 |
|
04-14-2014, 01:42 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 138
|
Serious ? for those who prefer Class C's
I have been considering buying a Class A most recently and have seen some nice ones. But now I'm wondering why not look at Class C's also. I like the idea of sitting up high in a Class A and enjoying the spectacular views when driving, but am wondering why others go with Class C's instead. The insides seem rather equal in floor plans and quality, so why are you a Class C person rather than a Class A one?
Now I understand the reason when you talk about short ones, but I am referring to the longer ones say 30' or so. What are the advantages of a larger Class C over a class A. It seems like the used Class Cs can actually be more expensive than the 10 yr old A's.
So why, how, when, etc of C's over A's. Does ease of use enter into it at all, especially for older less physical people are concerned? What is your take on it all?
Thanks, any and all input would be helpful to me now. Let's take 2 examples of what I like and what has raised these questions:
1. 29' Class C
2. 30' Class A
|
|
|
 |
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
04-14-2014, 01:46 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,212
|
They typically drive better. With an A you will be the 1st to an accident. I like the side entrance to a C rather than walking thru the passenger seat.
|
|
|
04-14-2014, 03:02 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 77
|
I like that more parts are standard truck parts.
__________________
Jim Apple
wb1dog
|
|
|
04-14-2014, 03:20 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Fleetwood Owners Club
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 905
|
Good question, makes you say hmmmm. In some cases, better crash protection for driver and passenger, steel all around and air bags. Sleeps more people than Class A for the most part, probably better for families. Cheaper to maintain, parts more readily available and standard, ie tires, wiper blades etc. Easier to drive and possibly less intimidating. Less initial cost when new and possibly less depreciation for the first couple five years. Better gas mileage, debateable. No prefect motor home, Class C no exception, but does many things pretty well.
|
|
|
04-14-2014, 04:00 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Plantation, Fl
Posts: 1,836
|
Lots of good reasons already stated. As for your examples, you posted a 6 year old C and an 11 year old A. Although the narrow body C you posted when new was probably more expensive than most "normal" wide body cab over Cs.
__________________
2014 Itasca Spirit 31K
2016 Mazda CX5, on an Acme tow dolly, 4 trips 5800mi
Now 2017 RWD F 150 with a drive shaft disconnect
|
|
|
04-14-2014, 04:10 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Thor Owners Club Solo Rvers Club Mid Atlantic Campers Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 755
|
I have a class C and have been looking at class A's. When I realized that most class A's have no driver or passenger doors I started having second thoughts about a class A.
__________________
2006 Four Winds Majestic 23A
|
|
|
04-14-2014, 04:23 PM
|
#7
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kewanee, Il.
Posts: 24
|
Class C 16" tires are cheaper to replace than Class A's. You have 3 doors to exit.
|
|
|
04-14-2014, 04:31 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Winnebago Owners Club
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 335
|
We have never owned an A, but currently have a newer C. Looked at a lot of Class A's but the ones we liked did not have a egress door for passenger/driver (tho some do…), that was a deal breaker for us. The view in the A's are better, but we like that we can take ours to the Ford dealer for regular maintenance on engine, transmission, etc (still under warranty tho). For us, well we are just more comfortable with ours. We don't have overhead bunk as we have a Winnebago Aspect. AND I never feel like ducking when going under a bridge…some of those huge A's…well I just hold my breath when I see them cruise under a bridge. Our C is 30' and we have a tow vehicle.
I looked at the two you linked, Jayco makes a great unit, as does Itasca. Have you driven both? I believe you will have more storage in the A if you take a lot of things.
Good luck in your search and let us know what you decide.
|
|
|
04-14-2014, 04:40 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
National RV Owners Club Ford Super Duty Owner
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 817
|
Had a 29' class c for nine years. It had a great floor plan, which is the most important decision in my opinion. We thought we wanted a larger unit, so went with a 34 class a. For us - big mistake. We miss the convenience of the extra doors, the easier parking, better floor plan of the c. If I were choosing between the two you posted I would go with the Jayco. That being said, you are the one who knows if it will fit your family's needs. I do think the Jayco is priced at the upper end and you should be able to talk them down.
Good luck in whatever you decide.
__________________
Neil, Lin, and our furry companions, Ashby and Cody. 06 National Surf Side.
|
|
|
04-14-2014, 05:16 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 352
|
If you look at the spec the jayco would be a Class B, personally I would definitely go with the Itaska, more room inside, nicer ride and lot more storage room.
__________________
Mike, Martina and Maya our yellow Lab
2013 CrossRoads, Cruiser 29,5 ft 5thWeel, 2010 Ram HEMI 1500
|
|
|
04-14-2014, 06:55 PM
|
#11
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In a lawnchair
Posts: 11,990
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mich F
Lots of good reasons already stated. As for your examples, you posted a 6 year old C and an 11 year old A. Although the narrow body C you posted when new was probably more expensive than most "normal" wide body cab over Cs.
|
This. ^^
__________________
|
|
|
04-14-2014, 07:18 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Near Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,842
|
I'll give you 3 good reasons why the DW and I prefer a C over an A.
She's more relaxed driving it.
It's easier to drive in city traffic and park in parking lots.
It has 2 full beds without rearranging either the sofa or dinette, just in case SHE starts snoring. ;-p
__________________
Ted 'n' Laurie, plus Jackson (aka Deputy Dog, the Parson Russell Terrier 'fur kid') and, Rylie (who crossed the Rainbow Bridge June 14, 2012).
|
|
|
04-15-2014, 08:24 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Upstate (the other) New York
Posts: 625
|
We chose a C over an A for a couple reasons.
Easier to drive and park. My wife refuses drive an A.
C fits in the campsites we like. An A won't.
I can go to any Ford dealer for service on the engine and chassis.
No slides, no motorized awning, no motorized steps, way less problems.
__________________
2021 T@B 320 S Boondock
Upstate (the other) New York
|
|
|
04-15-2014, 09:44 AM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Payson
Posts: 576
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by milasman
Good question, makes you say hmmmm. In some cases, better crash protection for driver and passenger, steel all around and air bags. Sleeps more people than Class A for the most part, probably better for families. Cheaper to maintain, parts more readily available and standard, ie tires, wiper blades etc. Easier to drive and possibly less intimidating. Less initial cost when new and possibly less depreciation for the first couple five years. Better gas mileage, debateable. No prefect motor home, Class C no exception, but does many things pretty well.
|
X2 Well put, that about covers it.
__________________
2012 Nexus Phantom 23P Class C
Ford E-350 Chassis 6.8L V-10 w/5 speed trans w/tow haul mode, 55 gal fuel tank
USCG Licensed Master 100 Ton (Retired)
|
|
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|