02-15-2010, 05:43 PM
|
#43
|
Senior Member
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 460
|
FWIW IANE With all due respect, I do not agree that filling with 100% nitrogen is the same as filling with air. When you have a chance to monitor the pressure as you drive it is very clear there IS a difference - as defined by "The laws of Physics." Not all matter has the same coefficient of expansion and contraction. I also agree that it might not make a "Hill of Beans" in the final analysis when it comes to operating a MH. But it sure does have advantages and it is Not Just Hot Air. Along the same lines, I have wondered if the Tire Charts address Air and 100% Nitrogen? If Nitrogen pressure does Not rise with operation are we under-inflating by using the Air Chart? I see a 10 to 15% rise with Air and less than 2% with 100% Nitrogen.
__________________
2005 Monaco Knight, 3 Slide, 38' PST, Cummins 330 ISC, 34,000 miles on this one!
VMSpc, PressurePro, BrakeSwitch, DeLorme SA2010
2005 Honda CRV, Blue Ox, SMI Brake, TomTom Go 720
|
|
|