Quote:
Originally Posted by Tlmr4784
And you guys are trying to throw Blue Ox under the bus....it sounds like Jeep has the failure here...
Did I miss something?
|
Oh yes, and quite a few others did as well.
Folks don't seem to understand that the Jeep suv's do not have a frame. They are unit body (uni-body) construction, whereby many smaller sheets of metal are stamped into shapes and spot welded together to form the body of the vehicle. Unlike the Jeep Wrangler which, indeed, does use a traditional ladder frame with body attached.
A new wrinkle, partially illustrated by previous post with picture(s) is an aluminum sub frame that presumably was used as an attachment point by Blue Ox. A big no-no for several reasons. If the sub-frame was not attached to directly, it was severely stressed by the result. You need to think heavily about that and the implications. Seriously.
Big rush to assign blame without thinking of the underlying design of the vehicle.
Is it the fault of Jeep? Hell no! Is it the fault of the government? What isn't? That leaves Blue Ox, don't it? Language police stand down.
All our vehicles are being reduced in properties we used to be able to take for granted. Durability and longevity for two, and arguably usability.
So as a result, the Jeep Suv's are built to satisfy government standards that have unintended consequences. That also can be argued, but not here.
Instead of a sturdy frame to attach to, a sheet metal body shell with hidden points of reinforcement, frequently with no backside access is all that remains.
I see Blue Ox guilty of attempting to attach a towing system to the shell of an ostrich egg on wheels. That doesn't mean it can't be done, they just aren't smart enough, yet, to do it. Or smart enough not to try.
Phil