Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > iRV2.com COMMUNITY FORUMS > Just Conversation
Click Here to Login
Register FilesVendors Registry Blogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-18-2013, 03:17 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
PyrateSilly's Avatar
 
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,200
Here's a dissenting point of view ...

So over 55 parks are ok but parks that don't allow rv's over 10 yrs old or parks that only allow class a's aren't ok? So how come one is ok but the others get ripped to shreds?

Just curious.
__________________
Thom and Christine having fun in a 1993 Monaco Crown Royale Signature Series 40ft 300hp RV. Towing a Fiat 500 Abarth and a Harley.
Our blogged repairs and travels
PyrateSilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-18-2013, 06:47 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
vanbuskirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Kutztown, PA
Posts: 471
Choosing a campground is no different than choosing a restaurant or movie. There are thousands to choose from and your selection will greatly depend on your mood or requirements for that particular stay. If we are traveling alone we might choose a 55+ park, traveling with our grandchildren we would seek a family resort and sometimes we simply choose by geographic location and convenience. I get so tired of reading posts in which people feel the need to impose their likes and dislikes on others when all they need to do is make a choice. And now I will get off my soapbox...
__________________
Brian and Kim VanBuskirk
2008 Damon Tuscany 40 DP
Tow: 20" Trailer with Classic C3 Corvettes
Car Dolly: Mini Cooper Clubman
vanbuskirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 09:03 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
spritz's Avatar
 
Vintage RV Owners Club
Fleetwood Owners Club
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: c above
Posts: 5,525
I think I would prefer 55+ parks. I have never stayed in one but we are not used to children. Of course I not saying some of the 55+ are just as bad. Walking in you space,like right by the windows, How rude.
__________________
1982 Pace Arrow P30 454
KarKaddy SS, Toad: 2009 Genesis
Tim, Joe and Lilly too. Mpls Minn.
spritz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 06:26 AM   #32
Senior Member
 
GaryKD's Avatar
 
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wellington, Florida
Posts: 13,599
Hi PyrateSilly,
Can you explain your post a bit more? For me, a property can make any rules they want to make. Whatever the rules are it is okay with me. Like vanbuskirk posted, it's a choice. Be happy with whatever choice one makes. However, don't whine and cry about the choice someone else makes. There is no right or wrong on this topic.
__________________
Gary
2005 Newmar KSDP 3910 + GMC ENVOY XUV 37K lbs Moving Down The Road
The Avatar Is Many Times Around The USA
Nobody Knows Your Coach Like Somebody Who Owns One Just Like Yours
GaryKD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 06:32 AM   #33
Senior Member
 
hondavalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 238
Birds of a feather flock together
hondavalk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 07:17 AM   #34
Senior Member
 
PyrateSilly's Avatar
 
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryKD View Post
Hi PyrateSilly,
Can you explain your post a bit more? For me, a property can make any rules they want to make. Whatever the rules are it is okay with me. Like vanbuskirk posted, it's a choice. Be happy with whatever choice one makes. However, don't whine and cry about the choice someone else makes. There is no right or wrong on this topic.
I have read lots of posts on this forum and "the other one" about a CG not allowing a rig over 10 yrs old. The comments pile on about how "dumb that is and I would never stay there" and then people ask which CG so they can call and complain.
I have also read lots where people pile on about how could a CG exclude TT's and only want Class A's.
Sometimes the comments have gotten really rude too on those.
There's a CG near us that will allow just about anyone to stay overnight but if you want to stay a week or a month than you need to show your registration to prove the rig is not older than 15 yrs. They can do what they like and we have no reason to complain. That is their business.
__________________
Thom and Christine having fun in a 1993 Monaco Crown Royale Signature Series 40ft 300hp RV. Towing a Fiat 500 Abarth and a Harley.
Our blogged repairs and travels
PyrateSilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 07:21 AM   #35
Senior Member
 
sadrand's Avatar
 
Monaco Owners Club
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by PyrateSilly View Post
Here's a dissenting point of view ...

So over 55 parks are ok but parks that don't allow rv's over 10 yrs old or parks that only allow class a's aren't ok? So how come one is ok but the others get ripped to shreds?

Just curious.
I think it is because the 10 year rule hits some people as class discrimination - it seems to imply that people with lots of money are better than people that don't have much money. In other words, if you don't have enough money to have a new motor home you are not good enough to stay here. the over 55 rule doesn't have anything to do with how much money you have. IMO that's why the over 10 year rule angers some people that are ok with the over 55 rule.
__________________
Richard Anderson
2002 Beaver Monterey Seacliff, '13 Jeep Wrangler
Retired, fulltimer
sadrand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 08:25 AM   #36
Senior Member
 
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Northwestern Montana
Posts: 3,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by sadrand View Post
I think it is because the 10 year rule hits some people as class discrimination - it seems to imply that people with lots of money are better than people that don't have much money. In other words, if you don't have enough money to have a new motor home you are not good enough to stay here. the over 55 rule doesn't have anything to do with how much money you have. IMO that's why the over 10 year rule angers some people that are ok with the over 55 rule.



This seems like a very logical explanation, I totally agree.
__________________
Dieselclacker
dieselclacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 08:42 AM   #37
Senior Member
 
SeeTheUSA's Avatar
 
Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,481
Here's a clue .... things may not always meet any particular person's definition of fair. For some, there are counselors for that reality.
__________________
Warren and Debbie, Deep in The Heart of Texas
2018 Winnebago View 24D
2014 Tiffin Breeze 32BR, 2012 Winnebago Navion 24G, 2006 Winnebago View 23H
SeeTheUSA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 08:58 AM   #38
Senior Member
 
lakewoodpaul's Avatar
 
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lakewood Ohio
Posts: 568
If You want to feel OLD try staying in a +55 park. But its there business we just dont go to them. During my working years I had many service calls at nursing homes and assisted living complexes and +55 parks remind me of those places. I hope to stay away from that enviroment as long as I can.
__________________
WIT# 34347
lakewoodpaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 09:59 AM   #39
Moderator Emeritus
 
SarahW's Avatar


 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In a lawnchair
Posts: 11,993
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvjimmy View Post
I'm 60 guess it's ok for me to go in and turn it loose. Jim
__________________
SarahW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 10:06 AM   #40
Senior Member
 
nforus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 786
The 55+ parks cater to folks who want a quieter more relaxed environment and that makes perfect sense. At 56 I have no problem getting in, however DW has a few years to go before she crosses the threshold. She's very well behaved, won't steal the toilet paper from the bathroom, and rarely rides her Big Wheel anymore but alas, she is unfit for this environment. Never thought I would be looking for a fake ID this far down the line.
__________________
2013 Polaris RZR 4/900
Location: Colorado
nforus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 04:57 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Northwestern Montana
Posts: 3,514
nforus,

A gray wig and a walking cane will probably suffice for your wife being underage and inelegible for the 55 plus parks.
__________________
Dieselclacker
dieselclacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 05:05 PM   #42
Senior Member
 
palehorse89's Avatar
 
Newmar Owners Club
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by dieselclacker View Post
nforus,

A gray wig and a walking cane will probably suffice for your wife being underage and inelegible for the 55 plus parks.
After thinking about this......toss a long haired blonde hair chunk on her, short skirt, heels, make up, even give her a new name....etc. and just tell them she is your long lost daughter and your wife had just left you
: dance:
__________________
2012 Essex 4544 2011 Jeep JK, M&G Braking, 2014 MTI 27' Hog Hauler, Wireless brake control, 2006 Ultra & 1989 Springer, 2003 Harley-Davidson
FLHR Road King Anniversary
palehorse89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.