|
04-30-2005, 10:11 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southern CALIF.
Posts: 89
|
Found this
__________________
2005 Ford F-250 FX4 PSD Crew Cab
2004 Jeep Wrangler 4X4
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
04-30-2005, 10:11 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southern CALIF.
Posts: 89
|
Found this
__________________
2005 Ford F-250 FX4 PSD Crew Cab
2004 Jeep Wrangler 4X4
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 04:29 PM
|
#3
|
Guest
|
As you can clearly read, it does not mention or include MotorHomes or RV Vehicles.
Now, if you want to drive a bus, truck, tractor trailer combination and you reside in California, you better have a CDL
Tomcat F15
|
|
|
05-01-2005, 08:03 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NV
Posts: 2,065
|
an interesting catch cboh1
and as a responder to you stated, although "it does not mention or include MotorHomes or RV Vehicles"
the full code DOES however mention that it is for
"..this division refer exclusively to the size and weight of, and loads upon, vehicles when operated upon the highways. ..." (all vehicles except emergency vehicles), thereby implying it IS for Motorhomes and RVs.
I can't imagine that 2" is against the INTENT of that code, but it is still an interesting point.
related:
someone else here found in the CA DMV code the licensing requirements for trailer weights up to 15,000 pounds. it is written a bit confusing. After reading it a handful of times, i feel a Class C license is good for a 5er up to 15000 and does NOT require a special endorsement or a non-commercial A license.
__________________
F350 PSD 4x4 SRW, BanksBrake, FOX res shocks, MagHytec, DP tuner, JohnWood tranny;
ChrisCraft Launch VP8.1 ;
3 hound dogs
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 07:50 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Enoch, Utah
Posts: 716
|
It also may be a revenue generator for some small communities.
Chet
__________________
1999 Holiday Rambler Endeavor 37WDS
2003 Honda Goldwing Trike
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 05:12 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 125
|
FatDog,
Your interpretation in regards to special RV endorsement for a class c California drivers license is incorrect. If the trailer weight is greater than 10,000 lbs but less than 15,000 lbs, a RV Trailer endorsement is required for a class c license. If the weight of the trailer is over 15,000 lbs, then a class a non-commercial license is required.
As for the post regarding pneumatic tires, I dont think that you should have anything to worry about. I doubt if anyone would ever check to see how wide an RV is.
__________________
Don W.
2002 Chevy 2500HD CC/LB D/A
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 05:48 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NV
Posts: 2,065
|
baddwalk, i think we just had this conversation a month or two ago, and i'm wondering if maybe i may have glossed over the results of our conversation. At any rate, i am going to DMV on Thursday regarding this and will question/converse/apply with them on this until i am A-OK.
there just might be one more letter on my license this week
__________________
F350 PSD 4x4 SRW, BanksBrake, FOX res shocks, MagHytec, DP tuner, JohnWood tranny;
ChrisCraft Launch VP8.1 ;
3 hound dogs
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 06:08 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Yucaipa, CA
Posts: 3,478
|
FD:
I'm afraid baddwalks'd correct...we checked on this years ago, and anything over 15klb you need an endorsement...but as I've stated in another thread, I'm not quite sure there's anyone who would know that's the fact. When in doubt, my best friend has a great rule- don't break two laws at the same time!
|
|
|
05-06-2005, 04:29 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 186
|
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">My Adventurer is 104" wide. That means a Wide Load Sign. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Is it really - The Winnebago site lists the 2004 and 2005 Adventurer as 8'6'' wide or 102". The 2001, 2002 and 2003 are listed as 8'5.5" wide or 101.5".
Maybe older units are wider I just don't know
PHE
|
|
|
05-06-2005, 11:51 PM
|
#10
|
Moderator Emeritus
Country Coach Owners Club Appalachian Campers Gulf Streamers Club
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Chattanooga, Tn.
Posts: 12,060
|
PHE, first let me say welcome to iRV2.com. Glad to have you join us here. We look forward to reading of your adventures and experiences. If we can be of any help just ask.
__________________
Mike, RVIA & RVSA Certified Master RV Technician
Amy, Dr. Assistant - Roxie & Mei Ling, four legs each
2000 Gulf Stream Scenic Cruiser 450 hp & 1330# torque
06 Saturn Vue, 06 Chevy Z71 4x4 & 2014 Corvette Z51 M7
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|