Rvers Club
iRV2 No Limits Club
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 37,726
I hope you never try to get "gas" mileage out of either one!!
2009 45' Magna 630 w/Cummins ISX 650 HP/1950 Lbs Ft, HWH Active Air
Charter Good Sam Lifetime Member, FMCA,
RV'ing since 1957, NRA Benefactor Life, towing '21 Jeep JLU Rubicon Ecodiesel
Mr_D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 09:16 AM   #3
Senior Member
historyljc's Avatar
Tiffin Owners Club
Freightliner Owners Club
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 5,173
You might wish to look at the discussion on the FMCA site concerning these two engines: Cummins vs MaxxForce - FMCA Motorhome Forums
Travel well, travel safe,
2006 Tiffin Phaeton - 2011 Cadillac SRX
historyljc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 09:27 AM   #4
Moderator Emeritus
Gary RVRoamer's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: West Palm Beach, FL. USA
Posts: 26,749
The standard engine in the Phaeton is the Cummins ISC 8.3L with 380 hp and 1050 lb-ft of torque. You can find further specs on the Cummins website. Make sure you refer to the specs for the RV/motorhome application rather than something else.

The Navistar MaxxForce 10 (9.3L) in the Holiday is 350 hp and 1150 lb-ft of torque.

So the Cummins has more horsepower but the torque peak on the Maxxforce is higher.

Personally, I'd go for the higher horsepower if that was the only difference between the two coaches. That's rarely the case, though. There are probably many other factors that are at least as important as the two engines.
Gary Brinck
Former owner of 2004 American Tradition and several other RVs
Home is West Palm Beach, FL
Gary RVRoamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 09:39 AM   #5
Senior Member
R2Home's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Palmer Ak
Posts: 1,136
I too would like to know what the difference between these two engines is. The DW would like to upgrade our MH and I would like to have another Cummins engine. Is the Max force a 'V' or inline engine and what is the weight difference? At what RPM's do the engine run? While it may be true that there are other factors to consider when getting a MH, the engine is a 'major' factor for me.
2009 38' Diplomat
CSM- retired, wife as co-pilot
Reka & Ali providing security (our 2 labs)
R2Home is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 09:47 AM   #6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 119
Brett Wolfe wrote a great summary there. He is a fellow Foretravel owner and the head of the Cat forum and Cat engine group. I think that the Maxxforce engine does not require DEF fluid but I read that is changing. Also, the big issue is service. I am sure they all can service it but Cummins has a niche in Motorhomes and services them more often. I do not think I would let Maxxforce or Cummins be the deciding factor though in a 40 footer I would want a bigger engine period.... especially if you have slides. I had a ISC in a 34 foot none slide Foretravel then moved up to a 450 ISM and the difference was night and day. Cruising RPMs on the ISC was 1900 vs 1300. I think you are on the low end of the power to weight ration with either of these units. Not a huge issue if you do not drive much but if you do put on more than 10K miles you might have an easier time with a larger engine. I get 8 on the flat land and 7.5 over 4000 miles covering 1400 miles of mountain driving with teh ISM. It is not made any longer for road applications but the smaller 11L ISX is. But if you are going to be in the flat lands and are not goign to drive much I would not worry too much about engine size.
42' Foretravel U320

24' Bornfree
John S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 10:21 AM   #7
Moderator Emeritus
Gary RVRoamer's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: West Palm Beach, FL. USA
Posts: 26,749
The Maxforce 10 is a 9.3L, inline 6 cylinder, just like the Cummins ISL (8.3L) and ISC (8.9L). Navistar doesn't give a lot of spec info on their website, but here's the link:

Motorhome - MaxxForce® 10 | MaxxForce

On the Navistar motorhome application page, they list the Maxxforce 10 as ranging from 310-405 hp and 1050-1250 lb-ft of torque, so make sure you know which configuration is in any motorhome you are considering to buy.

Motorhome Engines | MaxxForce
Gary Brinck
Former owner of 2004 American Tradition and several other RVs
Home is West Palm Beach, FL
Gary RVRoamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 11:48 AM   #8
Senior Member
Steve Ownby's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cosby, Tn
Posts: 6,587
I currently own a Cummins and am very happy with it, but I would not hesitate to buy a motor home with a MF10 as the power. The MF10 is a full liter larger than the ISC and just under 1/2 liter larger than the ISL. Its power curve is lower than the Cummins so generally rpms are going to be lower depending of course on the final drive ratio used.

Divide the GVWR + toad weight by the horsepower on both coaches. The one with the fewer pounds per hp will be the better performer. This is really just an exercise however. The relative performance of both should be very close.

The chassis of these coaches are completely different and you should look at that and the quality of the house.
Steve Ownby
Full time since 2007
2003 Monaco Signature
Steve Ownby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 02:11 PM   #9
Senior Member
Cat320's Avatar
Fleetwood Owners Club
American Coach Owners Club
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,649
If the engine was the ONLY factor in making a decision, I'd go with the Cummins simply because there are so many more of them in MHs. However, if you like the coach with the Maxxforce 10 much better...get it, that engine will do all right.
2014 American Eagle 45T
DD 13, 500 HP
Pulling a Honda CRV
Cat320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 08:23 PM   #10
Senior Member
pwf16129's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 267
run from the max force engine we have several thousand and that is not a typo in our fleet they are not dependable hard to work on very expensive to repair we are running the max force 13 but they are basically the same engine.
egr valve failures,egr cooler failures,turbo problems,software issues,we are fighting this every day at times we have forty percent of our fleet down we bought them because they did not need def fluid and now they are looking to go back to Cummings engines.
we ran several thousand of these with really good success but our truck suppler dropped them in place of their max force engine.
just what we deal with on a daily basis
pwf16129 is offline   Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.