Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > iRV2.com COMMUNITY FORUMS > Vintage RV's
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-29-2023, 11:49 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 13
Still shopping...

For a motor home. I have noticed that most of the MH I have seen have a large block 4xx cid in them. A 383 cid stoker has more horsepower and torque - even without maxing the 383 but weighs about half as much. Is there a reason for the big block? Dumping 400 pounds sounds really good.



Most of the MH I see for sale (1978-1985) are Fords. Does Ford have a durable 4 speed automatic transmission with overdrive that DOES NOT need a computer?
Desertprep is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-29-2023, 12:07 PM   #2
Member
 
matcoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Livingston, Texas
Posts: 70
It's all about torque, not cubic inches. The big block should be your choice.
__________________
Richard (& Nancy, too!)
Livingston, Texas
2009 43' Allegro Bus QRP
matcoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2023, 02:22 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: oregon
Posts: 626
Don't let pop culture advertising sway you from a big block. GM big factory BB's are grossly underrated as to hp/tq. To use modern measurement standards think 330 up and about 450 ft lbs of torque.

What 383 has that much torque...in a usable power band. In a rv 4000 rpm pretty much the end...
EyezOpen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2023, 02:30 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Flyer15015's Avatar
 
Fleetwood Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: On the continental divide
Posts: 1,632
Old saying that still rings true.

"There's no substitute for cubic inches".

Applies to gas OR diesel.

JMHO
Mike in Colorado
__________________
2004 Fleetwood Pace Arrow 37c, 8.1 gasser, (Jezebel) Ultra RV ECM / TCM and rear track bar, PPE deep Tx pan, Bilstein's, Sailun's & Sumo's all round, pushed by a 2002 Grand Caravan, on a Master Tow Dolly.
Flyer15015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2023, 06:35 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Maine
Posts: 219
not to mention the durability of a big block Chevy for hauling a heavy load it's entire life.
__________________
1986 Itasca Sunflyer 22 ft P32 chassis with 454 engine
cadillac_al is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2023, 08:48 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
GypsyR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,477
A Hotrod magazine type 383 stoker will be cammed up to put a fairly lightweight car through a quarter mile quickly. Useless in a big heavy RV. You want slow revving tractor type torque. First really steep hill you have to climb you'll get it. Consider an RV a very heavily loaded truck that never gets to unload, ever.

Years ago it was the "70's lesson". During the gas crunch back then people thought to order/build RV's with smaller engines, like small block Chevys. They found they weren't up to the task. To make similar power to a big block you have to rev one almost twice as high. Gas mileage was NOT better like that and engine durability was poor. Some folks went as far as to throw the small block setup out and swap in the biggest engine they could find. It's just how it works.
GypsyR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2023, 01:10 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 13
Thank you! Now...has anyone ever used a Chevy bb to replace a Ford bb? I like the selection of transmissions that Chevy has to offer for muscle.
Desertprep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2023, 06:05 AM   #8
Member
 
matcoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Livingston, Texas
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desertprep View Post
Thank you! Now...has anyone ever used a Chevy bb to replace a Ford bb? I like the selection of transmissions that Chevy has to offer for muscle.
Can it be done? Yes, of course!
Would a swap like that be practical? No. Motor mounts, transmission mounts, exhaust, and wiring harness(s) are all different and would require extensive time and labor to exchange. It would be a monumental task at best.
__________________
Richard (& Nancy, too!)
Livingston, Texas
2009 43' Allegro Bus QRP
matcoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2023, 11:58 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: oregon
Posts: 626
As above...big wallet and or a skilled fabricator along with a very nice shop. 460 Ford's are a very good engines and there transmissions. Point in fact Ford literally dominated heavy trucks during that time frame. Fleet mgrs don't buy based on emotions, reliability and performance and the overall cost of ownership.
EyezOpen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2023, 01:10 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Rob_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Canyon Lake, Texas
Posts: 2,468
Still shopping...

The Ford transmissions are plenty tough. They’re not used in drag racing because they have heavier internals than the GM counterparts and therefore more parasitic loss.

But I don’t think a Ford 4-speed w OD transmission (suitable for a big block) exists that doesn’t require a computer to run it.

The main benefit to running GM powertrain over Ford in racing applications is the aftermarket support.

Are you positive there’s 400# difference between a SBC and BBC? Maybe 200 which in a MH means nothing.
__________________
2002 American Tradition 40'
Cummins 8.3, Banks 431hp, 1260 tq
Canyon Lake, TX
Rob_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2023, 06:18 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Wyoming, Michigan
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desertprep View Post
For a motor home. I have noticed that most of the MH I have seen have a large block 4xx cid in them. A 383 cid stoker has more horsepower and torque - even without maxing the 383 but weighs about half as much. Is there a reason for the big block? Dumping 400 pounds sounds really good.

Should we assume the "383 stroker" you refer to is a Chevrolet engine, and not a Chrysler?

If so, please tell me what "big block" V8 weighs 400 pounds than a "383 stroker"?
OHUQTU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2023, 12:22 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Flyer15015's Avatar
 
Fleetwood Owners Club
Workhorse Chassis Owner
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: On the continental divide
Posts: 1,632
I'm very happy with our 8.1 Chevy gasser and the Allison 1000 Tx with the UltraRV ECM /TCM mod's, and we work her pretty hard pulling an 8K# car hauler all over Colorado.
I have read that the limiting factor of the 8.1 are the small ports in the head, but there are aluminum heads available with much bigger ports, that supposedly set this engine free. This might be the easiest way to go if you want to hop this motor up and maintain reliability. Drop a better intake and throttle body in there to really make it breath better, and you might have a winner. Then of course long tube headers would also be required.

Just a thought.

Mike in Colorado
__________________
2004 Fleetwood Pace Arrow 37c, 8.1 gasser, (Jezebel) Ultra RV ECM / TCM and rear track bar, PPE deep Tx pan, Bilstein's, Sailun's & Sumo's all round, pushed by a 2002 Grand Caravan, on a Master Tow Dolly.
Flyer15015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Still shopping; Newmar, Entegra, American Eagle H. Top_Speed1 Class A Motorhome Discussions 120 01-27-2017 11:19 AM
Still shopping for 1st RV Mimi Lucy New Member Check-In 22 04-19-2015 09:43 AM
Wannabe's Questions (still shopping) gjurrens Class A Motorhome Discussions 16 08-31-2014 05:37 PM
Still Shopping EduardoMaya Monaco Owner's Forum 1 04-05-2013 12:44 PM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.